01-17-2016, 08:41 PM
(01-17-2016, 06:18 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: "If you just blame everything you can on the other people, he was bad for ONLY a little under half of the game (but 80% of the time the Bengals O had the ball). Plus, if you take away all the bad things he did, he was almost mediocre!"
I was responding specifically to RoyleReda$$'s claim that
Quote:he was terrible for the vast majority of the game.
Now, I don't have to prove that he was otherworldly for more than half the game, or even that he was really good for more than half the game, only "not terrible" for a decent portion of the game in order to prove how stupid Royle's claim was.
For 30-40% of the game, AJM was bad. I wouldn't call it terrible, but if Royle wants to that's fine.
For the other 60-70% of the game (TOP, plays, or actual game minutes) he was not terrible. So Royle is full of crap.
Is there another argument you can barge in on somewhere?