Posts: 1,016
Threads: 36
Reputation:
9268
Joined: Apr 2021
Tate is plenty serviceable as a #4 receiver. For Atlanta, he will probably be the #1 or #2. The rest of that WR room is brutal: https://www.ourlads.com/nfldepthcharts/depthchart/ATL
Good for him getting that opportunity.
Clearly he lacks the speed or separation ability to be a consistent outside threat, but in the right situation he can be effective.
Posts: 2,290
Threads: 15
Reputation:
9226
Joined: Apr 2017
He was never that impressive but he was a 7th round selection who did contribute some when he had the opportunity and not banged up.
Posts: 1,774
Threads: 0
Reputation:
7146
Joined: Mar 2017
His speed was an issue before Zac now he just does not fit the system. Good luck hope you do well unless your playing us.
Posts: 5,902
Threads: 10
Reputation:
25670
Joined: Apr 2020
(03-28-2022, 09:27 PM)The Clapp Wrote: You said he “wasnt good”.. technically you said he fooled everyone. I gave you an example on why i thought you were wrong. You counter by saying.. yeah, but this guy is fast… so how does Ross being fast make, tate a bad player?
Ross was fast, but he never fooled anyone for long. Tate being tall still has some of you fooled. The guy isnt productive
(03-28-2022, 09:31 PM)NATI BENGALS Wrote: I think you would be OK with him as a #2. But he is constantly banged up and not good on special teams.
in the canadian football league? Yes.
Posts: 8,537
Threads: 28
Reputation:
97093
Joined: May 2015
Best wishes to Mr. Tate on his new gig.
For the Bengals it's time to infuse some new blood at that spot anyway.
The water tastes funny when you're far from your home,
yet it's only the thirsty that hunger to roam.
Roam the Jungle !
Posts: 28,864
Threads: 40
Reputation:
128448
Joined: May 2015
Location: Parts Unknown, PA
(03-28-2022, 09:39 PM)Frank Booth Wrote: Ross was fast, but he never fooled anyone for long. Tate being tall still has some of you fooled. The guy isnt productive
in the canadian football league? Yes.
I wouldn't mind it if the Stampeders had him at #2 behind Reggie Begeleton. As for his time here, well he was a 7th round pick and his stats here look like those of a decent 7th round pick.
Posts: 17,573
Threads: 239
Reputation:
141097
Joined: Oct 2015
(03-28-2022, 09:31 PM)NATI BENGALS Wrote: I think you would be OK with him as a #2. But he is constantly banged up and not good on special teams.
If Auden Tate is your #2, your season is already over.
____________________________________________________________
1
Posts: 5,902
Threads: 10
Reputation:
25670
Joined: Apr 2020
(03-28-2022, 10:40 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: If Auden Tate is your #2, your season is already over.
and this is why atlanta will be 2-15
Posts: 476
Threads: 1
Reputation:
2402
Joined: Apr 2017
(03-28-2022, 09:39 PM)Frank Booth Wrote: Ross was fast, but he never fooled anyone for long. Tate being tall still has some of you fooled. The guy isnt productive
in the canadian football league? Yes.
I wouldn't say that Tate sucked. He is a niche receiver. If you need sure hands, possession, jump balls, and block out routes, Tate excels at it. Does he fit with what we got going on here? Nope. Need speed, need separation. Tate has a lot of highlight reel contested catches because of the lack of speed and separation.
Did he fool me? Nope. He is what he is.
BTW, Tate contributed more than Ross to this team.
I wish Tate the best in Atlanta.
Posts: 7,310
Threads: 52
Reputation:
50700
Joined: May 2015
Huge news! I'm sure Tate got that Mike Williams money, so he'll count big time towards comp picks next year.
This also means the competition for the prestigious Golden Binns Award is wide open. Respect to the 4x champ.
Posts: 5,634
Threads: 36
Reputation:
36574
Joined: May 2015
Location: Vancouver, WA
Good luck to Tate.
You can always trust an dishonest man to be dishonest. Honestly, it's the honest ones you have to look out for.
