Other O-Line options in round 1

[Nicomo Cosca]

(02-22-2021, 04:17 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I find Essex's point to be fair. He clearly states that he'd only entertain trade back if Sewell is gone. I'm not sure I disagree with the idea. If Sewell is gone the value is there are QB or WR and we really don't need either. 

We absolutely do need a WR though. Whatever has posted the numbers several times now as far as where Burrow ranked in having to throw to covered WR’s, and it ain’t pretty. I don’t know why folks are choosing to ignore that when it’s being laid out for them to see in black and white. It’s not as simple as just saying “we already have 2 good WR’s.” Fact is they just don’t get open though. Aren’t you guys sick of watching our opponents constantly have guys running wide open, and our receivers have to fight for every inch and every ball? I am.