09-18-2016, 09:00 PM
(09-18-2016, 08:50 PM)StrictlyBiz Wrote: Isn't the difference between those who get the benefit and those who don't the same as who won vs who lost? If you lose, you didn't get the benefit. If you win you did. I looked over a Steelers board and they were talking about missed calls that benefitted Cincinnati, but there wasn't much made of it because they won. It was mostly dismissed with an 'oh well'. I guarantee that if Cincinnati won today there would be a lot of discussion over those same calls.
No doubt it swings both ways "if".
When you win more, you seem to get more favorable calls. When you don't, you don't. It's not just Pitt. NE is the same way.
You can't ignore facts. When a call is wrong, it's simply wrong. What it comes down to is who the call benefitted more.
When it comes to knees down or not, Pitt benefitted twice to the Bengals zero today.
Holding, PI, all that shit, i don't care about. That's all just bad officiating. Game and momentum changing plays are what i'm talking about. 50/50 calls just don't go the Bengals way and it's amplified when it's against a team like Pitt.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
