08-14-2022, 10:25 AM
(08-14-2022, 02:36 AM)guyofthetiger Wrote: My point is the main stream media keeps changing what is reported. And people believe it. There are numerous false reports and I see no retractions. The press just says something without being held accountable. BTW Hillary Clinton had a server at her home with classified information and was never charged.
The media has been reporting based on what sources have told them. Do they verify the information as much as we would like? Probably not. But if they have sources saying something then why retract it? By saying that "sources have said..." they are still reporting accurate information even if those sources turn out to be wrong.
As for Clinton, an investigation found that charges were not warranted. As this point in time we do not know if charges will be warranted for Trump. We don't know the extent of his wrongdoing. Do they have evidence of just having this material? Then they probably won't levy charges for just that. Do they have evidence he was or was planning to use them in other ways that would be criminal? Well, that may be more of an issue. You're making judgements based on incomplete information.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
