12-13-2023, 01:30 AM
(12-12-2023, 09:06 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: So, apparently, the possibility that Kate Cox could have been left unable to have another child if forced to carry the fetus to term was not adequate under Texas law. Because it was her fertility and not her life that was at risk it was not a valid exception to the law.
Seems like a "cutting off the nose to spite the face" type of situation that Texas has created.
I also have to say that if we see her face civil or criminal consequences for this it will be one of the largest boons to the pro-choice movement we have ever seen.
Indeed. As I've repeatedly said in this thread, the TX law is not a well written or crafted law.
(12-12-2023, 10:41 PM)NATI BENGALS Wrote: Wow .
I didn’t think anybody would be on board with forcing an individual to reveal their private personal medical information to the courts.
Talk about violation of privacy.
Holy smokes. But here we are.
Must be a democrat thing wanting to prevent US citizens from being forced to disclose personal health information to the courts and letting the courts determine what medical decision they want you to make.
Wild wild shit
I don't disagree with you. Interestingly, this is exactly what occurs in the oft touted "superior" socialist health care systems of the UK or Canada.
