(04-25-2025, 10:50 PM)Bengalbug Wrote: [ -> ]I want you to contribute something, anything that is meaningful or at least original to a topic of discussion.
ok I want more high risk projects and really old rookies
(04-25-2025, 10:37 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: [ -> ]As we start round 3 to the naysayers, how about you make a list of 15 to 20 guys you would be happy with at pick #81?
Robinson-DT
Tuten-RB
Walker-DT
Burch-DE
Stewart-DE
Watts- SAF
Thomas-CB
Sawyer-DE
Mbow-OG
Milum-OG
Pierce-OT
(04-25-2025, 10:39 PM)BengalsLUFC Wrote: [ -> ]Browns are having an A++ draft.
With those picks next year if they get a half decent QB we could be finishing 4th in the division real quick.
Definitely. They took a 3 tech in the Top 5 that only had 9 sacks in college.
(04-25-2025, 10:52 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: [ -> ]I say Steelers grab Sander with pick #83
Either way it'd be entertaining. They either do that and have the #83 overall pick QB who will somehow threaten Aaron Rodgers so much that he'll refuse to sign there...or they don't draft a QB and Rodgers uses that to hold them hostage and make a bunch of extra wacky demands.
More likely they roll with Rudolph and win 9 games and lose in the wild card round yet again.
(04-25-2025, 10:49 PM)Nately120 Wrote: [ -> ]It'd be funny if he went from "maybe to the Giants at #3 overall" to falling out of the top 100.
You are going to think I am crazy, but I’m going to let you know my true prediction with respect to Shedeur Sanders:
He goes undrafted.
There are a lot of people in NFL boardrooms who still hate Deion Sanders. This draft is not about Shedeur. It’s about his father.
(04-25-2025, 10:49 PM)Essex Johnson Wrote: [ -> ]I disagree, my mocks he was gone, no way im risking the guy they thought would not be there, that would be stupid
Reminds me of those defending taking Drew Sample in the 2nd, rather than trading back and selecting him later. I don't have a problem at all with selecting Knight. I have a problem with selecting him so early in the 2nd. I can't believe they wouldn't risk moving down 9 spots to get Knight -- where odds are strong he would still be available -- and pick up the 99th pick in the draft. But you think that would be stupid? An extra pick at the top of the 4th round?
(04-25-2025, 10:52 PM)Frank Booth Wrote: [ -> ]ok I want more high risk projects and really old rookies
Like whom?
Hoping for Watts, Winston, Sawyer or Skattebo at 81
(04-25-2025, 10:55 PM)Fan_in_Kettering Wrote: [ -> ]You are going to think I am crazy, but I’m going to let you know my true prediction with respect to Shedeur Sanders:
He goes undrafted.
There are a lot of people in NFL boardrooms who still hate Deion Sanders. This draft is not about Shedeur. It’s about his father.
Undrafted? Ehh, if he's available in the 6th or 7th round any team would be wise to take him, play him against 19th stringers in the pre-season and wait for some desperate GM to lose their starter.
Safety? Guard? Take Jared Wilson at Center and kick Ted Karras out to Guard?
(04-25-2025, 10:58 PM)Bengalbug Wrote: [ -> ]Like whom?
is tracy mcgrady still on the board?
If they had taken Ratledge in 2 and Knight in 3 I'd have been cool with it. It's the same bad habit of them locking in on players to the total exclusion of any thought of how to get to the same place in a more advantageous way.
(04-25-2025, 10:58 PM)Bengalbug Wrote: [ -> ]Like whom?
Johnny Fartball and Brandon "I Knew Calvin Coolidge" Weeden?
(04-25-2025, 10:56 PM)Nepa Wrote: [ -> ]Reminds me of those defending taking Drew Sample in the 2nd, rather than trading back and selecting him later. I don't have a problem at all with selecting Knight. I have a problem with selecting him so early in the 2nd. I can't believe they wouldn't risk moving down 9 spots to get Knight -- where odds are strong he would still be available -- and pick up the 99th pick in the draft. But you think that would be stupid? An extra pick at the top of the 4th d
Did you read golden comment, he was surprised he was still there, oir oick was in 20 se to 30 seconds stupid is as stupid does, like passing on player you want hoping they are there later
(04-25-2025, 10:54 PM)bfine32 Wrote: [ -> ]Robinson-DT
Tuten-RB
Walker-DT
Burch-DE
Stewart-DE
Watts- SAF
Thomas-CB
Sawyer-DE
Mbow-OG
Milum-OG
Pierce-OT
Nice to see someone put their picks out there, not surprised it was you
If they put 15 guys out there, then when 1 hit they could not whine like a 3 year old
I like Burch also and could live with Sawyer, just worried too many DE"s
(04-25-2025, 11:00 PM)Joelist Wrote: [ -> ]If they had taken Ratledge in 2 and Knight in 3 I'd have been cool with it. It's the same bad habit of them locking in on players to the total exclusion of any thought of how to get to the same place in a more advantageous way.
Oklahoma State LB Nick Martin was just drafted at #75 to the 49ers.
(04-25-2025, 11:00 PM)Joelist Wrote: [ -> ]If they had taken Ratledge in 2 and Knight in 3 I'd have been cool with it. It's the same bad habit of them locking in on players to the total exclusion of any thought of how to get to the same place in a more advantageous way.
Knight would not have been there, Martin was picked prior to our 81st pick
(04-25-2025, 11:02 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: [ -> ]Nice to see someone put their picks out there, not surprised it was you
If they put 15 guys out there, then when 1 hit they could not whine like a 3 year old
I like Burch also and could live with Sawyer, just worried too many DE"s
Burch could play 3-Tech
I would not mind a trade back of 10 picks to get an extra pick here
