12-21-2023, 05:13 PM
(12-21-2023, 05:05 PM)PCB Bengal Fan Wrote: [ -> ]Rudy Johnson is a product of a good line. Not top 5 Bengal RBs. Never broke a big run over 40.
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/J/JohnRu00.htm
You were saying?
(12-21-2023, 05:05 PM)PCB Bengal Fan Wrote: [ -> ]Rudy Johnson is a product of a good line. Not top 5 Bengal RBs. Never broke a big run over 40.
(12-21-2023, 05:13 PM)Truck_1_0_1_ Wrote: [ -> ]https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/J/JohnRu00.htm
You were saying?
(12-21-2023, 05:26 PM)Truck_1_0_1_ Wrote: [ -> ]I mean, I bolded your incorrect statement and provided proof of it: I couldn't care less where people rank him.
(12-21-2023, 05:06 PM)PCB Bengal Fan Wrote: [ -> ]Still the best RB in Bengal history & it's not even close.
(12-21-2023, 06:23 PM)bfine32 Wrote: [ -> ]How is it "not even close"? James Brooks has over 1,000 more total yards as a Bengal than Dillon. He averaged about .5 more YPC
(12-21-2023, 06:23 PM)bfine32 Wrote: [ -> ]How is it "not even close"? James Brooks has over 1,000 more total yards as a Bengal than Dillon. He averaged about .5 more YPC
(12-21-2023, 06:41 PM)Whatever Wrote: [ -> ]Dillon had 9543 total yards in 7 years as a Bengal. Brooks had 9459 yards in 8.
(12-20-2023, 05:28 PM)StoneTheCrow Wrote: [ -> ]Eh I couldn’t blame him. They deserved the bad-mouthing. I did plenty of it myself.Maybe so, but we're not professionals. Professionals should act...professional. His time came to leave and he could have left with some grace, and chose to act a fool. It's a shame too, but this is what happens when you burn bridges.
(12-21-2023, 06:23 PM)bfine32 Wrote: [ -> ]How is it "not even close"? James Brooks has over 1,000 more total yards as a Bengal than Dillon. He averaged about .5 more YPC
(12-21-2023, 07:54 PM)Murdock2420 Wrote: [ -> ]Recency bias.
People saw Dillon but didn't see Brooks in his prime or at all.
Same reason people forget about Curtis when talking about WRs. I didn't see him live but watched enough old footage to realize he was before his time as a WR and is probably the best natural talent at WR this team has ever had.
(12-21-2023, 10:03 PM)PCB Bengal Fan Wrote: [ -> ]You're gonna compare Brooks who had the best offensive line in team history to Corey who played on the worst teams in team history? WHAT the TOTAL F!CK?
(12-21-2023, 04:41 PM)Sled21 Wrote: [ -> ]Say what you want, but I would suggest 95% of receivers playing today would be hurt all the time playing under the rules Chad and those before him played under.95% might be a bit high on the WRs, as they play on the edge of the field for the most part, but I do feel that Travis Kelce probably wouldn't be a household name if he played before 2011. He freely runs up the middle while looking back at Mahomes without fear of ever getting crushed. Rodney Holman was pretty reliable when called upon, but he never had the freedom of thinking "just worry about the pass as you run a slant 10 yards deep over the middle of the field". This is a modern NFL phenomenon.
(12-21-2023, 07:57 PM)bfine32 Wrote: [ -> ]Did you include KR yards?
(12-21-2023, 11:54 PM)Whatever Wrote: [ -> ]I only included yards from scrimmage. If you do, Brooks has an edge, but again, played one more year as a Bengal.
I'm not dogging Brooks, as he was a great swiss army knife of a player. But as a RB, comparing a guy who only managed 3 1000 yard rushing seasons in 8 years to a guy that had 6 in 7 is a major stretch. Not to mention Dillon broke the single game rookie and single game rising records.
(12-22-2023, 01:49 AM)bfine32 Wrote: [ -> ]Makes sense if you only give an RB credit for running. Brooks did so much more.
(12-21-2023, 07:47 PM)Murdock2420 Wrote: [ -> ]I'm not going through this entire thread to check but I hope no one is placing Burrow or Chase or most anyone on the current team on the all time list yet.
If Chase goes down with a career ender is he still an all time great with under 4000 yards? Chad Johnson, AJ Green and Isaac Curtis have the career numbers that make them stand out. The recent bias is silly.
(12-22-2023, 01:49 AM)bfine32 Wrote: [ -> ]Makes sense if you only give an RB credit for running. Brooks did so much more.
(12-22-2023, 10:47 AM)Whatever Wrote: [ -> ]By this logic, Ted Ginn Jr. Is a better WR than Chad Johnson because he destroys Chad in total yards when you factor in returns.
Return yards are generally kept separate when comparing players simply because how good/bad a returner you are has no bearing on how good you were at your primary position.