(04-15-2017, 12:48 AM)Whatever Wrote: San Francisco offers Cincinnati the #2 overall pick for QB AJ McCarron and the #9 overall pick.

(04-15-2017, 08:56 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Seems reasonable. AJ is most likely as talented as any QB coming out this year and SF can still get a high end player at 9.

I was looking to work something with the Jets. Perhaps AJ and a 2nd for their 1st.

AJ McCarron has a high calling here.

I'll have to think about them both. Granted, if Cleveland wants to trade their #1, that's something I'll pay most attention to.

(04-15-2017, 11:02 PM)seahawkscheat Wrote: seems reasonable and realistic but why not just trade him to the browns for the #1 pick

I don't think the Browns would be interested in this in real life, and especially not on this mock. Cleveland is staying put and addressing a need at 1, at least during this mock. 

(04-17-2017, 10:29 AM)dr1441 Wrote: I don't think the Browns would be interested in this in real life, and especially not on this mock. Cleveland is staying put and addressing a need at 1, at least during this mock. 

Ah, the voice of reason. [emoji1303]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So we have one confirmed trade and 2 on the table:

Confirmed: Titans trade the #18 overall pick to Carolina for their #40, #64, #98

Proposed: 49ERS offer #2 overall pick to Cincinnati for AJ McCarron and the #9 overall pick (needs Bengals OK and commish approval)
TEXANS offer #25 overall to Cincinnati for AJ McCarron and the #41 overall pick ( needs Bengals OK and commish approval)
NYJ rescind their earlier offer.

(04-17-2017, 10:31 AM)BenZoo2 Wrote: Ah, the voice of reason.  [emoji1303]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I suppose it is what you consider reasonable. The top prospect in this draft is a DE with character concerns. This is at a position where they recently spent to #32 on Ogbah and just paid Jamie Collins handsomely. With this move they could kill 2 birds. Solve QB and still get a high caliber player with the #9.

(04-17-2017, 12:50 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I suppose it is what you consider reasonable. The top prospect in this draft is a DE with character concerns. This is at a position where they recently spent to #32 on Ogbah and just paid Jamie Collins handsomely. With this move they could kill 2 birds. Solve QB and still get a high caliber player with the #9.

I just don't think aj and 9 offered to Cleveland for 1 would be accepted in real life imho. I'm waiting on wolf to accept or counter before approving.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(04-17-2017, 12:59 PM)BenZoo2 Wrote: I just don't think aj and 9 offered to Cleveland for 1 would be accepted in real life imho.  I'm waiting on wolf to accept or counter before approving.  


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

And if you would have asked me about 6 weeks ago I wouldn't have thought they would take on Osweiller.

(04-17-2017, 01:08 PM)bfine32 Wrote: And if you would have asked me about 6 weeks ago I wouldn't have thought they would take on Osweiller.

I wouldn't have either. It was an unprecedented move. Essentially buying houstons second rounder next year. For a team with the cap space and the holes they have I think it was a good move for them


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(04-17-2017, 12:34 PM)bfine32 Wrote: So we have one confirmed trade and 2 on the table:

Confirmed: Titans trade the #18 overall pick to Carolina for their #40, #64, #98

Proposed: 49ERS offer #2 overall pick to Cincinnati for AJ McCarron and the #9 overall pick (needs Bengals OK and commish approval)
               TEXANS offer #25 overall to Cincinnati for AJ McCarron and the #41 overall pick ( needs Bengals OK and commish approval)
                NYJ rescind their earlier offer.

Ravens got hosed they offered the #16 pick to carolina and were turned down (plus there trade offer was put in first) I guess only some teams are allowed to make trades

(04-17-2017, 01:47 PM)seahawkscheat Wrote: Ravens got hosed they offered the #16 pick to carolina and were turned down (plus there trade offer was put in first) I guess only some teams are allowed to make trades

I believe this was already settled between you and holic. There was nothing accepted, therefore nothing to approve. Seriously.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(04-17-2017, 02:00 PM)BenZoo2 Wrote: I believe this was already settled between you and holic.  There was nothing accepted, therefore nothing to approve.  Seriously.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk okay just seems ridiculous that the #16 pick for the same draft picks does not get approved but the #18 pick is plus like stated my offer was put in first

Show me where your trade offer was accepted.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(04-17-2017, 02:12 PM)BenZoo2 Wrote: Show me where your trade offer was accepted.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

it was rejected which doesn't make sense since it would benefit carolina slightly more than now

(04-17-2017, 02:14 PM)seahawkscheat Wrote: it was rejected which doesn't make sense since it would benefit carolina slightly more than now

I believe it was rejected because the points weren't close enough. At least that's what you indicated to me. The matter is closed.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(04-17-2017, 01:47 PM)seahawkscheat Wrote: Ravens got hosed they offered the #16 pick to carolina and were turned down (plus there trade offer was put in first) I guess only some teams are allowed to make trades

It's like I told you in the PM's...I just chose the offer that I thought had a better chance of getting approved, which was at 18, because the point values were almost identical. 

It was nothing personal brother. Remember, this is all just for fun.  :andy:

(04-16-2017, 11:27 PM)wolfkaosaun Wrote: AJ McCarron has a high calling here.

I'll have to think about them both. Granted, if Cleveland wants to trade their #1, that's something I'll pay most attention to.

How about the following 3 team trade?

Bengals Get

#2-9'ers
#6-Jets

Jets Get
AJ McCarron-Bengals
#66-9'ers
#109-9'ers
#146-9'ers

49'ers Get
#9-Bengals
#39-Jets
#41-Bengals
Sheldon Richardson-Jets

(04-17-2017, 12:50 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I suppose it is what you consider reasonable. The top prospect in this draft is a DE with character concerns. This is at a position where they recently spent to #32 on Ogbah and just paid Jamie Collins handsomely. With this move they could kill 2 birds. Solve QB and still get a high caliber player with the #9.

That is certainly one way to look at it but the other is, why would they trade back nine spots and only pick up a backup QB that has less than a handful of starts under his belt? I'm not sure its as much of the voice of reason as it is difference in opinion and skill of AJ Mccarron. I think he is a good QB, a great backup and insurance, but I don't think he has more physical talent than probably the top 3-4 QB's in this draft class. 

(04-17-2017, 04:19 PM)dr1441 Wrote: That is certainly one way to look at it but the other is, why would they trade back nine spots and only pick up a backup QB that has less than a handful of starts under his belt? I'm not sure its as much of the voice of reason as it is difference in opinion and skill of AJ Mccarron. I think he is a good QB, a great backup and insurance, but I don't think he has more physical talent than probably the top 3-4 QB's in this draft class. 

Yep, it's a matter of opinion. Cleveland could probably still get the #1 QB on the board at 9 or 12 to groom behind AJ for a year or 2.

(04-17-2017, 02:51 PM)Whatever Wrote: How about the following 3 team trade?

Bengals Get

#2-9'ers
#6-Jets

Jets Get
AJ McCarron-Bengals
#66-9'ers
#109-9'ers
#146-9'ers

49'ers Get
#9-Bengals
#39-Jets
#41-Bengals
Sheldon Richardson-Jets

If trying to figure it out makes my head hurt, I'm opposed to it.

(04-17-2017, 06:50 PM)bfine32 Wrote: If trying to figure it out makes my head hurt, I'm opposed to it.

Lol, no problem.