04-30-2021, 03:02 PM
(04-30-2021, 02:45 PM)Beaker Wrote: Because Pitts was the best non QB available, who went at 4, then came Chase. It was only a hot debate because so many posters were convinced that we could only save Burrow by taking the top O line prospect. But Sewell wasnt rated as highly as Chase in general.
Right well OL is arguably the biggest need.
But we went BPA which is fine. as long as we still address the need which im sure we will.
No matter how good Sewell is he can only play 1 spot on the OL at a time (so it wouldnt have instantly fixed our issues there)
