FBI executes search warrant at Mar-A-Lago

[GMDino]

(08-10-2022, 02:12 PM)Sled21 Wrote: I do not believe they ever looked into, nor will this administration look into Pelosi and her husband buying and selling stocks with insider information, but if anyone thinks old Paul is that good a guesser of what stocks to buy and when to sell them I have this bridge I'd like to sell you.
They have turned a blind eye to Hunter and his gun. Everyone admits it, no one will charge him. 
It's well documented Hillary had extensive classified documents on her private unsecure server, and that she had used unsecure email to communicate them with her secretary, old what's her name who was married to the degenerate Anthony Weiner. No charges.

So I looked up the gun story.

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/03/25/sources-secret-service-inserted-itself-into-case-of-hunter-bidens-gun-477879


A couple things caught my eye:

In 2018 when Biden was not under SS protection someone claiming to be SS asked for the paperwork from the purchase.  That's weird as Trump was in office and why would they want to cover up for hunter?

Secondly this quote:

Quote:POLITICO obtained copies of the Firearms Transaction Record and a receipt for the gun dated Oct. 12, 2018.


Hunter responded “no” to a question on the transaction record that asks, “Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance?” Five years earlier, he had been discharged from the Navy Reserve after testing positive for cocaine, and he and family members have spoken about his history of drug use.


Lying on the form is a felony, though prosecutions for it are exceedingly rare.

I'm going to suppose that this is one of those things where the governing body chooses when and where to enforce the law because there would be so many to go after.  But I don't know.

So I'm not sure who "they" are but nonetheless his not being prosecuted falls into the "rare" category I guess.

On the trading, I have been against members of congress and their spouses trading because whether they "know" anything or not there will always be the appearance of illegality.  Much like I wanted Trump to completely divest of his businesses.

And for Clinton, well, I'll just leave it as it wouldn't matter what I said because over six years of "lock her up" chants has made it hard to convince anyone who believes that any different.

Lastly not a single one of those things has any bearing on what happened with Trump as he signed the law that he broke.