10-17-2021, 05:41 PM
(10-16-2021, 08:28 PM)Rubekahn29 Wrote: Sewell was billed as the second coming of Anthony Munoz. If Chase was putting up the equivalent of what Sewell was doing, everyone on here would be worried and calling him a bust and saying we should have taken Sewell. Comes with the territory of such a hotly contested debate. When one plays well they will get propped up more than they probably should, and when one plays bad, they will get dogged harder than they should .
Strawman. I didn't compare Sewell to Munoz, and frankly most people didn't. I knew he was/is an elite prospect, but I also knew both Sewell and Chase missed last year and there was a chance they'd come out of the gate slow.
Actually, both or them did show rust, but Chase was able to REALLY shake it off after preseason.
...and a bad take is a bad take. Don't say stuff out your bunghole just because you're salty. I have zero respect for that.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
