![]() |
P. Alexander Comment - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: P. Alexander Comment (/thread-9130.html) |
RE: P. Alexander Comment - lostpoet2 - 12-09-2016 I think that Alexander needs to go, but I just had this thought: Is it possible that PA was the Bengals' #1 supporter of Jake Fisher during the entire draft scouting process, and that picking Ogbuehi first was a Tobin/Marvin move because of his supposed athleticism and upside? I could see PA then strongly insisting we draft Fisher but being forced to play Ogbuehi in front of him until now because of their draft position. If Fisher was a favorite of PA and possibly Hue, then perhaps that's why he got to play so many different positions last year and has so many special pass plays designed for him. Somehow this makes more sense to me than to believe that Fisher was Marvin's guy all along. To add to that, I can see Alexander liking Fisher because he was acutally good at football in college and had a mean streak (most penalized player in the draft, I believe). RE: P. Alexander Comment - Derrick - 12-09-2016 (12-08-2016, 05:51 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Not saying those are not some good Lineman but what happened to Zeitler this year?Agree with this. WW mentioned the Nate Livings fiasco. I am having a brain freeze and don't recall the details of that fiasco. Can I buy a vowel, please? RE: P. Alexander Comment - bengals67 - 12-09-2016 pass pro not bad against Eagles where was the run blocking? We do not have a top 16 oline. The whole unit needs to be re-evaluated and someone needs to make a hard call on the need for new players whether it is time for a new coach. Mike Brown's loyalty is a strength and also a major weakness. RE: P. Alexander Comment - Shake n Blake - 12-09-2016 Don't have the numbers in front of me, but Dalton was typically closer to a half second faster than the average QB. Not 2/10ths. That's a big difference. Yes 1/2 second on average can reduce sacks by a great deal. A half second is an eternity in the NFL. RE: P. Alexander Comment - BengalsRocker - 12-09-2016 (12-08-2016, 05:28 PM)Hammerstripes Wrote: I'm torn on Alexander. The last few drafts haven't been good, but you can't overlook the following guys that he drafted: Too bad there isn't a decent Center anywhere in that list. :paul: RE: P. Alexander Comment - jason - 12-09-2016 (12-08-2016, 04:33 PM)ochocincos Wrote: Are you talking about Fisher or Ogbuehi?I'm definitely not an expert on this matter. You mention that DEs who line up against the RT generally try to plow through with a bull rush. Is Carlos Dunlap unusual on that side of the line? That dude just uses athleticism, and finesse. I'm sure he's strong as shit too, but you no what I mean. On a side note, Dunlap is on fire disrupting the passing game this year. RE: P. Alexander Comment - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 12-10-2016 (12-09-2016, 11:41 PM)jason Wrote: I'm definitely not an expert on this matter. You mention that DEs who line up against the RT generally try to plow through with a bull rush. Is Carlos Dunlap unusual on that side of the line? That dude just uses athleticism, and finesse. I'm sure he's strong as shit too, but you no what I mean. Yeah, Dunlap be good. RE: P. Alexander Comment - coachmcneil71 - 12-10-2016 (12-07-2016, 10:54 PM)eoxyod Wrote: Ok then so question, shouldn't he receive the same amount of blame for trotting out TJ Clemmings every week, despite him being easily the worst LT in all of football? He's getting his QBs killed but he still starts every week. The answer to this is just that sometimes your hands ARE tied. Ogbeuhi is terrible. That much is true. But Winston is equally terrible. Winston has given up 2 strip sacks. He has caused Andy a ton of pressure too. However having Ced out there gives you much more upside with his athleticism and youth. While it obviously didn't work out, it's hard to say the coaches are left with many other options. If Fisher were showing better signs in practice then he would have been out there often. It sucks, it was a bad pick, but they are working with what they have. Pretty sure that Minnesota's o-line has been decimated by multiple injuries. I haven't fact checked it but thought I had heard or read something like that. I know they lost Smith at RT. RE: P. Alexander Comment - Shake n Blake - 12-11-2016 (12-10-2016, 11:18 PM)coachmcneil71 Wrote: Pretty sure that Minnesota's o-line has been decimated by multiple injuries. I haven't fact checked it but thought I had heard or read something like that. I know they lost Smith at RT. ...and Long at LT. RE: P. Alexander Comment - TKUHL - 12-11-2016 (12-07-2016, 10:33 PM)Burma Wrote: It's impossible to know who to be irritated with, honestly. Is Paul handcuffed, by his bosses, in who he plays? Or is he the one responsible for playing guys that are failing. I don't think I have ever heard who makes the calls on these things. It's not your typical organizational structure. Until I know for certain I will just have to maintain a general testiness and willingness to reassign blame as new facts arise. Having said that, I wholly expect to engage in wanton and random accusations of incompetence, which are wildly satisfying in these times of uncertainty. You make a good point. Would it really be too far fetched to assume Mikey wants his 1st rd pick out there no matter what. Marvin does have the 3 year rookie redshirt policy. But at the end of the day one of these coach's need to grow a pair if thats the case. With the remark PA made about NOT CARING IF CED IS HAVING A BAD DAY leads me to believe that it was PA's decision to start him as long as he has. Marvin obviously doesn't strike fear in any of the asst. coach's like wise with the players to allow PA to continue to start this kid. We can slice and dice this train wreck of a franchise up all we want to figure out who's to blame when everyone knows its Mikey