Posts: 232
Threads: 1
Reputation:
384
Joined: Jul 2015
(07-16-2016, 09:31 PM)OBX Bengal Wrote: This is a fun AJ McCarron 2016 Bengal highlight video, (especially if you like Dire Straits)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_p2BJCrC48
I have never laughed so hard in my life. Just saw this link, watched the vid, scrolled down to comments and saw some darsh bashing McCarron.
Guess who it was?
Guess who's so obsessed with trashing this guy that he couldn't help himself?
Quote:brownshoeT21 month ago
best backup in the NFL? lol, you guys are funny.
Quote:brownshoeT23 weeks ago
+The L Taker
I think you severely overrate McCarron. What has McCarron ever done that has been impressive? Him having trouble scoring any points unless it's on the opponents side of the field? Him holding onto the ball forever and getting happy feet and having almost the amount of sacks Dalton had when McCarron only played 4 games? Having about a 30% conversion rate on 3rd down? What has McCarron done? I see the team carrying him on their back, and that's about it. If McCarron was on a team like the 2011 Bengals the offense would be dead last.
Total clownshoes.
AJ's having a fine preseason. Nice to have 2 QBs who can sling it.
Posts: 4,390
Threads: 52
Reputation:
11979
Joined: May 2015
Location: Cincinnati, OH
(08-20-2016, 12:02 AM)BigSeph Wrote: I have never laughed so hard in my life. Just saw this link, watched the vid, scrolled down to comments and saw some darsh bashing McCarron.
Guess who it was?
Guess who's so obsessed with trashing this guy that he couldn't help himself?
Total clownshoes.
AJ's having a fine preseason. Nice to have 2 QBs who can sling it.
I wish McCarron could play well in the regular season or the post season, and not in games where it doesn't matter one bit, and against people who won't even be in the league in a few weeks.
Posts: 15,116
Threads: 221
Reputation:
147378
Joined: May 2015
(08-20-2016, 12:02 AM)BigSeph Wrote: Guess who's so obsessed with trashing this guy that he couldn't help himself?
Not surprised by the attacker, not surprised by the defender either.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
Posts: 3,152
Threads: 258
Reputation:
5159
Joined: May 2015
Macaroni isn't going anywhere. The Bengals need him if Dalton gets hurt. Just like baseball carries 2 good catchers, NFL needs to carry 2 good QB's these days. I'd like to see Marvin Lewis put Macaroni in more during garbage times.
Who Dey!
Posts: 232
Threads: 1
Reputation:
384
Joined: Jul 2015
(08-20-2016, 12:16 AM)Shake n Blake Wrote: Not surprised by the attacker, not surprised by the defender either.
Got no problem standing up for AJM on the internets.
Glad to do it.
Posts: 17,065
Threads: 237
Reputation:
133067
Joined: Oct 2015
Jimmy Garoppolo is looking awfully darn good.
____________________________________________________________
Posts: 4,390
Threads: 52
Reputation:
11979
Joined: May 2015
Location: Cincinnati, OH
(08-20-2016, 12:59 AM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Jimmy Garoppolo is looking awfully darn good.
Dak Prescott is looking really good too.
Posts: 17,065
Threads: 237
Reputation:
133067
Joined: Oct 2015
(08-20-2016, 01:09 AM)Brownshoe Wrote: Dak Prescott is looking really good too.
Didn't know about it until you mentioned it, but damn. He's tearing it up. 22/27 (81.5%), 338 yards, 4 TD/0 INT.. 5 rushes, 41 yards, 2 TD.
____________________________________________________________
Posts: 15,116
Threads: 221
Reputation:
147378
Joined: May 2015
Fwiw, Tim Tebow tore up the preseason for the Eagles last year.
21 of 36, 286 yards, 2 TDs, 1 INT (90.7 rating)
14 carries, 82 yards, 1 TD
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
Posts: 40,628
Threads: 1,062
Joined: May 2015
(08-20-2016, 12:59 AM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Jimmy Garoppolo is looking awfully darn good.
No kidding
That's yummy.
:drool:
Posts: 11,765
Threads: 706
Reputation:
54790
Joined: Jun 2015
(08-20-2016, 01:21 AM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Didn't know about it until you mentioned it, but damn. He's tearing it up. 22/27 (81.5%), 338 yards, 4 TD/0 INT.. 5 rushes, 41 yards, 2 TD.
Great numbers against defenses who are not scheming against him and are not playing their starters against him 100%. Let's see how he does if pressed into a regular season game (once Romo is hurt........again) before we anoint the guy as the next Cam Newton.
I am so ready for 2024 season. I love pro football and hoping for a great Bengals year. Regardless, always remember it is a game and entertainment.
