Roe Vs Wade Overturned

[*Nately120*]

(12-09-2023, 10:34 PM)HarleyDog Wrote: Damn. You know, I guess the argument comes down to when the baby has rights? When the baby feels pain should be sufficient. Either way, I've not heard that angle before and it's a good one because it's true.

Political arguments where you ask a voter to consider the suffering of other people don't get much traction in the "what's in it for me" culture we have going.  I mean sure it's nice to think about the rights and pain a baby might feel but what's next?  Caring about that baby's education?  Or the state of the world in which he or she will grow?  Caring about the baby having clean air and clean water?  Caring about free school lunches?  It's a slippery-slope of caring if you ask people to care.

Also, I'm not going to bat for making babies suffer, but I don't recall anything until I was at least 2 years old and unless I experienced no physical pain until then I feel like I didn't feel it.