If Ragnow was really the target at 21... - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: If Ragnow was really the target at 21... (/thread-15876.html) |
RE: If Ragnow was really the target at 21... - Shake n Blake - 05-07-2018 (05-07-2018, 10:17 AM)Sled21 Wrote: A torn pec will heal.... no doubt about it. As to Glenn, he missed time due to bone spurs in his ankle. He had the surgery to remove the spurs. No spurs=no injury. He didn't tear anything, sprain anything, or break anything. Spurs, which are no longer there. None issue..... Bone spurs is about as minor as surgery gets. You always hear about players getting spurs removed and I don't think they ever miss time from it. Whitworth, Chad and so many Bengals greats have had spurs removed and been fine. (05-07-2018, 01:00 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Who the hell is this Ragnow guy? He must have been the "flavor of the year" over in the draft forum. I'll be honest, I knew way more about Price until all these Ragnow questions started surfacing. You'd think all this talk about Ragnow would die down some when people heard that the Lions drafted him to be a Guard. I guess we got the better true Center prospect. RE: If Ragnow was really the target at 21... - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 05-07-2018 (05-07-2018, 01:16 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: Bone spurs is about as minor as surgery gets. You always hear about players getting spurs removed and I don't think they ever miss time from it. True about the bone spurs Shake. Glenn is ready to go. I doubt the Lions will have Ragnow playing Guard. They have a nobody at Center. Ragnow was a great Center at Arkansas and played Center multiple years in the SEC unlike Price who played Center just last year. One year. We got the more talented, raw Center prospect. RE: If Ragnow was really the target at 21... - Shake n Blake - 05-07-2018 (05-07-2018, 01:21 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: True about the bone spurs Shake. Glenn is ready to go. I don't see Price as raw. He started 55 straight games along the interior. He won the Rimington, so I'd say his transition to Center went over smoothly. Sure, Ragnow started 33 games at Center and Price started 14, but I wouldn't call Price raw. Also, one thing I just noticed is that Ragnow is over 6'5". Almost 1.5 inches taller than Price. Isn't it better for Centers to be on the shorter side? RE: If Ragnow was really the target at 21... - fredtoast - 05-07-2018 Just think of the awful puns Hobson would have came up with using the name "Ragnow". That alone makes me happy we drafted "The Price is Right". RE: If Ragnow was really the target at 21... - ochocincos - 05-07-2018 (05-07-2018, 01:08 PM)Sled21 Wrote: Ragnow was barely mentioned until Lap mocked him to us, now it's like we HAD to have him..... False. There were at least a handful of us in the draft forum for MONTHS clamoring for Ragnow. In fact, I mocked him to the Bengals in my Spooky Mock back in October right after his injury happened. http://thebengalsboard.com/Thread-Spooky-Mock Goalpost commented in that thread saying "Ragnow might be the best center in this draft." A decent number of people here don't start looking into the draft until after the college football season is over, but some of us start looking into next year's class immediately after the previous draft is done and do research throughout the season. What didn't help Ragnow was he injured his ankle and went on IR in late October, so by the time a majority of people started getting into the draft in January, Ragnow's name hardly came up because he had missed his last five regular season games and bowl game. Plus he wasn't able to perform at the Senior Bowl nor Combine due to said injury. Then he performed very well at his Pro Day, as he was fully recovered, and that brought attention to him. Add in that with the fact Price tore his pec doing the bench at the Combine, and it became only natural that Ragnow would start to get more attention. Guys normally rise and fall in draft stock throughout the year. Ragnow's value was low because of his injury and lack of visibility because of it. As he came more into the spotlight, his stock rose. RE: If Ragnow was really the target at 21... - RASCAL - 05-07-2018 (05-07-2018, 02:32 PM)ochocincos Wrote: False. There were at least a handful of us in the draft forum for MONTHS clamoring for Ragnow. In fact, I mocked him to the Bengals in my Spooky Mock back in October right after his injury happened. http://thebengalsboard.com/Thread-Spooky-Mock ragnow is NOT our center. Leave it alone and let this effin thread DIE!!! RE: If Ragnow was really the target at 21... - ochocincos - 05-07-2018 (05-07-2018, 02:43 PM)RASCAL Wrote: ragnow is NOT our center. Leave it alone and let this effin thread DIE!!! You don't have to click the thread. You don't have to comment either. You are doing the exact thing you don't want to have happen...keeping the thread alive. RE: If Ragnow was really the target at 21... - Sled21 - 05-07-2018 (05-07-2018, 02:32 PM)ochocincos Wrote: False. There were at least a handful of us in the draft forum for MONTHS clamoring for Ragnow. In fact, I mocked him to the Bengals in my Spooky Mock back in October right after his injury happened. http://thebengalsboard.com/Thread-Spooky-Mock I said "barely mentioned", not "never mentioned".... RE: If Ragnow was really the target at 21... - ochocincos - 05-07-2018 (05-07-2018, 04:14 PM)Sled21 Wrote: I said "barely mentioned", not "never mentioned".... Fair, you didn't say "never", but "barely" can be subjective because there were at least a few of us who mentioned Ragnow often. So while he may not have been mentioned by a lot of people early on, he was being mentioned by a select few quite a bit. Those who hardly heard anything about Ragnow up until Lap mentioned him either... 