Tee vs a NEW D - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Tee vs a NEW D (/thread-39746.html) |
RE: Tee vs a NEW D - PCB Bengal Fan - 12-30-2024 (12-29-2024, 11:04 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: And? They whiffed on Ross too and then Boyd stepped up. Simpson was a wiff but then we signed TO. Then Simpson finally broke out, and after he left Marvin Jones stepped up. Etc. We have only been without a legit #2 WR for ~3 years in the last two decades and never two years consecutively. When did Simpson break out? The flip? Come on Man! RE: Tee vs a NEW D - SunsetBengal - 12-30-2024 (12-29-2024, 05:33 PM)bengalfan74 Wrote: Is he saying there's a chance? Man, I really want to believe that there is a financial path that allows for keeping Tee Higgins in the offense and provides for shoring up some of those gaping holes on defense. RE: Tee vs a NEW D - ERIC1 - 12-30-2024 (12-30-2024, 12:00 PM)Bengalbug Wrote: What is downright silly is the bengals lack of restructures. Equally as silly is your opinion on this. do you even understand how restructuring contracts work..it may provide an immediately relief to CAP space but it will come back to bite you in the butt. This team has need s on the interior offensive line..interior defensive line..defensive backfield..linebacker..etc...This team cannot thrive devoting one third of the CAP to three players..And frankly..as much as I like tee..he cant stay healthy..You keep mentioning other teams that do well and then you admit it is because of good drafting..well we have not drafted good..we may not even have a winning record this year and to pretend we are like the chiefs , Eagles etc is a fools paradise. Tee will be tagged and traded, we will get some significant draft picks and will find some receivers that can take the heat off Chase..Bank on it RE: Tee vs a NEW D - ERIC1 - 12-30-2024 (12-30-2024, 12:08 PM)Synric Wrote: Eagles seem to be doing fine paying Jalen Hurts, AJ Brown, and Davonta Smith... not to mention Lane Johnson, Jordan Mailata, Landon Dickerson, and of course Saquan Barkley.[color=var(--m3c11)]the Philadelphia Eagles scouting department typically consists of a relatively large team, including a Director of Player Personnel, multiple area scouts for different regions, assistant directors for college and pro scouting, and other personnel dedicated to player evaluation, with the exact size varying depending on the team's needs, but generally numbering in the double digits across different scouting roles. .....the eagles had a plan in place 3-4 years along with a new coach and its paying benefits...should the Bengals get smart this off-season hire more scouts etc..better evaluate players..have a better team..maybe in 3-4 years they could find a way to keep Higgins...But we are a million miles away from that..we have needs on the offensive and defensive line, defensive backfield, linebackers etc..at this point in time you cant blow one third of your salary cap on 3 players..as far as receivers go to take the heat off Chase..I think Yoshi has good potential..we have gesecki..and again..I bet every contributor on this Bengals jungle noise board can identify 15-20 receivers in the draft that would transition well..If the Bengals powers that be, scouts, coaches cant do this..oh well [/color] RE: Tee vs a NEW D - Bengalbug - 12-30-2024 (12-30-2024, 01:02 PM)ERIC1 Wrote: [color=var(--m3c11)]the Philadelphia Eagles scouting department typically consists of a relatively large team, including a Director of Player Personnel, multiple area scouts for different regions, assistant directors for college and pro scouting, and other personnel dedicated to player evaluation, with the exact size varying depending on the team's needs, but generally numbering in the double digits across different scouting roles. .....the eagles had a plan in place 3-4 years along with a new coach and its paying benefits...should the Bengals get smart this off-season hire more scouts etc..better evaluate players..have a better team..maybe in 3-4 years they could find a way to keep Higgins...But we are a million miles away from that..we have needs on the offensive and defensive line, defensive backfield, linebackers etc..at this point in time you cant blow one third of your salary cap on 3 players..as far as receivers go to take the heat off Chase..I think Yoshi has good potential..we have gesecki..and again..I bet every contributor on this Bengals jungle noise board can identify 15-20 receivers in the draft that would transition well..If the Bengals powers that be, scouts, coaches cant do this..oh well 15-20? So half or more WR drafted will transition “well”? What does that even mean? It’s statistically the lowest hit rate in NFL drafts. 