How about AJ McCarron

[*TheLeonardLeap*]

(01-17-2016, 10:27 PM)BigSeph Wrote: You are including drives on which he was not terrible.


Is this "terrible?"  2-2 for 13 yards and no first down because Whit had a false start?


Is this "terrible?"  4-6 for 44 yards, sacked once, but drove the team from the Cincy 29 to the Pitt 38?

You are attempting to include drives and possessions on which he wasn't "terrible" and lump it in with the late 2nd/early 3rd quarters when he was admittedly bad.

You can't say someone was "terrible for the vast majority of the game" when you consider 6-8 for 57 yards as "terrible."

Well you could if you're dumb, I guess.

So your argument is that 2-2, 13 yards (which is only 6.5 YPA, pretty poor) and another drive are the reason why he wasn't terrible?

So rather than 10/12, you're arguing for 8/12.. which last I checked, is still 66.6%, and still quite the majority.