(10-23-2019, 07:30 PM)Crazyjdawg Wrote: eh. He's not wrong. I don't think this team is 0-7 bad. Just anti-clutch in very specific scenarios. We could easily be 4-3 with a few clutch moments.

Obviously squeaking out wins is not ideal, but we aren't being blown out in most of these games.

I don't see what being a millennial has to do with it.

In Dave Shula's 1st year...the team had 5 wins and also lost 5 games by 7 points or less.

That could have been a 10 win team IF they were clutch.

(10-24-2019, 12:53 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: In Dave Shula's 1st year...the team had 5 wins and also lost 5 games by 7 points or less.

That could have been a 10 win team IF they were clutch.

That team actually had a lot of talent.

4 guys who were selcted All Pro during their career, Boomer Esiason, DT Tim Krumrie, Safety David Fulcher, and LB Alfred Williams.... 


5 more guys who made Pro Bowl teams, TE Rodney Holman (3 X), RB Harold Green, WR Carl Pickens (2 X), Safety Darryl Williams, and CB Eric Thomas.....

Plus other talented players like WR Tim McGee (1211 yards and 18.6 avg in '89), and LB/DE Danny Stubbs (2 seasons with 9 sacks, 52 for his career).