(12-16-2015, 04:10 PM)GMDino Wrote: I'm sure that's what you meant.  

Probably just want to "paint" him.  ""

Is that what your source (mama) thinks?

(12-16-2015, 04:11 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: Is that what your source (mama) thinks?

At least my source is real.   

Probably knows more about football than you too!  

(12-16-2015, 04:23 PM)GMDino Wrote: At least my source is real.   

Probably knows more about football than you too!  

Oh snap!!!

It appears that the NFL does not believe it was a "Dirty" or "intentional" Hit either.

Adam Schefter ‏2 minutes ago
"After reviewing play in question, NFL will not fine Bengals LB Vontaze Burfict for his hit on Ben Roethlisberger, per agent Audie Attar."

(12-16-2015, 04:50 PM)JungleGal50 Wrote: It appears that the NFL does not believe it was a "Dirty" or "intentional Hit either.  

Adam Schefter ‏2 minutes ago
"After reviewing play in question, NFL will not fine Bengals LB Vontaze Burfict for his hit on Ben Roethlisberger, per agent Audie Attar."

It's a conspiracy

(12-16-2015, 04:50 PM)JungleGal50 Wrote: It appears that the NFL does not believe it was a "Dirty" or "intentional" Hit either.  

Adam Schefter ‏2 minutes ago
"After reviewing play in question, NFL will not fine Bengals LB Vontaze Burfict for his hit on Ben Roethlisberger, per agent Audie Attar."

Whoopsie. 

(12-16-2015, 04:50 PM)JungleGal50 Wrote: It appears that the NFL does not believe it was a "Dirty" or "intentional" Hit either.  

Adam Schefter ‏2 minutes ago
"After reviewing play in question, NFL will not fine Bengals LB Vontaze Burfict for his hit on Ben Roethlisberger, per agent Audie Attar."

(12-16-2015, 04:50 PM)JungleGal50 Wrote: It appears that the NFL does not believe it was a "Dirty" or "intentional" Hit either.  

Adam Schefter ‏2 minutes ago
"After reviewing play in question, NFL will not fine Bengals LB Vontaze Burfict for his hit on Ben Roethlisberger, per agent Audie Attar."

 Let it flow boys, let it flow...

(12-16-2015, 04:50 PM)JungleGal50 Wrote: It appears that the NFL does not believe it was a "Dirty" or "intentional" Hit either.  

Adam Schefter ‏2 minutes ago
"After reviewing play in question, NFL will not fine Bengals LB Vontaze Burfict for his hit on Ben Roethlisberger, per agent Audie Attar."

What was it Harrison and Ward defenders use to say, "He wasn't punished so it was a clean hit"? Something like that, right?

I guess by their own logic the hit by Burfict was just a good, clean hit.

(12-16-2015, 04:50 PM)JungleGal50 Wrote: It appears that the NFL does not believe it was a "Dirty" or "intentional" Hit either.  

Adam Schefter ‏2 minutes ago
"After reviewing play in question, NFL will not fine Bengals LB Vontaze Burfict for his hit on Ben Roethlisberger, per agent Audie Attar."

Not really a surprise.

But it will make Bengals fans feel better so there's that.

(12-16-2015, 05:07 PM)GMDino Wrote: Not really a surprise.

But it will make Bengals fans feel better so there's that.

I just hope this will dry Big Ben's eyes so he can start to focus on the Broncos instead of the Bengals.

(12-16-2015, 05:07 PM)GMDino Wrote: Not really a surprise.

But it will make Bengals fans feel better so there's that.

I only get satisfaction knowing how mad this makes the Steeler fans.

(12-16-2015, 04:50 PM)JungleGal50 Wrote: It appears that the NFL does not believe it was a "Dirty" or "intentional" Hit either.  

Adam Schefter ‏2 minutes ago
"After reviewing play in question, NFL will not fine Bengals LB Vontaze Burfict for his hit on Ben Roethlisberger, per agent Audie Attar."

As opposed to pretty much every 'dirty' hit Harrison ever made in Pittsburgh. Crazy how that works.

It's obviously not a reputation thing - must just be Burfict isn't as big a scum bag as Harrison and Big Ben is a Big *****.

But it's over with. The Steelers and their fans were wrong. Good luck the rest of the way - and watch out for those dirty(?) hits on your pansy ass QB.
 
Look out everyone - jokes about a fluke thumb injury are incoming.

NFL reviewed the tape, found Burfict was indeed pushed into ben. But ben said he doesn't believe Burfict was pushed. So ben lied? Big surprised there.

(12-16-2015, 10:07 AM)tigerseye Wrote: Is it me or is the picture that you just posted a picture of Big Ben crying with a Bengals jersey on.

 Its you crying with a bengals jersey on.

So whatcha say Steeler fan? Mark Brunnell on ESPN more than once called Burfect a dirty player. But then he was a quarterback. The interesting thing is that Teddy Bruschi, not normally a Bengals fan, would not admit that Burfect's play was dirty. And yes, I know Brushci was a linebacker. Brunnell was standing right next to Teddy when he said it. Apparently the NFL didn't agree with Brunnell either.

(12-16-2015, 09:09 PM)BengalRed Wrote: So whatcha say Steeler fan? Mark Brunnell on ESPN more than once called Burfect a dirty player. But then he was a quarterback. The interesting thing is that Teddy Bruschi, not normally a Bengals fan, would not admit that Burfect's play was dirty. And yes, I know Brushci was a linebacker. Brunnell was standing right next to Teddy when he said it. Apparently the NFL didn't agree with Brunnell either.

Do you realize how stupid it looks when you cite Bruschi as a source on who is considered a dirty player?

So has Mitchell not been fined or is it just not announced?

This could get ugly. For the love of God fine the guy $10k just to keep these Bengal fans from getting out of hand.

(12-16-2015, 09:24 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Do you realize how stupid it looks when you cite Bruschi as a source on who is considered a dirty player?

Are you saying Bruschi was a dirty player?

(12-16-2015, 07:18 PM)Beaker Wrote: NFL reviewed the tape, found Burfict was indeed pushed into ben. But ben said he doesn't believe Burfict was pushed. So ben lied? Big surprised there.

You mean the drama queen with the "migraines" and all of those "injuries" lied?