+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html)
+--- Thread: Are Rankins and Stone the worst FA haul of all time seeing the money we gave them? (/thread-39463.html)
RE: Are Rankins and Stone the worst FA haul of all time seeing the money we gave them? - ochocincos - 11-14-2024
(Yesterday, 07:27 PM)Frank Booth Wrote: so this front office signed Rankins and Stone based off their success against cincy...
I suddenly feel void of anything
Folks like James Rapien and Joe Goodberry have been talking about that for quite a few years now.
Bengals have typically gone after dudes they've seen do well against the Bengals.
Making somewhat of a joke, but do they not have any (or look at any) game film of players aside from the Bengals games? lol
RE: Are Rankins and Stone the worst FA haul of all time seeing the money we gave them? - J24 - 11-14-2024
(10 hours ago)ochocincos Wrote: Folks like James Rapien and Joe Goodberry have been talking about that for quite a few years now.
Bengals have typically gone after dudes they've seen do well against the Bengals.
Making somewhat of a joke, but do they not have any (or look at any) game film of players aside from the Bengals games? lol
In fairness alot of teams do do this as well, it's just not a Bengals thing.
RE: Are Rankins and Stone the worst FA haul of all time seeing the money we gave them? - TheLeonardLeap - 11-14-2024
(11 hours ago)WeezyBengal Wrote: Because he doesn't have an all pro like Kyle Hamilton filling in the gaps.
Plus 2023 1st Team All-Pro Roquan Smith and 2023 2nd Team All-Pro Patrick Queen playing LB in front of him.
RE: Are Rankins and Stone the worst FA haul of all time seeing the money we gave them? - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 11-14-2024
(11 hours ago)WeezyBengal Wrote: To be clear, I don't think that's like as far as the evaulations go...but it really does feel like we "make note" or put an "astrisk" next to guys that play well against us that we may want to target and evaluate more in free agency. Like those are the guys that stick out to the front office and then we become bias toward them.
Yeah, not saying the evaluation is purely against us but for it to be a fair evaluation it should be looking at their entire career against all teams.
RE: Are Rankins and Stone the worst FA haul of all time seeing the money we gave them? - PDub80 - 11-14-2024
(Yesterday, 07:27 PM)Frank Booth Wrote: so this front office signed Rankins and Stone based off their success against cincy...
I suddenly feel void of anything
They discussed what drew them to those players and those were the things mentioned consistently. I thought it was weird.
RE: Are Rankins and Stone the worst FA haul of all time seeing the money we gave them? - kalibengal - 11-14-2024
(Yesterday, 10:45 AM)WeezyBengal Wrote: Odom was actually somewhat productive.
The answer to this question is Antonio Bryant. Dude signed a 4 year 27 million dollar deal and practiced like once I believe. Comedy.
people have yet to mention the other Trey,....Waynes that is
RE: Are Rankins and Stone the worst FA haul of all time seeing the money we gave them? - lacesout87 - 11-14-2024
(3 hours ago)kalibengal Wrote: people have yet to mention the other Trey,....Waynes that is
Pretty sure that was the 3rd post in the thread lol