The announcers are saying who did they pick? Even they are confused by the bengals selections.
Why don’t we just use Mel’s best remaining players and pick one, we obviously don’t know what we are doing.
(04-25-2025, 09:39 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: [ -> ]We're rebuilding the senior bowl roster.
Keep the Bengals staff away from the Senior Bowl. Seems they are more impressed by workouts that actual play throughout the football season
Were building something big guys watch
(04-25-2025, 09:44 PM)Au165 Wrote: [ -> ]It’s odd that Golden wanted him over Watts. You can look at it as a knock on Watts I guess or a massive vote of confidence in Knight.
It telle us Golden has a specific skill set he is looking for and value Knight a fast LB over Watts, a fast ball hawking safety.
Everyone wanted Pratt gone, be happy the guy who forgot how to tackle in 2023 and 2024 is likely traded or cut
(04-25-2025, 09:38 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: [ -> ]Pally he sucks because our board GM's did not have them on the want list.
He is an athlete.
TY for the find,
(04-25-2025, 09:41 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: [ -> ]shhhh...we have the cry babies in full melt down and we need to stay quiet so they cry themselves to sleep
And you asked why you were being "attacked" earlier and now you're attacking everyone. You've willingly gone full Denny FO shill this offseason. Never go full Denny FO shill.
Mike is never going to let you get a ride on his golfcart.
So are we going to see a repeat tomorrow of people who are freaking out now who will have calmed down and realize it's not as bad a pick as you thought?
(04-25-2025, 09:46 PM)Gohards Wrote: [ -> ]Were building something big guys watch
I love we revamp the defensive coaching room and then give Golden 2 new toys to fix the defense, the defense most thought Pratt should not be a part of moving forward,
Reading his analysis, but not his tape, it’s not a sexy pick, but it’s a necessary one. Big frame so he can help run defense, solid in zone, and is a leader.
We need guys who can tackle and make plays. This was a good pick and an eventual starter.
(04-25-2025, 09:39 PM)sandwedge Wrote: [ -> ]The guys at NFL Network Draft Central love the pick. Old School LB that will smack you in the mouth...
The thing about Knight is he has to start this season with Logan Wilson because of his age. That means something has to happen with Germaine Pratt before Saturday evening or it's yet another team building fail.
(04-25-2025, 09:38 PM)CJD Wrote: [ -> ]What are the odds that the Bengals were prepared to pick Aireontae Ersery, the last true OT prospect that could move inside to OG, but the Texans sniped us and sent the front office into panic mode?
That pick came in within seconds of being on the clock, absolutely wasn't a panic pick.
Yesterday took them 5-6 minutes to pick, thus you could say Stewart was potentially one, but this wasn't.
They probably tried to trade down, got no takers (considering no one has come up in a while) and just went with their guy.
(04-25-2025, 09:38 PM)Trademark Wrote: [ -> ]this organization isn't serious
Neither are you.
(04-25-2025, 09:48 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: [ -> ]I love we revamp the defensive coaching room and then give Golden 2 new toys to fix the defense, the defense most thought Pratt should not be a part of moving forward,
Meanwhile Burrow is on IR because every team funnels their pass rush over our "Guards"....
I don't hate the player. IF that is the toy Golden wants then they are getting him speed that's for sure. As per usual though needs in the FO eyes and needs in the fan base eyes don't align. If they are even in on Rutledge they are playing it risky. Knowing this team they Prob grab Skattebo in the 3rd and just wait on a late flier on Kandra.
(04-25-2025, 09:47 PM)cinci4life Wrote: [ -> ]So are we going to see a repeat tomorrow of people who are freaking out now who will have calmed down and realize it's not as bad a pick as you thought?
It was not on my radar, but I like the 2 defensive picks back to back. I am no expert, but I think Golden is so I am going to trust his decisions.
(04-25-2025, 09:49 PM)Gdale_Bengal Wrote: [ -> ]Reading his analysis, but not his tape, it’s not a sexy pick, but it’s a necessary one. Big frame so he can help run defense, solid in zone, and is a leader.
We need guys who can tackle and make plays. This was a good pick and an eventual starter.
Because he was 6 years older than his teammates.
He could have been third best linebacker in the draft behind Campbell and Schwesinger.
(04-25-2025, 09:47 PM)cinci4life Wrote: [ -> ]So are we going to see a repeat tomorrow of people who are freaking out now who will have calmed down and realize it's not as bad a pick as you thought?
1st round pick Shemar, graded as a C+, would not consider that great pick. 1 1/2 sacks last year, oh yea, that’s going to help our pass rush.
How are you going to blow a second rounder on guy that comes off the field on the most critical down? Dumb as shit. We have Problem Pratt who went to pot after they agreed to let him pretend he was a 3 down linebacker. Now they get to liberate themselves from Pratt and replace him with his clone. Moronic.
So do when do we cut Pratt?
Good grief that’s as bad as the Stewart pick. Knight would’ve been there next round, and possibly the 4th. He’s almost out of his prime.
Can’t wait to see what they gift us with in the 3rd.
Now I really have no idea where they will go in the 3rd round.
So far 2 defensive picks meaning IOL makes a lot of sense so i will rule that out immediately.