01-16-2019, 09:11 PM
(01-16-2019, 02:33 PM)Devils Advocate Wrote: [ -> ]Andy Dalton is a selling point to potential coaching candidates.
Tannehill isn’t coming here.
Lol... no
(01-16-2019, 02:33 PM)Devils Advocate Wrote: [ -> ]Andy Dalton is a selling point to potential coaching candidates.
Tannehill isn’t coming here.
(01-16-2019, 01:10 PM)NKURyan Wrote: [ -> ]I'll be a total homer and disagree. Cleveland hasn't had a non-losing season in 12 years - even the Bengals of the 90s never went on a streak like that - and they beat one good team all of last year. They're improving, but I'm nowhere close to being convinced that they've arrived yet. Baltimore is one dimensional, almost choked the division away last year, and has been pretty up-and-down over the last few years. The Steelers are losing their best player for the 2nd year in a row, and while they may very well bounce back that team has some serious lockerroom issues. As flawed as the Bengals are I'm just not convinced that they are that out of it.
I'd be ticked if they just threw in the towel.
(01-16-2019, 12:55 PM)bengals67 Wrote: [ -> ]I think Dalton is an incredible person. His wife is an incredibly lady. Everyone should admire and respect all that he and his wife have done for Cincinnati on the field and in the community.
Tannehill for Dalton no way.
Tannehill plus a couple of high draft choices for Dalton yes.
We are heading into a rebuild stage. I do not agree with those who think we have a strong roster and are only a couple of players away. Cleveland and Baltimore are heading up and the Steelers are the Steelers. Both our o line and linebackers are awful and that cannot be fixed in one year.
The new coach will want his own QB if they can get that person. Both Dalton and Tannehill are/would be bridges to the new guy.
(01-16-2019, 08:07 PM)bfine32 Wrote: [ -> ]Want no part of Tannehill. he's expensive, mediocre, and hasn't played a full year since Andy's MVP year.
(01-16-2019, 12:48 PM)treee Wrote: [ -> ]I just wonder when people are gonna accept that Andy's deep throws are average at best. Yea, go ahead and pull out some statistics saying he is top 10 at deeps balls. I'm saying anyone with AJ Green is gonna have a good deep ball percentage. Also explains why we haven't really gotten Ross jump started yet either. He's not a jump ball specialist like AJ, you have to actually be able to hit him in stride, that is how speedsters work.
(01-16-2019, 12:48 PM)treee Wrote: [ -> ]I just wonder when people are gonna accept that Andy's deep throws are average at best. Yea, go ahead and pull out some statistics saying he is top 10 at deeps balls. I'm saying anyone with AJ Green is gonna have a good deep ball percentage. Also explains why we haven't really gotten Ross jump started yet either. He's not a jump ball specialist like AJ, you have to actually be able to hit him in stride, that is how speedsters work.
(01-16-2019, 09:46 PM)TKUHL Wrote: [ -> ]Which is why I hated the pic then and even more now.
(01-16-2019, 09:59 PM)BengalChris Wrote: [ -> ]Hitting a WR with a microscopic catch radius in stride ain't that easy to do.
The NFL is not like that the PAC 12 was when Ross was there where zones gave him wide areas to into. In the NFL he's going to have a guy on his hip wherever he goes.
(01-16-2019, 10:04 PM)BengalsRocker Wrote: [ -> ]He felt like a late 2nd round pick to me for any team.
Why does this guy feel like a project player too after watching him?
I hope to hell that Zac Taylor and company get something more out of him.
I don't think Ross is a bust but still seems too raw for a 1st round WR pick.
(01-16-2019, 10:40 PM)Benton Wrote: [ -> ]Taylor is supposed to be an offensive genius. If he thinks Tim tebow is the the answer, then I'm along for the ride.
I like Dalton. Probably more than most on this board. But if the new coach wants a box of cheezits, then get him a box of cheezits. If he wants tannehill, get him tannehill.
And if it doesn't work in a couple seasons, then scrap it and get a new coach.
(01-16-2019, 11:13 PM)bfine32 Wrote: [ -> ]You only suggested cheezits because they're orange like Andy's hair.
(01-17-2019, 01:38 AM)Atomic Orange Wrote: [ -> ]I would seriously question whether or not they made the right choice at HC.
And then i'd give him the chance to prove me wrong.
(01-16-2019, 12:35 PM)depthchart Wrote: [ -> ]The Dolphins appear ready to move on from QB Ryan Tannehill and stories are popping up that reuniting him with Zac Taylor in Cincinnati may be the place Tannehill lands.
Tannehill is a little over a year younger than Andy Dalton and much stranger things than a move like this have happened in the NFL.
Should this QB change occur and with the approval of expected New Head Coach Zac Taylor; What would be your opinion of and reaction to this being Zac Taylor's statement making move ?
Possible Pros & Cons to this move (Draft picks for Dalton/Tannehill's injury history etc) ?
(01-16-2019, 04:44 PM)XenoMorph Wrote: [ -> ]plus if the goal was to tank we should have just hired the master Hue
(01-17-2019, 02:00 AM)BengalChris Wrote: [ -> ]I'm pretty sure the whoever they pick will be questioned until the team wins in the playoffs. We could easily continue to loss with Marvin Lewis or Hue at the helm. The guy will have to bring home the bacon and it can't take 16 years to figure out it's not happening.
(01-16-2019, 03:06 PM)Nately120 Wrote: [ -> ]I bet if Tannehill dyed his hair red we wouldn't know which white bread QB we had under center. The Bengals and Dolphins have both been similar as of late. Either miss the playoffs or go into it with a backup and a broken heart.
(01-17-2019, 11:20 AM)ochocincos Wrote: [ -> ]Don’t forget that both had Bill Lazor as their OC.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk