Katie Blackburn - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Katie Blackburn (/thread-19033.html) |
RE: Katie Blackburn - Bengalholic - 01-27-2019 (01-27-2019, 02:21 PM)TheUberHuber Wrote: So let me get this straight, katie learned how to be a gm from one of the worst owners in nfl history and somehow she is supposed to he the savior of the franchise? I think Katie will assume more of a normal 'owner' type role, and she'll let Duke Tobin handle the actual GM related duties. RE: Katie Blackburn - HarleyDog - 01-27-2019 (01-27-2019, 02:38 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: I think Katie will assume more of a normal 'owner' type role, and she'll let Duke Tobin handle the actual GM related duties. If so, do you think that’s something in his wheel house? RE: Katie Blackburn - bengalfan74 - 01-27-2019 (01-27-2019, 02:38 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: I think Katie will assume more of a normal 'owner' type role, and she'll let Duke Tobin handle the actual GM related duties. Yep, and who knows after Mike is totally out of the picture she may name an actual GM in title and authority. Could be Tobin or someone else ? She may totally change it all up. I'd guess she's not going to just totally kick Dad and his ideas/ways to the curb out of respect. RE: Katie Blackburn - Bengalholic - 01-27-2019 (01-27-2019, 02:40 PM)HarleyDog Wrote: If so, do you think that’s something in his wheel house? Well, he's been the quasi-GM for years. With Mike seemingly taking a back seat, and Marvin now gone...I think he finally gets his chance to be the GM for real, even if he may not have the official title. Dehner was talking about this on his podcast the other day, saying that Tobin is basically doing everything a GM would be doing. His father was a very good football man, and I think Duke has many of those same qualities if he's allowed to do the job without interference from Mike and others. RE: Katie Blackburn - HarleyDog - 01-27-2019 (01-27-2019, 02:50 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: Well, he's been the quasi-GM for years. With Mike seemingly taking a back seat, and Marvin now gone...I think he finally gets his chance to be the GM for real, even if he may not have the official title. Dehner was talking about this on his podcast the other day, saying that Tobin is basically doing everything a GM would be doing. His father was a very good football man, and I think Duke has many of those same qualities if he's allowed to do the job without interference from Mike and others. I guess the difference in how effective he can be would be based on how much interference he gets? RE: Katie Blackburn - Bengalholic - 01-27-2019 (01-27-2019, 02:55 PM)HarleyDog Wrote: I guess the difference in how effective he can be would be based on how much interference he gets? That, and if he's allowed full GM type authority in decision making. When Mike and Marvin were in the picture, how often do you suppose that Duke was the winning voice in the room? I doubt it was very often. I honestly think Katie will take more hands off approach as far as normal football related decisions and then we'll see what Duke is capable of. RE: Katie Blackburn - HarleyDog - 01-27-2019 (01-27-2019, 02:59 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: That, and if he's allowed full GM type authority in decision making. When Mike and Marvin were in the picture, how often do you suppose that Duke was the winning voice in the room? I doubt it was very often. I honestly think Katie will take more hands off approach as far as normal football related decisions and then we'll see what Duke is capable of. I'd say your probably right, or at least hope so. RE: Katie Blackburn - I_C_DeadPeople - 01-27-2019 (01-27-2019, 09:33 AM)Sled21 Wrote: Marvin made 6 million a year, and was one of the highest paid coaches in the league, because, you know, Mike Brown is cheap Smallest coaching staff and scouting staff in the league or damn near. And some other coaches made $10M RE: Katie Blackburn - rfaulk34 - 01-27-2019 (01-27-2019, 10:57 AM)Gamma Ray Tan Wrote: Law of diminishing returns That was my exact thought about 30 seconds ago when i read gramps latest post. RE: Katie Blackburn - TheBengalsMind - 01-27-2019 (01-27-2019, 02:21 PM)TheUberHuber Wrote: So let me get this straight, katie learned how to be a gm from one of the worst owners in nfl history and somehow she is supposed to he the savior of the franchise? First what does Jackie Robinson have to do with Marion Motley and Bill Willis being the first African American players signed to a Pro Sports team? Jackie Robinson did what Jackie Robinson did. Which was to be signed in 1947 and become one of the greatest players in baseball history. Marion Motley and Bill Willis did what Marion Motley and Bill Willis did. Which was to be signed in 1946 and become two of the greatest players in NFL history. 