https://www.google.com/amp/www.cincyjungle.com/platform/amp/2017/2/28/14755214/player-for-player-aj-mccarron-trade-idea

I for one would not oppose to this.... He seemed to take a big step forward this year before his injury....

Not bad, but it won't happen if Shannahan and Cousins are determined to reunite.

[quote pid='349634' dateline='1488337313']
Not bad, but it won't happen if Shannahan and Cousins are determined to reunite.
[/quote]

Well cousins got tagged so at least 1 year 

[quote pid='349634' dateline='1488337313']
Not bad, but it won't happen if Shannahan and Cousins are determined to reunite.
[/quote]

Cousins was tagged, so he's not going anywhere this season.

I would rather have an early draft pick.

They assigned the exclusive rights tag on cousins. They can trade him, but teams can only negotiate with the team, not his agents.

As much as I think the Bengals need to trade him, there has to be interest from another team as well. With Jimmy G being the first choice it seems plus 3 guys expected to go round 1 in the draft, have to see who is left wanting later on.

(03-01-2017, 01:15 AM)BenZoo2 Wrote: They assigned the exclusive rights tag on cousins. They can trade him, but teams can only negotiate with the team, not his agents.

Reports are they want a rgiii type haul....

(03-01-2017, 01:16 AM)Murdock2420 Wrote: As much as I think the Bengals need to trade him, there has to be interest from another team as well. With Jimmy G being the first choice it seems plus 3 guys expected to go round 1 in the draft, have to see who is left wanting later on.

Yeah the qbs that will be taken are reaches. It depends on what u think of mccarron. Personally i would take him over
Any qb in this class. Nobody is good enough.

I don't know much about Armstead, but I think I'd rather keep McCarron. Unless our Oline drastically improves after probably losing Z and maybe even Whit, we might want to consider carrying 3 QBS on the 53 and 1 or 2 on the PS.

Just sayin...

(03-01-2017, 03:24 AM)Shady Wrote: I don't know much about Armstead, but I think I'd rather keep McCarron. Unless our Oline drastically improves after probably losing Z and maybe even Whit, we might want to consider carrying 3 QBS on the 53 and 1 or 2 on the PS.

Just sayin...

well we already carried 3 last year on the 53. I peraonally think we really like driskell..... But if we dont i would love to get a pat mahomes in the 4th or a chad kelly in the 5th

(03-01-2017, 04:29 AM)Jpoore Wrote: well we already carried 3 last year on the 53. I peraonally think we really like driskell..... But if we dont i would love to get a pat mahomes in the 4th or a chad kelly in the 5th

Mahomes will be long gone before the 4th round.

Armstead hasn't really did much...2 sacks 1 year, 2.5 another year.

He does have the height/weight that the Bengals like at DE.

(03-01-2017, 01:16 AM)Murdock2420 Wrote: As much as I think the Bengals need to trade him, there has to be interest from another team as well. With Jimmy G being the first choice it seems plus 3 guys expected to go round 1 in the draft, have to see who is left wanting later on.

This is why I think its a day 2 draft move....

Some team wont get what they want and will still be looking for a QB