(04-28-2023, 01:00 AM)casear2727 Wrote: Im shocked it took them that long to let you in, maybe they will kick your butt out at lightening speed?

Already happened, lol 

(04-28-2023, 01:05 AM)MasonDT70 Wrote: I would've preferred a trade back and grab someone like debawore as a high upside pick and an inside rusher is more of a need imo than edge. Just not a fan of how the board fell. 

Adebowore has as much experience at DT as Murphy. He played on the edge in college with limited interior pass rush attempts same as Murphy.

(04-28-2023, 01:02 AM)Joelist Wrote: The pass rush problem was interior not so much edge. With basically no pressure inside QBs were able to step up easily. Meanwhile the major issue on offense of utter lack of explosiveness in the backfield is still present.

Still 6 more rounds to address other areas…

(04-28-2023, 01:04 AM)casear2727 Wrote: We would have to have moved up to 318 to get Kancey. That would have cost us our #1 and #2 picks this draft at minimum, on a guy who is a tremendous risk of being a bust at his size.  The AD comparisons are not as close as people would like to suggest when it comes to production and arm length.  Too expensive for me.

Kancey was a reach with his short arms. Didn't want him until the 2nd round as a prospect thought. 

This isn't college.

(04-28-2023, 01:05 AM)MasonDT70 Wrote: I would've preferred a trade back and grab someone like debawore as a high upside pick and an inside rusher is more of a need imo than edge. Just not a fan of how the board fell. 

Well, we will find out. Murphy has upside of Myles garret, that’s really high.

(04-28-2023, 01:07 AM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Kancey was a reach with his short arms. Didn't want him until the 2nd round as a prospect thought. 

This isn't college.

oh c'mon dude. you'd be over the moon if cincy landed Kancey

(04-28-2023, 01:04 AM)casear2727 Wrote: We would have to have moved up to 318 to get Kancey. That would have cost us our #1 and #2 picks this draft at minimum, on a guy who is a tremendous risk of being a bust at his size.  The AD comparisons are not as close as people would like to suggest when it comes to production and arm length.  Too expensive for me.

Would depend on what jonahs value is. But yeah likely too expensive. Was a dream anyways

(04-28-2023, 01:09 AM)Frank Booth Wrote: oh c'mon dude. you'd be over the moon if cincy landed Kancey

Not me drafting Kancey is betting on a outlying rotational only player.

(04-28-2023, 01:08 AM)Bengalbug Wrote: Well, we will find out.  Murphy has upside of Myles garret, that’s really high.

I like the rashan gary comp I heard, he's a good player. Anything close to garret would be awesome. 

(04-28-2023, 12:39 AM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: The pass rush was also terrible with Hendrickson on the field. They are a highly paid group that needs to just figure it out and improve from within.

I also remember how awful our TEs were last year without Hurst on the field and the only change they made was replacing Hurst with a guy who missed more games in his first 4 seasons than Tyler Eifert. TE now is going to be an absolute drain on the offense's ability in 2023 anytime they're on the field.

It's only night 1, geez relax!

(04-28-2023, 01:10 AM)Synric Wrote: Not me drafting Kancey is betting on a outlying rotational only player.

yes, fine. I was referring to Nate

(04-28-2023, 01:07 AM)Synric Wrote: Adebowore has as much experience at DT as Murphy. He played on the edge in college with limited interior pass rush attempts same as Murphy.

Both athletic freaks and I prefer not to gamble on mostly pure athleticism in the 1st. 

PFF had Murphy as the 17th ranked player over all, McShay had him at 23 and Jeremiah at 21 so people were fairly high on him. Definitely wasn’t a reach and will be a real need position next year.

(04-28-2023, 01:09 AM)Frank Booth Wrote: oh c'mon dude. you'd be over the moon if cincy landed Kancey

**** off. Never liked Kancey.

(04-28-2023, 01:15 AM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: **** off. Never liked Kancey.

Then how do you explain mocking him to us in your Mock draft hmmm?

http://thebengalsboard.com/Thread-Nate-s-2nd-Mock-of-2023

(04-28-2023, 12:55 AM)Whatever Wrote: The day I need Joe Goodberry to do my thinking for me...

There's a lot of people on here that do swear on Goodberry. I don't get it

(04-28-2023, 01:20 AM)CarolinaBengalFanGuy Wrote: Then how do you explain mocking him to us in your Mock draft hmmm?

http://thebengalsboard.com/Thread-Nate-s-2nd-Mock-of-2023

.....Nate had Mazi Smith. Are you feeling ok?

Everyone knows I was a Mayer homer, but it’s a passing league and our pass rush was atrocious, so I’m actually happy with the pick.

If he falls to us in two, I’m praying we take Mayer, but I wasn’t too upset with the pick.

anyone able to find the defensive stats for 2022 that showed % of snaps with 5 defensive linemen? Been looking but no luck so far
.

(04-28-2023, 01:21 AM)Frank Booth Wrote: .....Nate had Mazi Smith. Are you feeling ok?