03-17-2016, 01:33 PM
(03-17-2016, 11:03 AM)PDub80 Wrote: And, being a lawyer, I hope you can appreciate my Jack McCoying you so hard right now.
Which is it?
Dre Kirk is really good because he starts on a really good D?
Or Justin Smith is really bad because started on a really bad D, that only got better immediately after he left?
Actually as a person with a high school level of logical arguments I am laughing at you right now.
"If A then B" can not be used to prove "If not A then not B". You can not use two opposite fact patterns to prove the same point.
The fact that Dre starts on a good defense is important because if he was bad teams would pick on him and gain yards. But, while Justin Smith was an elite player offenses simple avoided him to pick on weaker parts of the defense.
I know that not every player on a good defense is automatically good. But when I watch the Bengals it is clear that opposing QBs are not able to just pick on Dre to drive down the field and score.
