(03-03-2018, 12:34 PM)Stewy Wrote:

That was like a physics experiment gone way wrong.

James came in at 6’2” 215lbs. That should be good for his 40 time. I’ve seen him do a 41” vertical, he should be able to do 20+ reps of 225. The 3 cone will be interesting since one of his knocks is he can be a bit stiff.

56% not withstanding, Josh Allen is the best of these QB's. He'll be way better in the NFL than he was in college. Might take a year to really blossom. I truly hope the Browns don't agree.

TE out of PSU is having a good combine.

(03-03-2018, 12:54 PM)McC Wrote: 56% not withstanding, Josh Allen is the best of these QB's.  He'll be way better in the NFL than he was in college.  Might take a year to really blossom.  I truly hope the Browns don't agree.

Just finished texting with a buddy of mine that is a huge Browns supporter. He seems to think Darnold at #1 & trade back at #4. We'll see, but he usually knows his stuff?

(03-03-2018, 03:46 PM)bfine32 Wrote: TE out of PSU is having a good combine.

He's good, & underated as a blocker. I know that you already knew that though.

I really want our #1 wr replacement in equanimous St brown. He's destroyed the combine.

(03-03-2018, 12:17 PM)McC Wrote: He's the best player in the draft and he will never make it to 4.  We'll be chasing this guy for the next eight to ten years.

Especially with NYG and IND at 2 and 3. They both could use an elite RB. Gotta take Barkley at 1 if you like him.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(03-03-2018, 03:57 PM)coachmcneil71 Wrote: He's good, & underated as a blocker. I know that you already knew that though.

Compare his measureables to Eiferts

Gesicki: 247 lbs, 6'5", 34.0" Arms, 10.175" Hands
40- 4:54, Vert- 41.5", Broad-129.0, Reps- 22


Eifert: 250 lbs, 6'5", 33.185" Arms, 9.175" Hands
40- 4.68, Vert- 35.5, Broad- 119.0, Reps- 22

(03-03-2018, 05:40 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Compare his measureables to Eiferts

Gesicki: 247 lbs, 6'5", 34.0" Arms, 10.175" Hands
40- 4:54, Vert- 41.5", Broad-129.0, Reps- 22


Eifert: 250 lbs, 6'5", 33.185" Arms, 9.175" Hands
40- 4.68, Vert- 35.5, Broad- 119.0, Reps- 22

Wow! I knew that they were similar, but I didn't realize the numbers are that close.

(03-03-2018, 06:41 PM)coachmcneil71 Wrote: Wow! I knew that they were similar, but I didn't realize the numbers are that close.

Yes, but vertical and speed huge advantage to Eifert

(03-03-2018, 07:39 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: Yes, but vertical and speed huge advantage to Eifert

Are you saying Eifert had a better vert and 40? If so, you have it backwards, I think Vernon Davis was the only TE that has had a better vert. 

(03-03-2018, 05:40 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Compare his measureables to Eiferts

Gesicki: 247 lbs, 6'5", 34.0" Arms, 10.175" Hands
40- 4:54, Vert- 41.5", Broad-129.0, Reps- 22


Eifert: 250 lbs, 6'5", 33.185" Arms, 9.175" Hands
40- 4.68, Vert- 35.5, Broad- 119.0, Reps- 22

Gesicki just jumped to the top of the TE class...literally.

(03-03-2018, 03:57 PM)coachmcneil71 Wrote: Just finished texting with a buddy of mine that is a huge Browns supporter. He seems to think Darnold at #1 & trade back at #4. We'll see, but he usually knows his stuff?

He's good, & underated as a blocker. I know that you already knew that though.

I hope like hell the Browns do that.  Only the Browns could find a way to screw up that setup.

Edmunds with 19 on the bench press. Add that in with his measurements he's not gonna be there when we pick imo. Lve did 20

(03-03-2018, 04:06 PM)Jpoore Wrote: I really want our #1 wr replacement in equanimous St brown. He's destroyed the combine.

I could have swore just a month or two ago cortland Sutton had you highest grade on a wr since aj/ Julio draft.

You really should stop posting in this, or any other forum, on this site. You make yourself look like a laughing stock.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(03-04-2018, 12:22 AM)BenZoo2 Wrote: I could have swore just a month or two ago cortland Sutton had you highest grade on a wr since aj/ Julio draft.

You really should stop posting in this, or any other forum, on this site.  You make yourself look like a laughing stock.  


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm on Sutton. But we aren't going wr round 1. Possibly round 2. We just have so many needs idk what direction we go. And due respect,  idrc what u think bc I have a 85 percent hit rate since 2011 and been scouting since I was 13, not to mention went to scouting school multiple times. What have u done exactly?

Here's the video of the billy price injury for those who missed it.
https://twitter.com/MySportsUpdate/status/969575354477268993?s=19

(03-03-2018, 09:57 PM)McC Wrote: I hope like hell the Browns do that.  Only the Browns could find a way to screw up that setup.

After watching what the Bucks D did to him in the bowl game, I pretty much agree. I like his tenacity though. 

(03-04-2018, 03:10 AM)Jpoore Wrote: I'm on Sutton. But we aren't going wr round 1. Possibly round 2. We just have so many needs idk what direction we go. And due respect,  idrc what u think bc I have a 85 percent hit rate since 2011 and been scouting since I was 13, not to mention went to scouting school multiple times. What have u done exactly?

Prove your 85% hit rate.  What are your metrics?  Define your hits and misses.  If you have a 85% hit rate than you're a bigger fool than I thought because you should be making millions as the best gm/talent evaluator in football.

And while I haven't gone to the acme school of scouting multiple times or "scouted since I was 13" I have watched you make bombastic, over the top comments about players only to watch you flip flop with even more bombastic, over the top comments about another player at the same position

Vita Vea with 5.11 40 time. Still good for his size, but definitely not 4.9 like some on here were predicting.

Edit - Vea done with drills for the day, suffered a hamstring injury. Not sure how early into the run it happened to affect his time.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk