09-18-2016, 09:23 PM
(09-18-2016, 09:00 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: No doubt it swings both ways "if".It only seems that you get more favorable calls because you won. If Pittsburgh would've lost, it wouldn't be that way.
When you win more, you seem to get more favorable calls. When you don't, you don't. It's not just Pitt. NE is the same way.
You can't ignore facts. When a call is wrong, it's simply wrong. What it comes down to is who the call benefitted more.
When it comes to knees down or not, Pitt benefitted twice to the Bengals zero today.
Holding, PI, all that shit, i don't care about. That's all just bad officiating. Game and momentum changing plays are what i'm talking about. 50/50 calls just don't go the Bengals way and it's amplified when it's against a team like Pitt.
I agree about holding/PI/ and all that shit.
And as far as the first knee, shouldn't you be more pissed off at Marvin Lewis for not challenging the call than at the refs for missing it?
The second knee, you've got a point. The only thing that I can think of is that the view of the ball is unclear on the way down and you cannot, without a doubt, say that it wasn't moving before the knee hit.
