Democrats losing all credibility in denial of overwhelming evidence..

[Dill]

(03-22-2024, 09:39 AM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Just when you thought that this clown show that we call a government couldn't get any more outlandish.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/democrats-lost-one-precious-thing-at-hunter-influence-peddling-hearing/ar-BB1kl5eU?ocid=msedgntp&pc=U531&cvid=5d6c64a275584383802291c7a2bf9ce1&ei=100

Has anyone contested that Hunter was influence peddling, or trying to?

I think the question is still the degree to which his father was implicated,
or can be implicated for "knowing" there was influence peddling.

"10% to the big guy" is not enough to convict the big guy of anything if
no one can show 10% of improperly gained money improperly going to him. 

So you do need to catch Biden stealing a "hubcap" if you want legal traction.

To me this "life long Democrat" opinion just sounds like the usual selective outrage of a Hannity guest spot,
and of a piece with the longgoing, ongoing Trump/Guiliani/GOP effort to find something, ANYTHING, 
on the scale of Trump wrongdoing and stick it on Biden. I think THAT is what Dems are opposing here.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/joe-biden/lev-parnas-ex-giuliani-associate-testifies-allegations-bidens-are-fals-rcna144250

The much harder to establish degree of "knowing" has come to the fore of "outrage"
only because other tactics and attempts have failed.