(04-14-2020, 06:42 PM)Truck_1_0_1_ Wrote: Mims.

I'm in the super-minority on that one, but I just don't see a Baylor WR being successful, in the modern day (sans Josh Gordon, of course).

I'd go anyone but him, even if he was available.


Lots of hype from the recent guys, but all (aside from Gordon) were nothing better than average #2s or worse.

Just like there has never been a successful Samoan/Tongan/Pacific Islander QB in league history, who's to say Tua wouldn't buck that trend?

I don't think he does and I don't think Mims will be that great.

We will see how things play out :)

(04-15-2020, 02:53 AM)Jpoore Wrote: I don’t get this one at all. Mims screams a lesser aj green. Contorts his body to catch everything, great route runner, great hands, extremely physical, dominated everyone at senior bowl.

(04-14-2020, 06:43 PM)Okeana Wrote: Here we go again.  I spent months arguing with you guys about Mixon and how he was going to be a total pro.  You better know all the facts before you just throw stuff out and judge people.

(04-14-2020, 08:30 PM)Jpoore Wrote: Besides burrow u mean? Grant delpit. Want him nowhere near my team

(04-14-2020, 08:01 PM)Schmitbuck Wrote: I'm with you on Mims. I read he drops a lot of catchable balls.

(04-15-2020, 10:29 PM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: Pretty much every decent LB that could be there at 33 has been mentioned...lol

I guess you guys want to see a lot of Jordan Evans this year? We can’t keep ignoring the position forever.

(04-15-2020, 11:20 PM)Whatever Wrote: To be fair, every LB that could be there at 33 has significant warts.  A lot of those can be deal breakers depending on your criteria.

For example, I like Murray's upside, but I can totally see why someone wouldn't want him at 33.  Many think they will run more big nickel with 3 S's, which also makes LB less of a need.  

(04-16-2020, 01:07 AM)Bengal Dude Wrote: Austin Jackson. His weaknesses and athleticism are similar to Ogbuehi. We saw how that mess went.

(04-16-2020, 12:49 AM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: I get that, but is the LB group so dire that we don’t have the luxury of going BPA at 33? I think at least some would say yes. We haven’t drafted a LB higher than the 3rd since Rey Maualuga over a decade ago. At some point we have to address it. I’d personally rather draft a LB high than be forced to overpay one in FA.

(04-16-2020, 10:52 AM)Whatever Wrote: I wouldn't necessarily call it dire.  You run 2 stack LB's in a 3-4 base, which would be Pratt and Bynes.  You also pull a stack off in nickel.  They can certainly use an upgrade and depth is a need, but I don't feel it's a LB or bust situation at 33, either.  They signed 5 new defensive starters in FA.  At some point you have to do something to help the offense.

I wouldn't say you can just go BPA, but this team has several needs.  They also need WR, T, and G.  It's very likely that the best available T and/or WR at 33 is a better prospect than the best available LB.  

(04-16-2020, 12:49 AM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: I get that, but is the LB group so dire that we don’t have the luxury of going BPA at 33? I think at least some would say yes. We haven’t drafted a LB higher than the 3rd since Rey Maualuga over a decade ago. At some point we have to address it. I’d personally rather draft a LB high than be forced to overpay one in FA.