Volson with 1st team - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Volson with 1st team (/thread-32801.html) |
RE: Volson with 1st team - Frank Booth - 08-17-2022 (08-17-2022, 12:56 AM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: The Nate endorsement of death. Nate is optimistic to a fault RE: Volson with 1st team - Bengal Dude - 08-17-2022 I'm hoping Volson gets some playing time with the starters against the Giants. It'd be nice to know what he can do against better competition. If he plays like he did against Arizona, then it's time to think he'll be the week 1 starter. RE: Volson with 1st team - Synric - 08-17-2022 (08-15-2022, 10:00 AM)ochocincos Wrote: I'd have to go find the post, but his pass rush grade was better than his overall grade indicated. PFF player grades are so random and crap. Look at Trevor Pennings grades for pre-season week 1 he received an 86.2 overall. Ok if you look at their splits he received an 96.4 run blocking grade which I would say is accurate because he looked very good run blocking... but as a pass blocker he gave up 5 pressures including a sack he received a 28.6 pass blocking grade. Now tell me how can a LEFT TACKLE have such a bad pass blocking game average out at an 86.2? I believe player grades depend solely on the grader and each one grades differently. RE: Volson with 1st team - Whatever - 08-17-2022 (08-17-2022, 07:35 AM)Synric Wrote: PFF player grades are so random and crap. Unfortunately, since PFF has been trying to push their draft rankings, there seems to be some flubbing of grades for rookies they had graded high. RE: Volson with 1st team - KillerGoose - 08-17-2022 (08-17-2022, 07:35 AM)Synric Wrote: PFF player grades are so random and crap. They are probably doing some kind of weighting based on snaps played. Not justifying them, I am not a huge fan of their grades, either, but they are just using math to achieve their grades. I would guess he had significantly more run block snaps than PB snaps and they have an equation or method to get there. RE: Volson with 1st team - Synric - 08-17-2022 (08-17-2022, 10:57 AM)KillerGoose Wrote: They are probably doing some kind of weighting based on snaps played. Not justifying them, I am not a huge fan of their grades, either, but they are just using math to achieve their grades. I would guess he had significantly more run block snaps than PB snaps and they have an equation or method to get there. Doesnt matter. Giving a player a near elite level grade of 86 would mean he had an amazing game but Penning allowed 5 pressure including a sack in 14 pass blocking snaps out of 57 total snaps. RE: Volson with 1st team - KillerGoose - 08-17-2022 (08-17-2022, 11:23 AM)Synric Wrote: Doesnt matter. Giving a player a near elite level grade of 86 would mean he had an amazing game but Penning allowed 5 pressure including a sack in 14 pass blocking snaps out of 57 total snaps. I would point you to this part of my post. Quote:Not justifying them, I am not a huge fan of their grades, either, but they are just using math to achieve their grades. I am not a fan of their grades, but you specifically asked "how can a LEFT TACKLE have such a bad pass blocking game average out at an 86.2?" and that is the probable answer. RE: Volson with 1st team - psychdoctor - 08-17-2022 The team needs more depth at OL for me to not be on the edge of my seat for the entire season. I don't think the backup centers are adequate. I hope Caps is healthy. RE: Volson with 1st team - pally - 08-17-2022 In his projected 53, Dehner, in The Athletic, has Volson as the starter RE: Volson with 1st team - Nicomo Cosca - 08-17-2022 (08-17-2022, 01:13 PM)pally Wrote: In his projected 53, Dehner, in The Athletic, has Volson as the starter Safe bet unless they sign someone. Carman just ain’t it. RE: Volson with 1st team - rfaulk34 - 08-17-2022 (08-17-2022, 10:57 AM)KillerGoose Wrote: They are probably doing some kind of weighting based on snaps played. Not justifying them, I am not a huge fan of their grades, either, but they are just using math to achieve their grades. I would guess he had significantly more run block snaps than PB snaps and they have an equation or method to get there. ^ This. It's not an average of the two. PB and RB are different animals and stand on their own merit. The only thing i don't like, if i recall correctly how i read it in the past, is that the overall grade has a bit more "feel" than hard numbers to it. RE: Volson with 1st team - ochocincos - 08-17-2022 (08-17-2022, 01:35 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: ^ This. This has been kinda my problem with the overall grade once I got access to the split grades. There doesn't seem to be a clear-cut formula to calculate the overall grades from the split grades. RE: Volson with 1st team - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 