(10-21-2016, 01:58 PM)Murdock2420 Wrote: *Golf clap*

Good job.....on failing at reading comprehension.

The fine as was stated above, was for stepping on Blount, meaning the NFL looked at the hit on Bennett and agreed, there was no foul. Let that sink in...and then read what you wrote again.

Oh, sure, because the NFL system of fines is fool-proof and always makes sense.

But both were dirty plays.  And Burfict has been fined $805,000 in just 53 games.  Let that sink in and then read why you're defending him again.

(10-21-2016, 03:41 PM)JustWinBaby Wrote: Oh, sure, because the NFL system of fines is fool-proof and always makes sense.

But both were dirty plays.  And Burfict has been fined $805,000 in just 53 games.  Let that sink in and then read why you're defending him again.

I'm defending him for the simple reason of if he was wearing yellow and black, he'd have half as many fines and would be labeled "A throwback/physical player" The hate for him, is because he is giving it back to teams, that don't know how to deal with it. 

(10-21-2016, 03:41 PM)JustWinBaby Wrote: Oh, sure, because the NFL system of fines is fool-proof and always makes sense.

But both were dirty plays.  And Burfict has been fined $805,000 in just 53 games.  Let that sink in and then read why you're defending him again.

Wrong again. One wasn't dirty and the other didn't happen. 

I'm still waiting to see a video of him actually stepping on anyone. But proof of a crime not committed is usually kind of hard to find.

(10-21-2016, 04:12 PM)Murdock2420 Wrote: I'm defending him for the simple reason of if he was wearing yellow and black, he'd have half as many fines

No....he's dirty, not a "tough" or "hardnosed" football player.  There's a difference that you wouldn't understand because the Bungals have always sucked, and also generally been soft.

You see a dumbass hit a guy low and you think that's just physical football.  You've never seen better to know the difference. 

Nothing to do with the colors he wears....just the color of your glasses.

(10-21-2016, 07:48 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: Wrong again. One wasn't dirty and the other didn't happen. 

LMFAO....it's between him and Suh for dirtiest player in the league and no one else is even close.

Gawd, you guys are pathetic.  Most Steeler fans hate and ***** about Mike Mitchell for being half as dirty as Buttfuct.  But then we're used to having players who actually are good, and legit physical and not cheap shot pretenders.  Of course, we actually know the difference and don't embarass ourselves smacktalking about some wannabe who makes fans wet themselves when he hits someone 3 steps late.

Burfict on his best day is 10X worse than Hines Ward....and I'm sure if we rewind the tape you thought Ward was the devil.  One of those guys is headed to the HOF, while the other is giving almost all his paycheck to charity.

(10-22-2016, 06:05 AM)JustWinBaby Wrote: No....he's dirty, not a "tough" or "hardnosed" football player.  There's a difference that you wouldn't understand because the Bungals have always sucked, and also generally been soft.

You see a dumbass hit a guy low and you think that's just physical football.  You've never seen better to know the difference. 

Nothing to do with the colors he wears....just the color of your glasses.

The Standard (Steelers fan) is (in fact) the Standard (Steelers fan).

You guys would be chest thumping and messing up your black and yellow underoos if you had Burfict on the Steelers playing "stiller footbaww".

(10-22-2016, 06:13 AM)JustWinBaby Wrote: LMFAO....it's between him and Suh for dirtiest player in the league and no one else is even close.

Gawd, you guys are pathetic.  Most Steeler fans hate and ***** about Mike Mitchell for being half as dirty as Buttfuct.  But then we're used to having players who actually are good, and legit physical and not cheap shot pretenders.  Of course, we actually know the difference and don't embarass ourselves smacktalking about some wannabe who makes fans wet themselves when he hits someone 3 steps late.

Burfict on his best day is 10X worse than Hines Ward....and I'm sure if we rewind the tape you thought Ward was the devil.  One of those guys is headed to the HOF, while the other is giving almost all his paycheck to charity.

Wrong once again. Mitchell is way more dirty than Burfict. Hines Ward was voted the dirtiest player in the NFL by his peers.
http://www.si.com/nfl/2009/11/04/dirty

There's a long list of dirty players that have played for the Steelers over the last 4+ decades. 

You're a blind, biased Steeler honk. Shove off with your prattling ways. 

What's most amusing about Burfict an now the whining about Suh is that it illustrates perfectly just what little "we can dish it out but not take it" bitches steeler fans are.

(10-22-2016, 11:58 AM)Beaker Wrote: What's most amusing about Burfict an now the whining about Suh is that it illustrates perfectly just what little "we can dish it out but not take it" bitches steeler fans are.

Bengals fans still aren't over Hines Ward.

(10-22-2016, 03:26 PM)6andcounting Wrote: Bengals fans still aren't over Hines Ward.

Give it 10 years and you'll still hear steeler fans crying about suh and Burfict too. You know how they love to live in the past.

(10-22-2016, 03:26 PM)6andcounting Wrote: Bengals fans still aren't over Hines Ward.

Who? Oh, that average WR that played 50 years. Yeah, he was a decent blocker. Whoopdeedoo. 

(10-22-2016, 08:18 AM)StoneTheCrow Wrote: You guys would be chest thumping and messing up your black and yellow underoos if you had Burfict on the Steelers playing "stiller footbaww".

No, because Burfuct actually IS dirty and only a good, but not great, player.  Again, you guys don't know good football, or good players, when you see them...because you've never seen them.

(10-22-2016, 11:22 AM)rfaulk34 Wrote: Wrong once again. Mitchell is way more dirty than Burfict. Hines Ward was voted the dirtiest player in the NFL by his peers.
http://www.si.com/nfl/2009/11/04/dirty

Ok....want to show me the numbers on fines?

Of course not, because you're on crack.  Burfuct is a dirty skank.  And you know it.  But you choose to love him because all your players suck.

(10-22-2016, 11:22 PM)Beaker Wrote: Give it 10 years and you'll still hear steeler fans crying about suh and Burfict too. You know how they love to live in the past.

I don't really hear anyone whining now, and not sure why anyone would. 

We're just telling you Burfuct is dirty.  And he is, and the whole league knows he is, but create whatever reality you want.  He's pretty much the worst hood ever to run between the hashes.

(10-23-2016, 05:05 AM)JustWinBaby Wrote:  but create whatever reality you want.  He's pretty much the worst hood ever to run between the hashes.

Irony...and crying

(10-23-2016, 05:05 AM)JustWinBaby Wrote: I don't really hear anyone whining now, and not sure why anyone would. 

We're just telling you Burfuct is dirty.  And he is, and the whole league knows he is, but create whatever reality you want.  He's pretty much the worst hood ever to run between the hashes.

(10-22-2016, 06:05 AM)JustWinBaby Wrote: No....he's dirty, not a "tough" or "hardnosed" football player.  There's a difference that you wouldn't understand because the Bungals have always sucked, and also generally been soft.

You see a dumbass hit a guy low and you think that's just physical football.  You've never seen better to know the difference. 

Nothing to do with the colors he wears....just the color of your glasses.

The amount of stupid in your post doesn't even warrant an actual real response...

So I shall give you this instead: