Thread Rating:
  • 4 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
***(Wild Card) PLAYOFF GameDay Thread - Raiders @ Bengals***
(01-15-2022, 08:41 PM)sloSTI Wrote: How are these refs this bad

Aren't these the same refs in that Packer-Seahawks game?

Defender caught the ball, receiver caught the defender, therefore - TOUCHDOWN!!!
#WhoDey
#RuleTheJungle
#TheyGottaPlayUs
#WeAreYourSuperBowl



Reply/Quote
Refs decided to determine game outcome apparently.
Reply/Quote
Looked like he caught it then fumbled to me.

After that second foot is down its a catch
-Housh
Reply/Quote
no catch
 
Winning makes believers of us all


They didn't win and we don't beleive
 




Reply/Quote
(01-15-2022, 08:43 PM)RunKijanaRun Wrote: You cannot tell me this isn’t bullshit

They waste NO time confirming the Raider catch and give Oak every chance to reset and go on a horrible call. Where was that NY review these announcers keep masturbating about? Sure as shit isn’t helping us.

If they confirm this catch, storm the ***** field.

You don't live in Cleveland, you live in Cincinnati!
Reply/Quote
(01-15-2022, 08:38 PM)Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 Wrote: Burrow missed Boyd for a TD. 

Higgins down the line you mean? Thought it was Tee anyway. I dunno if I'd say that was 'missed'. A decent chance of a TD sure but nowhere near as bad as not scoring TDs when getting the ball at their 20.
1
Reply/Quote
(01-15-2022, 08:44 PM)Housh Wrote: Looked like he caught it then fumbled to me.

After that second foot is down its a catch

Definitely incomplete
Reply/Quote
NBCs rules guy also said no catch so we ain’t just making this up
Reply/Quote
(01-15-2022, 08:44 PM)Interceptor Wrote: Aren't these the same refs in that Packer-Seahawks game?

Defender caught the ball, receiver caught the defender, therefore - TOUCHDOWN!!!

Honestly, I have no idea
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
(01-15-2022, 08:43 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Because the Raiders were hurrying up to snap the ball there. They weren't before.

Not a conspiracy, just basic logic.

Nah man, you're just buying into what Big Logic is trying to make us all think! 


Ninja
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
1
Reply/Quote
Going to be overturned and a punt, we need a Td here and it will feel really good.
Reply/Quote
(01-15-2022, 08:43 PM)RunKijanaRun Wrote: You cannot tell me this isn’t bullshit

They waste NO time confirming the Raider catch and give Oak every chance to reset and go on a horrible call. Where was that NY review these announcers keep masturbating about? Sure as shit isn’t helping us.

If they confirm this catch, storm the ***** field.

Exactly this. You can't play favs and say when to review a play for free.
Reply/Quote
Q the Benny hill theme

Sent from my BE2026 using Tapatalk
Reply/Quote
Hey they got it right!!!!
[Image: hFcJI4.png]
Reply/Quote
(01-15-2022, 08:43 PM)pally Wrote: Ogunjobi is questionable with a right foot injury

dang it..we are getting thin at DT, who do we have left? Mike D and BJ?

INCOMPLETE! 
Reply/Quote
(01-15-2022, 08:44 PM)CloeHokie Wrote: They get a free review and we have to challenge? Dont change the way you officiate.

It is not a conspiracy, the Raiders went to rush the snap the second time. They didn't the first time 
____________________________________________________________

[Image: 9c9oza.jpg]
Reply/Quote
(01-15-2022, 08:44 PM)TheCincinnatiKid Wrote: Higgins down the line you mean? Thought it was Tee anyway. I dunno if I'd say that was 'missed'. A decent chance of a TD sure but nowhere near as bad as not scoring TDs when getting the ball at their 20.

We had the ball on their 20 and their 45. Both FGs. That will eat Burrow if we lose somehow. I think Zac had some suspect playcalling on both those drives though.
Reply/Quote
Let's break it open Joey!

Reply/Quote
Now get a stinking TD!
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
How the hell did some of you neanderthals think that was a catch?
If you see something suspicious, say something suspicious.

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 9 Guest(s)