06-27-2022, 11:13 PM
(06-27-2022, 10:44 PM)pally Wrote: In 1973 7 Justices said it was covered by the Constitution
And at one point slavery and segregation were found to be covered by the Constitution. You can't have it both ways, either precedent is sacrosanct or it is not. If it is not, then Friday's decision cannot be viewed solely through the lens of an unprecedented assault on SCOTUS norms. Which it clearly isn't, based on the over 200 times the SCOTUS has reversed precedent in its past, as already covered in this very thread.