08-17-2022 (08-17-2022, 12:56 AM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: The Nate endorsement of death. I see the ninja TLL but... No, I wasn't high on Ogbuehi at all. He made like one good block as a rookie that kind of gave me a little hope with him but that was it with him. He was just a terrible pick from the beginning. I liked Fisher but he had heart issues which no one could of saw. Carman I liked from the beginning though and before we even drafted him. Still think he can be a great left guard like I said. Just Volson might actually be more pro ready from what I saw in the Friday game. Kind of surprising coming from such a small college and being moved around so much. Carman being moved around clearly has affected his game. He needs to be put at LG and he needs to stay there and we need to quit ***** around moving guys all over the place. Except for Volson though it seems as he can handle it and not miss a beat. RE: Volson with 1st team - Frank Booth - 08-17-2022 (08-17-2022, 02:21 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Carman I liked from the beginning though and before we even drafted him. Still think he can be a great left guard like I said. maybe he can turn out to be decent. But he's obviously never going to end up great. That's just clear to everyone with eyes RE: Volson with 1st team - BFritz21 - 08-17-2022 (08-17-2022, 02:44 PM)Frank Booth Wrote: maybe he can turn out to be decent. But he's obviously never going to end up great. That's just clear to everyone with eyes Decent or even average is completely fine with me because we made the Super Bowl last year with a dog shit line! I'd prefer we give Burrow the best protection possible but that's obviously not possible this year, so I'm just hoping for enough protection so he doesn't get killed and can make some plays. RE: Volson with 1st team - KillerGoose - 08-17-2022 (08-17-2022, 02:21 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: I see the ninja TLL but... Ehhh....no, your recollection is wrong, Nate. You were high on Ogbuehi, I remember this as well. I just went and did a search on the forum for Ogbuehi and there are plenty of posts where you are singing his praise, talking about how good of a pick he was, how talented he is etc. Funny enough, there is a post where you talk about how Ogbuehi was a better prospect than none other than La'el Collins. There is nothing wrong with this, you are just an optimist about the Bengals. However, you don't get to be an optimist AND re-write history RE: Volson with 1st team - SunsetBengal - 08-17-2022 (08-17-2022, 11:23 AM)Synric Wrote: Doesnt matter. Giving a player a near elite level grade of 86 would mean he had an amazing game but Penning allowed 5 pressure including a sack in 14 pass blocking snaps out of 57 total snaps. They are using weighted averages. He graded 28.6 on 25% of his plays (14/57), and graded 96.4 on 75% of his plays (43/57), resulting in an overall score of 86.2. It's not a perfect system, but it's obviously the one that they're using. It's no different that an OL who is a great pass protector 85 grade, and a poor run blocker 42 grade, coming in at a very respectable 76 overall. Why? Likely because the team passes 70+ percent of the time. Give Penning a realistic, complete game where the offense throws 60+ percent of the time, and that 86 grade will quickly fall back to a more realistic number. RE: Volson with 1st team - ochocincos - 08-17-2022 (08-17-2022, 02:21 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: I see the ninja TLL but... The problem with any prospect shifting to a new position is you really don't know if they will succeed at it or not. But we know OT probably isn't in the cards given the incredible lack of length. If Carman can't show he can handle DTs while playing IOL, there's probably not any hope for him. We just wouldn't have known that since we really just saw him at LT at Clemson. The transition sounds easy on paper, but not every OT can shift inside well. RE: Volson with 1st team - Frank Booth - 08-17-2022 (08-17-2022, 03:00 PM)BFritz21 Wrote: I'd prefer we give Burrow the best protection possible but that's obviously not possible this year, But it is. It's just the front office wont make the moves to bring one of 3 free agent linemen in. RE: Volson with 1st team - Frank Booth - 08-17-2022 (08-17-2022, 03:02 PM)KillerGoose Wrote: Ehhh....no, your recollection is wrong, Nate. You were high on Ogbuehi, I remember this as well. I just went and did a search on the forum for Ogbuehi and there are plenty of posts where you are singing his praise, talking about how good of a pick he was, how talented he is etc. Funny enough, there is a post where you talk about how Ogbuehi was a better prospect than none other than La'el Collins. Nate's a lying optimist |