1) Didn't really frequent the draft forums until Combine and later 2) Only went off what was (or wasn't) being discussed by NFL Network and ESPN 3) Didn't care to look into Ragnow early on when those few were mentioning him because "most" were not mentioning him. Regardless, at this point, the members have spoken and a majority preferred the "letting the picks come as they may" approach vs trading up to get their guy. And in this case, it may be because Ragnow vs Price were so close in "perceived" value (we'll have to wait and see if it comes true or not) that it was better to keep the extra pick(s). RE: If Ragnow was really the target at 21... - SHRacerX - 05-08-2018 (05-07-2018, 12:00 PM)ochocincos Wrote: Interesting idea. So that would have likely meant no to Jessie Bates III, and it would have likely meant no to either Hubbard or Jefferson because of the lost 3rd round pick. James Daniels, Isiah Wynn, and Will Hernandez (with the thought of moving Westerman to Center) would have all been solid choices, and had the Bengals given up their fourth (a pick we used on a RB?) to get a top tier offensive lineman AND Derwin James in the first round? Yes, please. Derwin James was the highest rated safety on both rush defense and pass defense his sophomore season before his injury his junior year, and again his senior year after his injury. That kid is a standout talent, and an immediate impact player. When he dropped to 17, I would have been looking to strike. You mentioned not needing JBIII in the second with James on board, I would have loved Duke Dawson, an immediate plug and play slot corner with attitude. I had him in many of our mocks. For a player of James ability, I would have easily let go of Hubbard or Jefferson. Just my two cents RE: If Ragnow was really the target at 21... - SHRacerX - 05-08-2018 (05-07-2018, 12:30 PM)yang Wrote: The Bengals are idiots for not trading up two spots. I believe they were caught flat-footed and acted irrationally. Giving up a 4th to get Ragnow over Price was a no-brainer. Did you consider that Price was one of the top rated Guards until moving to center last year? I also love Price's leadership. I think we will be very happy with Price. This offense needed someone with a chip on their shoulder, and I will take a guy that is allergic to losing any day. RE: If Ragnow was really the target at 21... - SHRacerX - 05-08-2018 (05-07-2018, 12:47 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: You just might of caught ole SHRacer there Ocho. Ole? Just because I am staring down the barrel of 50 doesn't make me "ole", but I think you meant "ol" anyways. RE: If Ragnow was really the target at 21... - SHRacerX - 05-08-2018 (05-07-2018, 12:54 PM)Sled21 Wrote: This is just the DeCastro/Zeitler thread all over again. Back then, lot's of people were hand wringing and whining about not getting DeCastro, only to have him get injured while Zeitler started day 1..... Billy Price has proven he is durable with 55 starts at OSU.... True. And had Price put the 225 bar up 40 times as he had been rumored to do in training sessions, we would all be talking about how we just drafted the strongest center in history...instead of a partially torn pec. I wouldn't have been sad by any means with Ragnow, but I am sure happy they got Price. RE: If Ragnow was really the target at 21... - SHRacerX - 05-08-2018 (05-06-2018, 04:35 PM)HarleyDog Wrote: Of course not. For the most part I believe it's MB trying to get talent cheaper. However, The last 2 1st rounds had injuries and even though that kinda blows my theory up, I still think it has merit. However, I do like what Duke said about JR. From the article, in reference to the Bengals: "that typically leans conservative and plays veterans over younger guys." Get em', Fred....tell them how we play the same % of rookies, blah, blah, blah... RE: If Ragnow was really the target at 21... - SHRacerX - 05-08-2018 (05-07-2018, 02:25 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: I don't see Price as raw. He started 55 straight games along the interior. He won the Rimington, so I'd say his transition to Center went over smoothly. Sure, Ragnow started 33 games at Center and Price started 14, but I wouldn't call Price raw. Leverage and also when your QB isn't 6'5"....this is a good point. Ethan Pocic was drafted in the 2nd round last year by Seattle and at 6'6", I wondered about his ability to stay low and drive block and/or Dalton's ability to see over him. He was their backup center and played both guard spots filling in for injured players last year. I don't know how I would rate his performance since he was a center in college, but they didn't seem to have a great offense last year. RE: If Ragnow was really the target at 21... - SHRacerX - 05-08-2018 (05-07-2018, 02:43 PM)RASCAL Wrote: ragnow is NOT our center. Leave it alone and let this effin thread DIE!!! Awww, C'mon. The only thread that will be more fun than this one is after McCarron wins week 1 with a spectacular day and we will have a 15 page thread on why he should have started over Dalton. RE: If Ragnow was really the target at 21... - Shake n Blake - 05-08-2018 (05-08-2018, 06:13 AM)SHRacerX Wrote: Leverage and also when your QB isn't 6'5"....this is a good point. Exactly. Maybe I'm old school, but 6'5" seems like tackle height. You went your center to look (and play) like a bowling ball. RE: If Ragnow was really the target at 21... - Synric - 05-08-2018 (05-08-2018, 09:05 AM)Shake n Blake Wrote: Exactly. Maybe I'm old school, but 6'5" seems like tackle height. You went your center to look (and play) like a bowling ball. Being to tall for a center was Ragnow's biggest knock. All 3 of the top Centers were worth a top 40 pick but they each had an issue. James Daniels is probably going to take a year but he's young and has the highest ceiling. Billy Price can start right away, is technically sound, and mean but he's maxed out and has very short arms. RE: If Ragnow was really the target at 21... - sandwedge - 05-08-2018 (05-08-2018, 06:13 AM)SHRacerX Wrote: Leverage and also when your QB isn't 6'5"....this is a good point. Russell Wilson was running for his life last season, almost as much as Dalton. Only the fact that he has more escapability than Andy, saved Seattle in games. I do think when your QB is only 5'11" and your center is 6'6" has to effect your vision in the pocket. RE: If Ragnow was really the target at 21... - sandwedge - 05-08-2018 (05-08-2018, 05:59 AM)SHRacerX Wrote: Ole? Just because I am staring down the barrel of 50 doesn't make me "ole", but I think you meant "ol" anyways. The 50s are awesome!! EVerything you eat will give you heartburn, more trips to the bathroom and you will still be able to keep up with young'ins!! |