(05-03-2019, 04:49 PM)Captain Obvious Wrote: You're talking about the Bengals stinking so bad, but yet the Browns haven't won the division since 1989. Heck the last time they won the division, there was no AFC North. At least have a winning season before you start telling other teams they stink or that your team is going to rule the division. 

That was the Ravens my dude. The Browns have never won shit. That's why they throw a parade for a losing season that resulted in a 3rd place finish.

(05-04-2019, 06:31 PM)BFritz21 Wrote: Actually, that is factually way off as you have no idea if the parts of my brain that control memory were damaged or how much it affects me in that aspect.

You're either making things up and pretending to know to fit your agenda or flat-out lying, but either way you're wrong.

Once again, I'd be happy to go back through the incidents and you can tell me which ones you think I'm wrong about, but I remember them all correctly.

You might have an argument if I hadn't brought it all up again and again since right after it happened, but I've continued since they all happened and my statements of facts hasn't changed at all, unlike other members on here.

Do you realize that you recounted two things about my post incorrectly even just moments after reading it?  

First, I never commented on the specifics of your brain.  I simply said that a person doesn't need brain damage to remember something incorrectly.  My point was that we are all susceptible to getting something wrong.  Healthy brains do it all the time.  And you certainly did exactly that in your comment about me.  You seem convinced here that I made a comment about your brain when I did no such thing.  Read it again and I think you'll find that this is true.  


Second, I never said that you were wrong.  I basically said that you cannot conceive of even the slightest possibility that you might be.  Not the same thing.  And yet you respond to me as if I definitively accused you of being wrong.  I wouldn't do such a thing without proof, which I don't have because the posts that prove it were made on the old site.  But I can prove that you are making things up about me, because my post (which still exists) never accused you of being wrong.  Read it again and I think you'll find that this is true.  

You got two things very wrong about my post because you made preconceived assumptions about what I would say and how I think.  And you were convinced that you were right about those things, even though a review of my post would show that you are imagining them.  Given this, and given your history of doing this sort of thing many times with me, I think it is highly likely that you are remembering your conversation with Pat incorrectly.  I wouldn't stake my life on it, because - again - I don't have proof.  But you're not doing yourself any favors by imagining points that I never made in my posts (which, again, still exist for everyone to re-read).  

(05-04-2019, 11:15 PM)JS-Steelerfan Wrote: Do you realize that you recounted two things about my post incorrectly even just moments after reading it?  

First, I never commented on the specifics of your brain.  I simply said that a person doesn't need brain damage to remember something incorrectly.  My point was that we are all susceptible to getting something wrong.  Healthy brains do it all the time.  And you certainly did exactly that in your comment about me.  You seem convinced here that I made a comment about your brain when I did no such thing.  Read it again and I think you'll find that this is true.  

There would have been no reason to even bring it up.  Also, claiming that I have an inability to distinguish between facts and opinions would also lean more towards arguing that that's the case because you think my brain injury causes it.

My points never changed, and I'll be happy to point them out to you if you'd like and you can see.  

(05-04-2019, 11:15 PM)JS-Steelerfan Wrote: Second, I never said that you were wrong.  I basically said that you cannot conceive of even the slightest possibility that you might be.  Not the same thing.  And yet you respond to me as if I definitively accused you of being wrong.  I wouldn't do such a thing without proof, which I don't have because the posts that prove it were made on the old site.  But I can prove that you are making things up about me, because my post (which still exists) never accused you of being wrong.  Read it again and I think you'll find that this is true.  

If you didn't think I was wrong, then there would be no point to even post that in this thread.

We were discussing the issue, so either you are trying to just change the subject entirely or you were saying that I was wrong.

(05-04-2019, 11:15 PM)JS-Steelerfan Wrote: You got two things very wrong about my post because you made preconceived assumptions about what I would say and how I think.  And you were convinced that you were right about those things, even though a review of my post would show that you are imagining them.  Given this, and given your history of doing this sort of thing many times with me, I think it is highly likely that you are remembering your conversation with Pat incorrectly.  I wouldn't stake my life on it, because - again - I don't have proof.  But you're not doing yourself any favors by imagining points that I never made in my posts (which, again, still exist for everyone to re-read).  

I didn't get those things wrong about you, as I pointed out above, and I'd be happy to go through the Pat situation and prove how I'm not remembering them wrong.

(05-04-2019, 11:36 PM)BFritz21 Wrote: There would have been no reason to even bring it up.  Also, claiming that I have an inability to distinguish between facts and opinions would also lean more towards arguing that that's the case because you think my brain injury causes it.

My points never changed, and I'll be happy to point them out to you if you'd like and you can see.  


If you didn't think I was wrong, then there would be no point to even post that in this thread.

We were discussing the issue, so either you are trying to just change the subject entirely or you were saying that I was wrong.


I didn't get those things wrong about you, as I pointed out above, and I'd be happy to go through the Pat situation and prove how I'm not remembering them wrong.

Bottom line: you put words in my mouth that I didn't say and when that's pointed out, you double down.

Arguing with you is an exercise in futility because you consider your own certainty to be all the proof you need.

By the way, you made some more incorrect assumptions in this post too, but there's no sense in addressing them, since you would only deny them, assuming that you know my own mind better than I do.

(05-05-2019, 08:23 AM)JS-Steelerfan Wrote: Bottom line: you put words in my mouth that I didn't say and when that's pointed out, you double down.

Arguing with you is an exercise in futility because you consider your own certainty to be all the proof you need.

By the way, you made some more incorrect assumptions in this post too, but there's no sense in addressing them, since you would only deny them, assuming that you know my own mind better than I do.

Last paragraph reminds me of my ex wife... Brutal.

(05-04-2019, 06:49 PM)jason Wrote: That's why they throw a parade for a losing season that resulted in a 3rd place finish.