1946 came before 1947, so I have no idea what that dig was aimed at. I haven't the slightest idea why you brought up Jackie Robinson. He was the first African American player signed to the MLB. Happy Chandler took a lot of heat for doing it too. Chandler had the power to void Robinson's contract, but he chose to approve it. It cost him his job, but he approved it. Also Marvin Lewis to a point, said going forward everything was on him. He said they got rid of coaches and that next was players. Which if we take him at his words, means players were on the table. Obviously, with his job on the line he didn't feel that bringing in someone and teaching them the playbook was a very viable option, with the people available in free agency. Not signing Whitworth was on both parties. They offered him and the Rams offered him. Whitworth decided to go elsewhere. Whitworth signed a three-year deal which pays him over $11 million annually. The Bengals offered him 10 million, but wouldn't sign him for more then one year with him being 35, with the ability to sign continuous one year deals at that price. He decided on the Rams, he's a grown man and can make his own decisions. In my opinion, they should of offered him more years if that's what he wanted. I hold this amazing ability as a human being to both criticize and praise at the same time. Going to 5 straight playoff appearances deserves praise, whether people like it or not. Cutting ties with a coach after 3 straight none playoff seasons and signing an innovative offensive mind deserves praise, whether people like it or not. Just as not signing Whitworth deserves criticism, whether people like it or not. It doesn't have to be one or the other. RE: Katie Blackburn - t3r3e3 - 01-27-2019 (01-26-2019, 06:59 AM)TheBengalsMind Wrote: I agree, from everything I've read, she took a more prominent role starting after the 2010 season. Not a fan of Jerrah, but his case full of Lombardi trophies wins any argument between his and Mike’s managerial prowess. Even if those Lombardi’s are 20+ years old. RE: Katie Blackburn - michaelsean - 01-28-2019 (01-26-2019, 04:30 AM)Jhowdy54 Wrote: Wonder why Paul Brown jr never got involved with the Bengals. For what it's worth from an anonymous guy on a message board, he's not the sharpest tool in the shed. RE: Katie Blackburn - yellowxdiscipline - 01-28-2019 (01-25-2019, 11:40 PM)TheBengalsMind Wrote: Something has been on my mind here lately. The discussion around here lately has been Katie Blackburn has been running things. I think bringing Marvin back last year was 100% Mike Browns call. All the moves that have happened the last few weeks don't feel like Mike Brown moves, so its possible the he's completely backed off. Who knows, from what we've all gathered Mike is a stubborn, meddlesome man, who feels like because of his father that he's some kind of football prodigy. Running this team is all that he's done, and i could see him trying to hold on as long as he can. RE: Katie Blackburn - Earendil - 01-28-2019 (01-26-2019, 10:03 AM)HarleyDog Wrote: Always thought she was attractive till I saw her at this angle. Now, not at all. What did she look like 28 years ago? I'm sure we all looked better before MB took over. RE: Katie Blackburn - michaelsean - 01-28-2019 (01-28-2019, 11:14 AM)Earendil Wrote: What did she look like 28 years ago? I'm sure we all looked better before MB took over. And when we were 28 years younger. RE: Katie Blackburn - RunKijanaRun - 01-28-2019 Being a great leader/executive has nothing to do with having all the answers. It's knowing where to find them and having the humility to ask. She probably doesn't know (expletive) about football, but if she knows to surround herself with good people who do, she will be successful and so too, in turn, will be the Bengals. RE: Katie Blackburn - Wyche'sWarrior - 01-28-2019 http://thebengalsboard.com/Thread-After-years-of-speculation-seems-us-dumb-message-board-fans-were-on-to-something :andy: RE: Katie Blackburn - I_C_DeadPeople - 01-28-2019 (01-28-2019, 11:14 AM)Earendil Wrote: What did she look like 28 years ago? I'm sure we all looked better before MB took over. Working with her dad has aged her. But Katie was never a looker by any means. RE: Katie Blackburn - Wyche'sWarrior - 01-28-2019 (01-27-2019, 02:21 PM)TheUberHuber Wrote: So let me get this straight, katie learned how to be a gm from one of the worst owners in nfl history and somehow she is supposed to he the savior of the franchise? Think again. :andy: https://www.nytimes.com/1997/09/25/sports/on-pro-football-when-paul-brown-smashed-the-color-barrier.html Quote:Brown was 11 years old in 1946 when his father, Paul Brown, the founder, part owner and coach of the Cleveland Browns, fielded a team with two African-American players. RE: Katie Blackburn - SunsetBengal - 01-28-2019 (01-28-2019, 11:14 AM)Earendil Wrote: What did she look like 28 years ago? I'm sure we all looked better before MB took over. I know that I sure looked a heck of a lot better, 28 years ago.. |