03-24-2024, 04:03 PM
(03-24-2024, 01:56 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: The Jan.6th riot was no acceptable. The Jan. 6th committee's report was predetermined.
The narrative of the committee was destroying Trump, not get all of the facts. There are always 2 sides to every story. The committee purposely refused to report any findings of Trump in fact did ask for more security. There are now at least 5 witnesses confirming it.
Again, one more example of TDS by Democrats and never Trumpers (fair committees allow minority leader to appoint their committee members, Pelosi stacked the committee on purpose. They did not want the truth, they wanted to create a show (hired Hollywood to produce it).
The truth shall set you free. In one more case, Democrats lies and attempt to destroy a POTUS will backfire.
who testified that they heard TRUMP ask for more security? You have testimony that someone who says he overheard Mark Meadows, in a phone conversation with a person whose identity he could not independently confirm, CLAIM that he offered but he can't testify that Trump actually offered it. There is no testimony from Mark Meadows saying differently. You have testimony from other people disputing this claim
and as the Commander in Chief of the DC National Guard and as someone who had access to the intelligence surrounding the "rally" why didn't he show good judgment and override any objections? And when it was shown they were needed why the unexplainable delay in ordering them to DC?
You want to have it both ways...you want him to get credit for knowing that more security was needed and blame others for rejecting it but the responsibility was all his.
Fueled by the pursuit of greatness.