and Marvin period. P. Alexander Comment - wolverine515151 - 12-11-2016 (12-08-2016, 03:09 PM)fredtoast Wrote: People who want to give Andy's quick release for the O-lines protection the last few don't know what they are saying. Even when Andy threw the deep ball that he could not release immediately he was getting good protection. Also he was not getting hit. If his quick release was all that was keeping him from getting sacked then he would still be hit or rushed more than other QBs and that just was not happening. AJ green will travel 40 yards in about 4.5 seconds. So dalton has to throw it after 2.5 seconds because it takes 2 seconds for the ball to travel 40 yards. So even on deep throws the ball still is has to be thrown shortly after the snap. What makes you think that deep throws allow the qb to take longer to throw the ball. Have you ever calculated the math on that. I just did the calculation since your bad at math. Anything less than 2.5 seconds is a quickly thrown ball. You have been schooled toast. RE: P. Alexander Comment - fredtoast - 12-11-2016 (12-11-2016, 05:20 AM)wolverine515151 Wrote: What makes you think that deep throws allow the qb to take longer to throw the ball. Watching a football game. Dalton makes a lot of throws almost as soon as he touches the ball. On the deeper throws it takes longer. If his average is over 2 seconds then that means he has a lot of passes that take a few seconds for him to release. P. Alexander Comment - wolverine515151 - 12-11-2016 (12-11-2016, 11:35 AM)fredtoast Wrote: Dalton makes a lot of throws almost as soon as he touches the ball. That statement is absolutely untrue. The average amount of time he throws the ball is 2.5 seconds. 80% of his throws will be less than 10 yards. So most of those short passes less than 10 yards will be thrown in 2.5 seconds. His long throws will be unleashed in 2.5 seconds The bottom line is whether its a short or long throw the ball is usually out in 2.5 seconds. RE: P. Alexander Comment - wildcats forever - 12-11-2016 (12-08-2016, 05:49 PM)Wyche Wrote: I just think time has passed him by.....I give him a lot of grief, partially because I played on the line, partially because of his ties to the abyss, and partially to watch fred squirm I'm leaning toward stubborn, but since I have zero experience playing on the line, how would you describe the "outdated" aspect? Beyond fundamentals, what are the advancements in OL technique when comparing PA's early days to present day? RE: P. Alexander Comment - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 12-11-2016 (12-09-2016, 07:15 PM)Derrick Wrote: Agree with this. WW mentioned the Nate Livings fiasco. I am having a brain freeze and don't recall the details of that fiasco. Can I buy a vowel, please? PA just kept starting Livings over Evan Mathis for like 2 or 3 years while Livings was clearly worse. Hurt our team big time back then. Then he does it with Og and Bodine. Dude just keeps repeating failures. He is the guy who wanted these guys and he got them. When they suck he is loyal to them to a fault. PA needs to go more than any coach, maybe even more than Marv. RE: P. Alexander Comment - fredtoast - 12-11-2016 (12-11-2016, 02:37 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: PA just kept starting Livings over Evan Mathis for like 2 or 3 years while Livings was clearly worse. No he did not. Mathis started ahead of Livings in games 4-8 in '09 before getting injured. In 2010 he did not deserve to start. RE: P. Alexander Comment - Wyche'sWarrior - 12-12-2016 (12-11-2016, 01:43 PM)wildcats forever Wrote: I'm leaning toward stubborn, but since I have zero experience playing on the line, how would you describe the "outdated" aspect? Beyond fundamentals, what are the advancements in OL technique when comparing PA's early days to present day? You notice how our line never seems to fire off the ball.....instead they allow the defender to come to them? Hue Jackson even mentioned he didn't understand what the hell Piano Man was doing....but it was working so he said nothing. Admittedly....I never really paid a WHOLE lot of attention to his units prior to Marv getting here due to the massive amounts of blackouts throughout the 90s. Personally.....I haven't been impressed with his unit since about 2006. RE: P. Alexander Comment - Wyche'sWarrior - 12-12-2016 (12-11-2016, 06:26 PM)fredtoast Wrote: No he did not. Mathis started ahead of Livings in games 4-8 in '09 before getting injured. In 2010 he did not deserve to start. Pppffffttttt....neither did Livings. In fact...he shouldn't have even been on a roster. RE: P. Alexander Comment - fredtoast - 12-12-2016 (12-11-2016, 01:20 PM)wolverine515151 Wrote: That statement is absolutely untrue. The average amount of time he throws the ball is 2.5 seconds. 80% of his throws will be less than 10 yards. So most of those short passes less than 10 yards will be thrown in 2.5 seconds. His long throws will be unleashed in 2.5 seconds Not sure I understand what you are saying. If 80% of his passes are thrown in less than 2.5 seconds and the other 20% are thrown on 2.5 seconds then wouldn't his "average" be much less than 2.5 seconds? RE: P. Alexander Comment - wolverine515151 - 12-12-2016 (12-12-2016, 09:13 AM)fredtoast Wrote: Not sure I understand what you are saying.Its very clear what I'm saying. I never said 80% of his short passes average less than 2.5 seconds. I said 80% of his passes are less than 10 yards. I also said those short passes less than 10 yards will average 2.5 seconds He averages 2.5 seconds a throw. We know his long passes average 2.5 seconds. Therefor his short passes also average 2.5 seconds. If his short passes average 1.5 seconds like you claim. Then .8 x 1.5 s is 1.2 s and .2 * 2.5 s is .5 s . His average throwing time would be 1.2 s + .5 s which is 1.7 seconds. He averages 2.5 seconds a throw because those short passes take as long to throw on average as his long passes |