Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Parallels between Burrow and Andrew Luck in Year 1
#21
(05-06-2020, 06:20 PM)fredtoast Wrote: The entire left side of the colt's 2010 O-line was replaced with rookie starters in 2011.

Plus the 10 win 2010 Colts were not a good team at all.  The were a bad team that was carried by the greatest QB of all time.  They were 29th in rushing and 23rd in defense.

10 win team that was not a good team at all, eh?

All-Pro Future HoF QB
All-Pro Future HoF WR (plus solid Garcon as a #2)
Pro Bowl TE (plus solid Tamme as a #2)
Pro Bowl RB
All-Pro Possible HoF C
All-Pro Future HoF RDE 
All-Pro Future HoF LDE
Pro Bowl FS
All-Pro Possible HoF K
All-Pro P

If only all "not good" teams could be so talented and winning.   Ninja
____________________________________________________________

[Image: 9c9oza.jpg]
Reply/Quote
#22
(05-06-2020, 06:41 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: 10 win team that was not a good team at all, eh?

All-Pro Future HoF QB
All-Pro Future HoF WR (plus solid Garcon as a #2)
Pro Bowl TE (plus solid Tamme as a #2)
Pro Bowl RB
All-Pro Possible HoF C
All-Pro Future HoF RDE 
All-Pro Future HoF LDE
Pro Bowl FS
All-Pro Possible HoF K
All-Pro P

If only all "not good" teams could be so talented and winning.   Ninja

Not that you name dropped him or anything, but I'd forgotten all about Dallas Clarke.
Poo Dey
Reply/Quote
#23
(05-06-2020, 09:12 PM)jason Wrote: Not that you name dropped him or anything, but I'd forgotten all about Dallas Clarke.

Dallas Clarke was a good damn TE alright. That was a very good team the Colts had in 2010, 2011 wasn't near as good tho.
Reply/Quote
#24
(05-06-2020, 09:17 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Dallas Clarke was a good damn TE alright. That was a very good team the Colts had in 2010, 2011 wasn't near as good tho.

I went to the Colts game in 2011... The lil avatar of AJ pointing at his name plate that Luvinit has happened right in front of me in the end zone. We laid a pretty thorough whippin' on them that day. Dunlap returned a fumble for a TD, and looked like a running back doing it.... I was sitting next to some Colts fans. They were some of the most pleasant SOBs you'll ever meet. They were like "Well we've had a lot of good years, we're not gonna let this upset us.".... Must be nice.
Poo Dey
Reply/Quote
#25
(05-06-2020, 09:23 PM)jason Wrote: I went to the Colts game in 2011... The lil avatar of AJ pointing at his name plate that Luvinit has happened right in front of me in the end zone. We laid a pretty thorough whippin' on them that day. Dunlap returned a fumble for a TD, and looked like a running back doing it.... I was sitting next to some Colts fans. They were some of the most pleasant SOBs you'll ever meet. They were like "Well we've had a lot of good years, we're not gonna let this upset us.".... Must be nice.

Awesome. Sure hope we get to feel like that some day after a Superbowl or hopefully many... Joe
Reply/Quote
#26
(05-06-2020, 05:43 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: How?

Colts 2008: 12-4, playoffs
Colts 2009: 14-2, SB Appearance
Colts 2010: 10-6, Division Champion
Colts 2011: 2-14, chose to start Curtis Painter (6th rounder), Dan Orlovsky (5th rounder), and 39-year-old Kerry Collins. Everyone knew they could have easily found better. None of the 3 ever started a game in the NFL again.

Bengals 2016: 6-9-1
Bengals 2017: 7-9
Bengals 2018: 6-10
Bengals 2019: 2-14, starting QB played 13 of the 16 games, only got benched after an 0-8 start

- - - - - - - - - -

One is a good team that had just one bad year to get the 1st overall pick. The other is a bad team that continued to get worse until they got the 1st overall pick in the midst of a 4 game losing streak.

Luck's OL was never as terrible as some made it to be. The guy hung onto the ball for AGES.

https://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/andrew-luck-needs-to-get-rid-of-football-faster-but-is-it-out-of-his-hands-101316
(From 2016, before he missed the entire 2017 season.)
I am aware that is a 2016 article and not a 2011/2012 article, which is the OL we were talking about, but it goes to show a pattern/habit that Luck simply held onto the ball for way too long and paid the price for it. In the process he made his OL look much worse than it was because all the other OLs in the league had to block for much less time.
To give a point of reference, Peyton Manning in 2014 averaged 2.24... meaning his OL had to block for over 20% less time than the Colts OL did for Luck in 2016.
That's actually what made the Bengals OL performance over the last few years so much worse. Andy Dalton has always been known as a QB who could quickly get rid of the ball. I know a couple years here he was in the 3rd quickest in the league range. Can't for the life of me find the article talking about it, though.

The teams:  Simple as this:  Look at the Colts roster in 2011 and 2012 and tell me where there is Pro Bowl talent.  The team Luck inherited was not a perennial playoff team any more.  Similar to the drop off the Bengals experienced after 2005.  

As far as release and holding on to the ball, I know Dalton has a very quick release.  It was one of the fastest, but he also didn't hold the ball very long because of his offensive line.  Luck had the ability to scramble and shake would-be tacklers.  Dalton and Manning, not so much, although Peyton could navigate the pocket pretty well with a slide or step up.  Luck was head and shoulders better at this, though, due to his athleticism and strength.  

The overall point was how Luck elevated the team with a lot of game-ending drives, much like Elway did in his early career.  I have the same hopes for Burrow.  I just don't see the kid being rattled and there are so many stories like the one where Montana pointed out John Candy before that drive in the Super Bowl, and how he was just so confident and relaxed that his team always responded.  This is what I am hoping for from Burrow.  Not that it is fair to heap those kind of expectations on a rookie, but I have never seen a guy play with such demeanor at the top of the college level.  
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
#27
(05-06-2020, 06:41 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: 10 win team that was not a good team at all, eh?

All-Pro Future HoF QB
All-Pro Future HoF WR (plus solid Garcon as a #2)
Pro Bowl TE (plus solid Tamme as a #2)
Pro Bowl RB
All-Pro Possible HoF C
All-Pro Future HoF RDE 
All-Pro Future HoF LDE
Pro Bowl FS
All-Pro Possible HoF K
All-Pro P

If only all "not good" teams could be so talented and winning.   Ninja


Other than the GOAT quarterback they were 23rd in defense and 29th running the ball.  

And you are ignoring the fact that the 2011 team lost both the starting LT and LG to free agency and replaced them with rookies.

So it was not a good team that just played poor QBs.  It was a team with a weak defense and a weak running game and rookies starting on the left side of the O-line.
Reply/Quote





Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)