How long before the Browns trade Gordon to the Steelers for Landry Jones?

From watching his actions on the field, TJ Watt seems to be a real dick.....

(12-31-2017, 05:19 PM)Sled21 Wrote: From watching his actions on the field, TJ Watt seems to be a real dick.....

He sure celebrates a lot of average plays.

(12-31-2017, 05:07 PM)michaelsean Wrote: How long before the Browns trade Gordon to the Steelers for Landry Jones?

The trade is not for the Browns to get a QB.  It is for Bell and Bryant to get a new source...

Pouncey may want to run and suit up

Only the Browns LOL.

Hoping they look at that interception good. Hoping for an incomplete.

Come on Cleveland. Get your 1st victory against Pittsburgh.

Come on Browns!

(12-31-2017, 05:54 PM)HarleyDog Wrote: Come on Cleveland. Get your 1st victory against Pittsburgh.

Would it really be a victory?

Coming from behind against the backup line, RB, WRs, and QB?

There were some angry people around here because we didn't get Coleman.

I have to say they should instead feel relieved.

(12-31-2017, 05:56 PM)jfkbengals Wrote: Would it really be a victory?

Coming from behind against the backup line, RB, WRs, and QB?

WRs are the starters and QB and RB not your typical backups.

Good lord.

I know Cleveland is bad. But unable to beat a B-Team bad? That's embarrassing.

They said Hue was safe, but keeping a coach after an 0-16 season? That might even go beyond Bengals FO loyalty.

(12-31-2017, 10:50 AM)treee Wrote: Browns first win in over 2 years today.

Or not.

(12-31-2017, 06:02 PM)cinci4life Wrote: WRs are the starters and QB and RB not your typical backups.

#2 and #3 receivers.  I'll give you that they can be considered starters.

Jones is not very good, so I'm not sure what you mean there, and Ridley just joined the team as a backup.

No starting C or G either.

Had the Browns won, it's not like there was something there for them to hang their hat on.  It would just be an asterisk on the record.

(12-31-2017, 06:04 PM)CKwi88 Wrote: Good lord.

I know Cleveland is bad. But unable to beat a B-Team bad? That's embarrassing.

They said Hue was safe, but keeping a coach after an 0-16 season? That might even go beyond Bengals FO loyalty.

Especially when the overall record is 1-31.

Get the parade ready

(12-31-2017, 06:08 PM)jfkbengals Wrote: #2 and #3 receivers.  I'll give you that they can be considered starters.

Jones is not very good, so I'm not sure what you mean there, and Ridley just joined the team as a backup.

No starting C or G either.

Had the Browns won, it's not like there was something there for them to hang their hat on.  It would just be an asterisk on the record.

Ridley was the starter for the Pats a couple years ago and Jones played a good chunk of a season 2 or 3 years ago when Ben was hurt and out for a lengthy period. They both have more experience than you give them credit for. Now the line I can agree with you.

I don't know how they keep Hue Jackson. I really don't.

(12-31-2017, 06:18 PM)Big Boss Wrote: I don't know how they keep Hue Jackson.  I really don't.

The only reason they can consider it is the stupid Moneyball crap they did.

Jackson lobbied to draft Watson, they didn't.  They see what Wentz has done.  I'm sure he had plenty of conversations with the owner that they can't do any better because they kept failing to appropriately utilize the picks they had, as well as jettisoning what little talent was there.

IF he is retained, that is the only reason why...