06-26-2022, 03:28 PM
(06-26-2022, 02:46 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Let's say you're 100% correct. The decision reversing Roe was firmly grounded in the Constitution. If you can make a valid argument that it was not, and was motivated solely by religious beliefs then, by all means, do so. I have yet to see this from you, though.
I never asserted that it was "solely" because of religious belief. I've noticed that you have a habit of misrepresenting positions.
What I have asserted is that religious belief undergirds and motivates them to use and interpret the Constitution in ways that align with their religious ideology and serves enforce their version of morality on the population as a whole.
If you want proof of what the Evangelical Republican movement wants and by what means they think is most effective in achieving those desires, simply listen to their own words and statements. They view the constitution as God inspired, which is why they place so much emphasis on it.
Whether or not something is "grounded" in the constitution, it doesn't speak to the nefarious epistemological rationale that serves as the ammunition for weaponizing it to make their objectives a reality.