Posts: 3,989
Threads: 44
Reputation:
27912
Joined: May 2015
Location: ¯\(°.o)/¯
(07-16-2016, 09:31 PM)OBX Bengal Wrote: This is a fun AJ McCarron 2016 Bengal highlight video, (especially if you like Dire Straits)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_p2BJCrC48
This video just makes me miss Marvin Jones. Boyd, you better step up for us.
Posts: 17,065
Threads: 237
Reputation:
133067
Joined: Oct 2015
(08-20-2016, 01:00 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: Fwiw, Tim Tebow tore up the preseason for the Eagles last year.
21 of 36, 286 yards, 2 TDs, 1 INT (90.7 rating)
14 carries, 82 yards, 1 TD
Those are good-ish numbers, but not really the same, Shake. Plus it's comparing a 6th year 1st round pick QB to a 1st year 4th round pick QB.
Plus "tore up" isn't exactly the words used for a 58.3% completion in preseason. Also forgot to mention that's in 4 games rather than the numbers I gave for 2. 3 TDs in 4 games =/= 6 TDs in 2 games.
(08-20-2016, 01:19 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: Great numbers against defenses who are not scheming against him and are not playing their starters against him 100%. Let's see how he does if pressed into a regular season game (once Romo is hurt........again) before we anoint the guy as the next Cam Newton.
Not annointing him anything, and I haven't seen enough from the kid to say for sure that he'll run away from a fumble in the fourth quarter of the SB, so I won't insult him by calling him Cam Newton, either.
Just saying, damn impressive for a 4th round pick rookie, even if it's preseason.
____________________________________________________________
Posts: 15,116
Threads: 221
Reputation:
147378
Joined: May 2015
(08-20-2016, 02:50 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Those are good-ish numbers, but not really the same, Shake. Plus it's comparing a 6th year 1st round pick QB to a 1st year 4th round pick QB.
Plus "tore up" isn't exactly the words used for a 58.3% completion in preseason. Also forgot to mention that's in 4 games rather than the numbers I gave for 2. 3 TDs in 4 games =/= 6 TDs in 2 games.
My point wasn't even aimed at you in particular. More the idea that preseason tells you much of anything about a QB. No blitzing, vanilla routes, vanilla schemes, playing with/against backups.
I'd have to disagree that a 90.7 rating and 8 YPA, with only 1 INT in 36 attempts (plus the plays made with his feet) wasn't impressive. Tebow was splitting time with Barkley competing for 3rd QB though, so obviously he wasn't seeing the amount of snaps Prescott is. Plus he wasn't even with a team the previous year, and had to learn his 4th offense in 4 seasons. So I'm not sure Tebow had a huge advantage with his situation.
Either way, my point is that we should probably take preseason stats with some grain of salt.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
Posts: 17,065
Threads: 237
Reputation:
133067
Joined: Oct 2015
(08-20-2016, 04:30 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: My point wasn't even aimed at you in particular. More the idea that preseason tells you much of anything about a QB. No blitzing, vanilla routes, vanilla schemes, playing with/against backups.
I'd have to disagree that a 90.7 rating and 8 YPA, with only 1 INT in 36 attempts (plus the plays made with his feet) wasn't impressive. Tebow was splitting time with Barkley competing for 3rd QB though, so obviously he wasn't seeing the amount of snaps Prescott is. Plus he wasn't even with a team the previous year, and had to learn his 4th offense in 4 seasons. So I'm not sure Tebow had a huge advantage with his situation.
Either way, my point is that we should probably take preseason stats with some grain of salt.
Oh, most certainly. You're right that preseason doesn't really mean much.
Hard to really compare backup QBs without it, though, until a starter goes down and they get a chance.
____________________________________________________________
Posts: 3,160
Threads: 70
Reputation:
15749
Joined: May 2015
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
(08-20-2016, 04:30 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: Either way, my point is that we should probably take preseason stats with some grain of salt.
Agreed.
Remember when Teddy was having an amazing preseason last year and everyone thought he was going to do amazing?
Dude went 29 for 35 all of preseaon and was throwing bombs and darts everywhere. Only to have 14 TDs all of the regular season and struggle with down the field throws.
Posts: 15,116
Threads: 221
Reputation:
147378
Joined: May 2015
(08-20-2016, 04:42 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Oh, most certainly. You're right that preseason doesn't really mean much.
Hard to really compare backup QBs without it, though, until a starter goes down and they get a chance.
True true. It beats a blank if you're trying to make a comparison.
(08-20-2016, 05:16 PM)wolfkaosaun Wrote: Agreed.
Remember when Teddy was having an amazing preseason last year and everyone thought he was going to do amazing?
Dude went 29 for 35 all of preseaon and was throwing bombs and darts everywhere. Only to have 14 TDs all of the regular season and struggle with down the field throws.
Teddy might just be the most overrated QB in the league. Talk about a game manager. The kid hardly ever went downfield. Dink and dunk city...when he wasn't handing off to AP and getting out of the way. I've seen Vikings fans argue that Teddy > Carr. I think that's being borderline delusional.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
|