"Winning makes believers of us all"-Paul Brown
Posts: 7,310
Threads: 52
Reputation:
50700
Joined: May 2015
(03-28-2022, 06:19 PM)CloeHokie Wrote: This is why we don't need to draft a WR early. Tate is good/decent. He was buried here. Just like any WR we draft. Inactive or barely any catches. What happens when you are 4 or 5 on the depth chart.
Tate isn't good, by any stretch. He has a career 51.7% catch % and 6.8 yards/target. That's why he was buried on the depth chart.
Posts: 11,648
Threads: 19
Reputation:
80798
Joined: May 2015
Location: Where Mr. Kotter was before returning
(03-29-2022, 10:24 AM)Whatever Wrote: Tate isn't good, by any stretch. He has a career 51.7% catch % and 6.8 yards/target. That's why he was buried on the depth chart.
This... The guy caught some awkward lookin' throws from Dalton while he was running for his life.. I do believe everybody was hurt at that point in the season of 2019 too. The guy was a 7th round pick and managed to hang around. That's commendable.
Poo Dey
Posts: 7,310
Threads: 52
Reputation:
50700
Joined: May 2015
(03-28-2022, 07:00 PM)ochocincos Wrote: You could also argue though that if he was that good, Bengals wouldn't have spent two high draft picks on WRs the previous two years.
His prime opportunity to shine came a couple years ago, and he didn't do enough to convince coaching staff to make him the WR2/3.
The Philly game in '20 doomed him, imo. He had just had his agent there yapping in the media about the Bengals not utilizing him. The Eagles had undersized CB's and the Bengals went with jump balls to Tate on three different occasions in the red zone. He lost every one and cost the Bengals the W. Can't be a me first player that can't produce.
Posts: 40,628
Threads: 1,062
Joined: May 2015
People think I did not like Tate because i was always arguing with the guys who were ga-ga over him, but he was a solid back-up possession WR.
Can't stick on our roster because he did not play special teams.
Posts: 14,309
Threads: 294
Reputation:
31677
Joined: May 2015
We should all boycott the team for letting the greatest WR to ever ride the pine go.. Who wants to be the first to stand outside in front of PBS with a big picket sign reading, "How in hell could you let Auden Tate go? OK, so he wasn't that great, but...uhmmm.. You know!" ?
In the immortal words of my old man, "Wait'll you get to be my age!"
Chicago sounds rough to the maker of verse, but the one comfort we have is Cincinnati sounds worse. ~Oliver Wendal Holmes Sr.
Posts: 5,390
Threads: 60
Reputation:
41408
Joined: Mar 2018
Location: Oklahoma
(03-29-2022, 01:12 AM)Yogo Wrote: BTW, Tate contributed more than Ross to this team.
I'm not sure how. Ross had more yards and nearly 6x the TDs that Tate had in his career here.
Posts: 13,813
Threads: 135
Reputation:
93232
Joined: May 2015
(03-29-2022, 10:32 AM)fredtoast Wrote: People think I did not like Tate because i was always arguing with the guys who were ga-ga over him, but he was a solid back-up possession WR.
Can't stick on our roster because he did not play special teams.
This was pretty much the case. He is a 4th to 6th receiver on the depth chart that couldn't contribute on special teams which meant he didn't get to dress often.
Posts: 7,310
Threads: 52
Reputation:
50700
Joined: May 2015
(03-29-2022, 11:39 AM)KillerGoose Wrote: I'm not sure how. Ross had more yards and nearly 6x the TDs that Tate had in his career here.
They had nearly the same number of targets in their Bengals runs, too(123-118).
Posts: 28,586
Threads: 357
Reputation:
248558
Joined: Aug 2016
(03-29-2022, 01:12 AM)Yogo Wrote: I wouldn't say that Tate sucked. He is a niche receiver. If you need sure hands, possession, jump balls, and block out routes, Tate excels at it. Does he fit with what we got going on here? Nope. Need speed, need separation. Tate has a lot of highlight reel contested catches because of the lack of speed and separation.
Did he fool me? Nope. He is what he is.
BTW, Tate contributed more than Ross to this team.
I wish Tate the best in Atlanta.
Not even close to being true. John Ross had a season where he scored 7 TD’s. Auden Tate probably won’t have that many for his entire career.
|