Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What if we go 0-3?
(7 hours ago)Bengalfan4life27c Wrote: I usually support Tobin. WTS He takes 100 percent of the blame for this dumpster fire of a DLine. It was malpractice for a NFL team to go into the season with the Dline players we had available. Can't blame this on money either. We could have traded Tee got compensation with money that was freed up sign a couple decent Dlinemen. This Defense might be historically bad aand it's because of the incompetence and arrogance of the front office thinking this dline would be competitive. Take away Tre and Georgia's Dline is more talented.

That's just it. They won't trade a player that wants traded. Then, other players will want traded.

But yes...trading Tee and getting say a couple 2nd Round picks and then freeing up what $20 million to spend makes sense.
Reply/Quote
(7 hours ago)Fan_in_Kettering Wrote: …which isn’t happening.  The secondary plays a soft zone and there is no pass rush whatsoever.  Under those conditions Andy Dalton will carve up this defense like a Thanksgiving turkey.

Dalton's play against the Bengals and it's a 1:00 game....
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]

Quote:"Success doesn’t mean every single move they make is good" ~ Anonymous 
"Let not the dumb have to educate" ~ jj22
Reply/Quote
What’s better than losing to a shit team?

Doing it on Monday Night Football so the whole world can see it.
-Housh
Reply/Quote
(7 hours ago)THE PISTONS Wrote: That's just it. They won't trade a player that wants traded. Then, other players will want traded.

But yes...trading Tee and getting say a couple 2nd Round picks and then freeing up what $20 million to spend makes sense.

Yeah they didn't want to trade Tee because they needed him this year. But I was thinking about this awhile back when having discussions about the Bengals not treating players properly. Why do other teams so willingly cave to trade demands? I always kind of thought they just caved. But it's really about just doing the best for all involved. Letting a player go somewhere he feels wanted while getting some compensation in return. Instead the Bengals just ask that player to accept and struggle thru it while not wanting to do too many offseason moves so you don't lose the compensatory pick.
Reply/Quote
(09-18-2024, 05:43 PM)HarleyDog Wrote: What does that do to you? What does that do to the team? Do we say "seasons over?"  Does that leave a salty taste in the city? Does it leave a salty taste in the coaching staff and the FO against Chase's hold-in, or Tee's weakness, or our weak WR depth, or our weak RB squad, or our new OC? Does it put pressure on Zac or Lou?

Any given Sunday. What do you say?

Ready to move on from coaches who cant get their players ready for game day
Reply/Quote
(Yesterday, 04:45 PM)reuben.ahmed Wrote: I wish we had Tomlin.

The real question is what if we go 0-4?

No, you don't. Every Steeler fan that I know doesn't like Tomlin and holds him personally responsible for their lack of championships in the past 15 years. 
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]

Volson is meh, but I like him, and he has far exceeded my expectations

-Frank Booth 1/9/23
Reply/Quote
Next up, the Andy Dalton revenge Bengal beat down! Ninja
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]

Volson is meh, but I like him, and he has far exceeded my expectations

-Frank Booth 1/9/23
Reply/Quote
(6 hours ago)Housh Wrote: What’s better than losing to a shit team?

Doing it on Monday Night Football so the whole world can see it.

Thing is though, the Commanders were generally thought of as a shit team, but they're not. They are 2-0 and haven't had to punt in two straight games and are on top of their Division. They are playing good football.
Reply/Quote
(6 hours ago)SunsetBengal Wrote: Next up, the Andy Dalton revenge Bengal beat down!  Ninja

And after that, Jayden Daniels Sr.
Reply/Quote
(7 hours ago)jj22 Wrote: Dalton's play against the Bengals and it's a 1:00 game....

When Sunday-1:00-Andy is on you're in for some trouble.  

(6 hours ago)reuben.ahmed Wrote: And after that, Jayden Daniels Sr.

Right, last night we got Luke Skywalker and October 6 Darth Vader comes to town  Sad
Reply/Quote
(6 hours ago)Sled21 Wrote: Thing is though, the Commanders were generally thought of as a shit team, but they're not. They are 2-0 and haven't had to punt in two straight games and are on top of their Division. They are playing good football.

Weren't you also saying the Patriots "aren't that bad" or whatever after they beat us? Just because a team beats us and it's early in the season so it makes their record look OK, it doesn't mean they are good. 
Reply/Quote
(6 hours ago)Sled21 Wrote: Thing is though, the Commanders were generally thought of as a shit team, but they're not. They are 2-0 and haven't had to punt in two straight games and are on top of their Division. They are playing good football.

Yeah, Jayden Daniels played flawless too. Hard to beat those guys when he plays like that. I didn't see a shit team last night at all.

Lots of talent all over the place, Scary Terry along with the rest of those weapons on Offense and Jonathan Allen and that D is not shit.

Bottom line is we couldn't force Daniels to screw up and turn the ball over honestly. It was a wild game where our Offense played very 
good and our Defense made a lot of plays but couldn't stop them when it mattered. I blame CTB a bit for this loss. Saw him talking shit
before this game and it was the last thing we needed to see when we hadn't even won a game yet.

One thing I can say though, if there is a team that could go 0-3 and make the Playoffs I think it is these Bengals if they can stop the run
soon. We actually have a running game and our weapons back, Mims looked good except for one play etc.
Reply/Quote
(5 hours ago)Lucius Cincinnatus Wrote: Weren't you also saying the Patriots "aren't that bad" or whatever after they beat us? Just because a team beats us and it's early in the season so it makes their record look OK, it doesn't mean they are good. 

Nope, I don't think so, at least I don't remember that. They did not have to punt against the Giants either. A football team playing two straight games without their punter ever seeing the field doesn't mean they are bad. 
Reply/Quote
(4 hours ago)Sled21 Wrote: Nope, I don't think so, at least I don't remember that. They did not have to punt against the Giants either. A football team playing two straight games without their punter ever seeing the field doesn't mean they are bad. 

They will win 7 games. They aren't good. They also couldn't score a touchdown against a bad Giants team. It was a terrible loss last night to a below average football team at home. 
Reply/Quote
(4 hours ago)Lucius Cincinnatus Wrote: They will win 7 games. They aren't good. They also couldn't score a touchdown against a bad Giants team. It was a terrible loss last night to a below average football team at home. 

Ok, I guess we'll see at the end of the season Nostradamus... Ninja
Reply/Quote
(6 hours ago)SunsetBengal Wrote: Next up, the Andy Dalton revenge Bengal beat down!  Ninja

You know it. He probably will throw for 400 yards and 4TD's in his revenge game. Crap I'm too damn depressed today after the fiasco last night to even concentrate on work today. Our D is nasty, and not in a good way.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)