01-12-2016, 04:39 PM
(01-12-2016, 04:36 PM)fredtoast Wrote: I am logical. You are the one who claimed the defense did not allow the other team to drive down the field and score the winning points.
The offense scored the "potentially" game winning td and then the defense could not hold the lead.
And just like Brownshoe you are now changing the argument.
No. I've never changed the argument.
The defense made the "potentially" game winning INT and the offense could not hold onto the ball.
This is where you and I differ, both are correct, just sad you can't see it my way.
