06-13-2023, 04:22 PM
(06-13-2023, 04:17 PM)Lucidus Wrote: If an individual - either accidentally or purposefully - shoots someone, should they be required by law to allow the person they shot to use their blood / organs to save or sustain their life? Should the right to life of the person who was shot supersede the bodily autonomy of the shooter?
Never thought of that. I’m going to go with yes. The shooter already decided it’s ok to exert bodily autonomy over another.
“History teaches that grave threats to liberty often come in times of urgency, when constitutional rights seem too extravagant to endure.”-Thurgood Marshall
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
