Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
If we lose to Josh Johnson
#41
(12-26-2021, 06:25 PM)Sled21 Wrote: Johnson did not look good today because we were the opponent. He looked good because he played a whale of a game. Give the man credit.

Johnson definitely put some good tape out there today and probably extended his NFL career another year.  However, it didn't matter if Baltimore had Lamar, Mahomes, or Joe Montana in his prime.  They weren't winning the way the offense was scoring.

Sad thing is, Lamar has now been completely exposed with the Ravens offense not missing a beat with Huntley and now Johnson.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
#42
(12-26-2021, 06:29 PM)Whatever Wrote: Johnson definitely put some good tape out there today and probably extended his NFL career another year.  However, it didn't matter if Baltimore had Lamar, Mahomes, or Joe Montana in his prime.  They weren't winning the way the offense was scoring.

Sad thing is, Lamar has now been completely exposed with the Ravens offense not missing a beat with Huntley and now Johnson.

The Rat offense is a LOT better without Lamar than with him. Amazing what QBs who can throw accurately can do for you...
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
#43
(12-26-2021, 11:52 AM)Whacked Wrote: My sentients exactly.

A solid coach would be game-planning around exposing Josh’s weaknesses and overall lackluster status. Not that tall of a task.

We should absolutely win this game w their #1 and #2 QB out.

Not doing so screams Taylor incompetence; notwithstanding the players’ inabilities to perform.

For this particular game and all of variables discussed above, no excuse is acceptable.

hmmm!!!!
How did the Zt offense do today? Man I have no idea why some like to be so negative prior to a game being played
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
I am so ready for 2024 season. I love pro football and hoping for a great Bengals year. Regardless, always remember it is a game and entertainment. 
Reply/Quote





Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)