Complete BS for them to call that incomplete afterward. Wait for the damn replay.
So they showed a replay down the line, and while he was throwing it, the ball looked like it went parallel to the line.
That would mean a score!
What the **** am I watching?!
I would've got in the running car.
It was still grounding
That looks like an incomplete pass
(11-01-2020, 05:30 PM)sloSTI Wrote: [ -> ]Is the goofball on TV saying that should be a roughing the passer penalty?
No. He was saying Tannehill is elusive in space.
(11-01-2020, 05:31 PM)Joelist Wrote: [ -> ]Glad ZT is challenging. This is either a fumble or intentional grounding.
No IG. Dudes a was hit plus his whole body was hit while throwing.
Sent from my LG-Q710AL using Tapatalk
(11-01-2020, 05:30 PM)Clark W Griswold Wrote: [ -> ]This is a good challenge even though I think he will lose. You have to take a shot at it when it could mean 7 points.
Not if it didn’t actually go backwards. Certainly not a fumble.
(11-01-2020, 05:31 PM)Atomic Orange Wrote: [ -> ]It was still grounding
Agreed, that definitely should have been called but I don't think it was a fumble. At least one the replays I saw
I think I’m still high from all that glade air freshener I huffed last night.
This doesn’t seem real
The challenge is that it is either a fumble or grounding - he was in the pocket and no receiver was anywhere in the area.
(11-01-2020, 05:31 PM)BrownAssClown Wrote: [ -> ]I would've got in the running car.
Still cracks me up every time.
(11-01-2020, 05:31 PM)BrownAssClown Wrote: [ -> ]I would've got in the running car.
Are you crazy?!
Sent from my LG-Q710AL using Tapatalk
(11-01-2020, 05:31 PM)Atomic Orange Wrote: [ -> ]It was still grounding
clearly. In the pocket. At least an additional loss of down.
(11-01-2020, 05:31 PM)PlayadLc Wrote: [ -> ]Horrible challenge.
Why? Take a shot before they snap the ball. Up 24-7 it’s worth the chance because you don’t have a lot of time.
(11-01-2020, 05:31 PM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: [ -> ]Dammit I just scared the dog for nothing.
I'm good.
