06-26-2022, 04:03 PM
(06-26-2022, 03:15 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: I didn't go anywhere, I literally read what you wrote regarding men vs. women.
I said nothing about men vs. women in the original post you responded to. You interpreted as such. I'm not responsible for your insertion of gender into a post about biological reproduction.
Quote:So, you admit your statement that prompted my response was inaccurate and denied the existence of transgender men.
Again, you introduced gender into the conversation, when gender has nothing to do with biological reproduction.
Quote:I concur. Except that's not what you said. I understand completely, it's you who appears confused.
Yet again, I spoke of biological reproduction and you chose to interpret that as gender related.
Quote:What an obvious case of projection. I'll repost your own words, again.
There is no way to interpret your response outside of men are not "required" to deal with the three things you mentioned, because that's literally what you said. This completely denies the existence and lived experience of transgender men. Hence I called you out on it. Now, if your mistake was inadvertent, simply say so, apologize and we'll move on. I will certainly take you at your word that you made an inadvertent error. But kindly quit trying to deflect the blame for your statement on to me.
The only way to interpret "one" as "men" is to confuse biological reproduction with gender. "One" refers to anyone possessing the ability to become pregnant. They could be men or women. Again, it's not my issue that you chose to assign gender.
Perhaps this will help, by making extremely simple:
Group A contains all people that possess the biological means to become pregnant.
Group B contains all people that don't possess the biological means to become pregnant.
Groups A and B are comprised of both men and women, both cis and trans.
Group A is more directly [physically, mentally and emotionally] affected than Group B.