And the browns threw an actual parade around their stadium 2 yrs ago for finishing 0-16.

(05-05-2019, 08:23 AM)JS-Steelerfan Wrote: Bottom line: you put words in my mouth that I didn't say and when that's pointed out, you double down.  

Arguing with you is an exercise in futility because you consider your own certainty to be all the proof you need.

By the way, you made some more incorrect assumptions in this post too, but there's no sense in addressing them, since you would only deny  them, assuming that you know my own mind better than I do.

I don't put words in your mouth, I just point out things that you say without saying them.

There would be no reason to post the things you do if they didn't have meaning.

You're the one doubling down and just resorting to insults instead of having a real conversation, which is typical of you.

If I was incorrect, a civil adult would address those points and we'd discuss them, but you just resort to insults and then accuse me of doing similar things.

(05-05-2019, 09:28 AM)Beaker Wrote: And the browns threw an actual parade around their stadium 2 yrs ago for finishing 0-16.

Hey... It's hard to lose every game.

(05-04-2019, 06:49 PM)jason Wrote: That was the Ravens my dude. The Browns have never won shit. That's why they throw a parade for a losing season that resulted in a 3rd place finish.

Oh yeah, you're right. The new Browns haven't won crap in their existence. I just have to laugh at how a team that finished third in the division can think the next season they'll be world beaters.

(05-05-2019, 09:49 AM)BFritz21 Wrote: I don't put words in your mouth, I just point out things that you say without saying them.

Dude, that’s the very definition of putting words in a person’s mouth. And you wonder why you have trouble getting into civil conversations ...

(05-05-2019, 06:52 PM)JS-Steelerfan Wrote: Dude, that’s the very definition of putting words in a person’s mouth.  And you wonder why you have trouble getting into civil conversations ...

Putting words in your mouth would be if I was just making things up out of nowhere.

(05-05-2019, 12:30 PM)jason Wrote: Hey... It's hard to lose every game.

Whats it matter? The Bengals won as many playoff games in the last thirty years as the Browns. That is all about to change and all you Bungaloid homers know it.

(05-05-2019, 12:30 PM)jason Wrote: Hey... It's hard to lose every game.

Hi. Here is a pic of another Bungal women beater that you can use in your sig if you get tired of the women face puncher you have as your sig now.
Your welcome.  

(05-06-2019, 12:24 AM)BFritz21 Wrote: Putting words in your mouth would be if I was just making things up out of nowhere.

Putting words in my mouth is also you assuming that you know better than me what my intentions are. You don't. You've built up an image of me in your head that isn't factual, yet you trust it implicitly.

(05-06-2019, 07:23 AM)JS-Steelerfan Wrote: Putting words in my mouth is also you assuming that you know better than me what my intentions are.  You don't.  You've built up an image of me in your head that isn't factual, yet you trust it implicitly.

It's hilarious how you've bashed me to no end in the past and then say "it's all built up in your head!"

Steelers fans 

Just like when Ben has his bodyguards force a college girl in a bathroom and then rapes her, "it's all built up in her head!"

(05-06-2019, 01:49 PM)BFritz21 Wrote: It's hilarious how you've bashed me to no end in the past and then say "it's all built up in your head!"

Steelers fans 

Just like when Ben has his bodyguards force a college girl in a bathroom and then rapes her, "it's all built up in her head!"

You have no idea how much of it really is in your head. A good chunk of what you think I bash you for is just like this conversation: you responding to something you read into my comments without me ever having said it.

You assume that because I’m a ‘typical Steeler fan’ that you already know what I’m going to say. And because you’re so confident in that assumption, you often read my comments assuming I’ve already said it and pay little attention to what I actually say. Many of your replies to me contain at least one response to a point I haven’t made.

(05-06-2019, 06:14 AM)BakertheBeast Wrote: Whats it matter? The Bengals won as many playoff games in the last thirty years as the Browns. That is all about to change and all you Bungaloid homers know it.

Except the Ravens won that last playoff game for Cleveland. So you're wrong... As usual.

(05-06-2019, 02:35 PM)JS-Steelerfan Wrote: You have no idea how much of it really is in your head.  A good chunk of what you think I bash you for is just like this conversation: you responding to something you read into my comments without me ever having said it.  

You assume that because I’m a ‘typical Steeler fan’ that you already know what I’m going to say.  And because you’re so confident in that assumption, you often read my comments assuming I’ve already said it and pay little attention to what I actually say. Many of your replies to me contain at least one response to a point I haven’t made.

Because you always accuse me of things without really saying anything and all of your Steelers friends back you and then you all think you're the smartest people alive, even though you really didn't say anything, and especially nothing with any substance.

Mixon's old mentor and fellow woman beater turned Bengals player Pacman "Was Somehow Made a Captain on the Bengals after Slugging a Woman" Jones was arrested for cheating in a casino.

https://www.tmz.com/2019/05/05/pacman-jones-arrest-video-gambling-casino/

(05-06-2019, 11:56 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: Mixon's old mentor and fellow woman beater turned Bengals player Pacman "Was Somehow Made a Captain on the Bengals after Slugging a Woman" Jones was arrested for cheating in a casino.

https://www.tmz.com/2019/05/05/pacman-jones-arrest-video-gambling-casino/

That happened months ago, and since Jones wasn't a member of the Bengals, it makes it even more of a lame attempt at smack talk.

I also love how you continue to call Mixon a woman beater for something that happened when he was in college that he was brought to tears in shame but have no problem with your team's franchise icon being a murderer and also defended your team keeping a woman beater because "there was no evidence that Rice knocked her out" without the full tape even though even you couldn't offer any other explanation for how she possibly could have suddenly become unconscious if Rice hadn't knocked her out.