4 rookies have more yards this year, one of which is a Tight end. So 3/35 drafted wide receivers. All have played 3, or more, games than tee Higgins. 1 rookie has as many touchdowns (1/35 drafted). Only 7 out of 35 WR have 500 or more yards. Troy Franklin is the 15th rookie in receiving yards, 251. Not saying that more guys won’t continue to get better, but expecting immediate production out of rookie WRs, especially those drafted later, is fools gold. Obviously exceptions exist (Puka), but more flame out than end up being solid contributors. RE: Tee vs a NEW D - THE PISTONS - 12-30-2024 (12-30-2024, 01:49 PM)Bengalbug Wrote: 15-20? So half or more WR drafted will transition “well”? What does that even mean? It’s statistically the lowest hit rate in NFL drafts. In general, relying on any rookie to be a quality starter Year 1 doesn't work, but WR is tough. Of course, we have Burrow and Chase too. RE: Tee vs a NEW D - THE PISTONS - 12-30-2024 (12-30-2024, 12:16 AM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Oh weird, I didn't know Whitworth, Bates, or Reader played WR which is the only position I was talking about in the posts you replied to. I do agree that they've found good WR's in Scott/Pickens, TJ/Ochocinco, Chase/Higgins. They've had their misses too. And Chase is unsigned because they couldn't agree on the structure of the contract. That seems like a bigger issue than the board in general thinks it is. RE: Tee vs a NEW D - Bengalbug - 12-30-2024 (12-30-2024, 01:55 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: In general, relying on any rookie to be a quality starter Year 1 doesn't work, but WR is tough. If you go back the last 10 years: Mario Alford Tyler Boyd Cody core John Ross Josh Malone Auden Tate Tee Higgins J Chase Charlie jones Andre iosivas Jermaine Burton It’s not great. RE: Tee vs a NEW D - THE PISTONS - 12-30-2024 (12-30-2024, 12:12 AM)J24 Wrote: Can't believe you forgot about Zietler! You are losing your touch Negatron! It's funny...I got called Negatron for complaining about the lack of scouts, Zac Taylor's hire, and the Bengals not having a GM. Seems those things are all fairly accurate issues still... Now, apparently thinking they can keep Tee and fix the defense is controversial. RE: Tee vs a NEW D - THE PISTONS - 12-30-2024 (12-30-2024, 01:58 PM)Bengalbug Wrote: If you go back the last 10 years: Yes. Thanks for looking that up. So while the Bengals generally have a quality #1 and 2 WR, they've had a lot of misses to get to that. RE: Tee vs a NEW D - 3wt - 12-30-2024 (12-30-2024, 12:28 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Man, I really want to believe that there is a financial path that allows for keeping Tee Higgins in the offense and provides for shoring up some of those gaping holes on defense. I think that the moves Tee has made and the priorities he has articulated might make it doable, despite the legitimate barriers of putting so much money on three contracts. Certainly a long shot, but might be doable. One of the keys will be the Bengals matching his concessions with theirs. It's a different team with him on the field. I also think the Bengals need to look at Philadelphia's operating model. They seem to have found a way to transition from one playoff roster to a new one without financially imploding. Requires planning and thinking out of the box, and putting more resources into your scouting team. We have been blessed with a dynamic core. They need to earn their keep by not letting historical failures to repeat themselves. Hope you're listening Elizabeth! The Burrow window is deceptively small RE: Tee vs a NEW D - ERIC1 - 12-30-2024 (12-30-2024, 02:31 PM)3wt Wrote: I think that the moves Tee has made and the priorities he has articulated might make it doable, despite the legitimate barriers of putting so much money on three contracts. RE: Tee vs a NEW D - ERIC1 - 12-30-2024 good post but tee Higgins is not going to accept 5-7 million less for a number2 receiver salary..nor should he..You hit the nail on the head..and whether it be Philadelphia , or Kansas City..they have a plan.. robust scouting departments etc..we are not there..we have to get there..Burrow Higgins Chase is not going to carry this team and when you consider our needs at this time interior offensive line, interior defensive line, defensive backfield,,linebacker etc..its crazy to pay 3 players over 100 million bucks..especially one that gets hurt quite frequently..so we will see..the best off season news for me would have nothing to do with Higgins but I would jump for joy ...and feel confident about the future if they added scouts ..maybe even a real GM..and that deficiency is the root cause for all the teams problems..but we ended the season on a high note, the Bengals are respected,Burrow is having an MVP year and I am ok with that..ELIZABETH ELIZABETH ELIZABETH...time for gramps to retire..hire a GM and enlarge the scouting deartment RE: Tee vs a NEW D - ERIC1 - 12-30-2024 (12-30-2024, 01:59 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: It's funny...I got called Negatron for complaining about the lack of scouts, Zac Taylor's hire, and the Bengals not having a GM. they potentially can keep Tee..do some restructuring now and maybe fix the defense somewhat..But it will come back to bite us in the butt three years from now RE: Tee vs a NEW D - Nicomo Cosca - 12-30-2024 (12-30-2024, 02:42 PM)ERIC1 Wrote: good post but tee Higgins is not going to accept 5-7 million less for a number2 receiver salary..nor should he..You hit the nail on the head..and whether it be Philadelphia , or Kansas City..they have a plan.. robust scouting departments etc..we are not there..we have to get there..Burrow Higgins Chase is not going to carry this team and when you consider our needs at this time interior offensive line, interior defensive line, defensive backfield,,linebacker etc..its crazy to pay 3 players over 100 million bucks..especially one that gets hurt quite frequently..so we will see..the best off season news for me would have nothing to do with Higgins but I would jump for joy ...and feel confident about the future if they added scouts ..maybe even a real GM..and that deficiency is the root cause for all the teams problems..but we ended the season on a high note, the Bengals are respected,Burrow is having an MVP year and I am ok with that..ELIZABETH ELIZABETH ELIZABETH...time for gramps to retire..hire a GM and enlarge the scouting deartment RE: Tee vs a NEW D - ERIC1 - 12-30-2024 (12-30-2024, 02:45 PM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: Thanks nicom.. but I am relatively new here.l enjoythe debates with great fans..but unlike yourself I am not here to compete for relevance.. RE: Tee vs a NEW D - George Cantstandya - 12-30-2024 (12-30-2024, 02:31 PM)3wt Wrote: Hope you're listening Elizabeth! (12-30-2024, 02:42 PM)ERIC1 Wrote: ELIZABETH ELIZABETH ELIZABETH...time for gramps to retire..hire a GM and enlarge the scouting deartment If you all are referring to Elizabeth Blackburn she is the Director of Strategy & Engagement. So I don't think she has a lot of say in such things at this time but I could be wrong. Perhaps you are thinking of Katie Blackburn the Executive Vice President? RE: Tee vs a NEW D - Nicomo Cosca - 12-30-2024 (12-30-2024, 03:14 PM)ERIC1 Wrote: Thanks nicom.. but I am relatively new here.l enjoythe debates with great fans..but unlike yourself I am not here to compete for relevance.. It’s just nice to be able to read a post without straining your eyes. Try some paragraphs. RE: Tee vs a NEW D - TheLeonardLeap - 12-30-2024 (12-30-2024, 11:20 AM)jason Wrote: We've had a lot of good WRs over the decades, but it took them 5 seasons to recover from Marvin Jones walking. I do realize injury played a role in AJ Green and Tyler Boyd not really being ba thing, but still. 5 seasons? Brandon LaFell the very next year had 862 yards as our #2 WR (35th most among WRs) He didn't repeat it in 2017, but in 2018 Tyler Boyd broke out big. Our #1s health just started failing (which is not the same conversation we're having, if Chase goes down for a year and Tee is shoved into the #1 role, we still had a legitimate #1 and #2 on our roster, injuries just happened). (12-30-2024, 12:15 PM)PCB Bengal Fan Wrote: When did Simpson break out? The flip? Come on Man! He had >700 yards for us on a playoff team in 2011, he was 39th among all WRs in receiving yards that year. I consider that a breakout and a quality year for a #2 WR. Even more so considering we weren't throwing the ball nearly 40 times a game like we are now. RE: Tee vs a NEW D - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 12-30-2024 (12-30-2024, 12:28 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Man, I really want to believe that there is a financial path that allows for keeping Tee Higgins in the offense and provides for shoring up some of those gaping holes on defense. Same here Sunset. That would be ideal honestly, as long as we can shore up the gaping holes and keep Tee I am more than happy. I like what I heard there from Tee taking into account his situation. |