Chase vs. Sewell - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: Draft Central (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-9.html) +--- Thread: Chase vs. Sewell (/thread-26620.html) |
RE: Chase vs. Sewell - Hammerstripes - 02-19-2021 (02-19-2021, 03:14 PM)TJHoushmandzadeh Wrote: I was a slump for Sewell guy but I've changed my mind. I think you could make a stronger case for Kyle Pitts based on what you say here. 1. The safety help will need to be in the middle of the field with a guy like Pitts. He's an instant matchup problem for a safety or a linebacker, let along a corner who can''t match his size/ 2. Sewell would go much farther in fixing the line than you think. IF he's as good as advertised, it significantly limits the extra help needed by a TE or RB on that side. 3. Sewell started for 2 years. Most linemen start for 2 years if they come out as a junior. Experience is non issue for a guy that stepped right into a major program and was immediately the best lineman on his team and possibly the conference. For me - Sewell, Pitts, Chase (and I'm still not sure Chase is the best WR in the draft) RE: Chase vs. Sewell - Socal Bengals fan - 02-20-2021 Sewell all day long , it's shouldn't really a question . Sewell is a big mauler type we have needed for a very long time.. RE: Chase vs. Sewell - Whatever - 02-20-2021 (02-19-2021, 08:10 PM)Essex Johnson Wrote: First you lay out a nice argument , I will take issue though with two things.. Frist Boyd is an established WR and has shown signs of separation and Higgins played well as a rookie and can only improve and the part of separation is can also be attributed to lack of time by line for WRs to separate , I think many times it is hard to evaluate, especially since we don;t know the route called or run... so Burrow with a intense rush gets rid of ball way before the intended route.. Boyd was tied for 94th among qualifying pass catchers for separation per Next Gen Stats. Tee didn't even sniff the Top 100. AJ was tied for dead last. I like Boyd as much as the next guy, but if you objectively look at the rosters of the two SB teams, he's a #3 WR at best for either. As far as the Aggressiveness stat goes, here are the %'s for the qualifying it's from playoff teams. Trubisky 21.2% Tannehill 18.7% Haskins 17.4% Roethlisberger 17.3% Rivers 15.8% Brady 14.8% Jackson 14.4% Mayfield 13.8% Allen 13.1% Goff 12.7% Brees 12.3% Mahomes 11.4% Rodgers 11.2% Wilson 11.1% Burrow 21.5% Only one team with a QB over 20% made the playoffs. The highest % to actually win a playoff game was Brady at 14.8%. Nobody is going to say we should ignore the OL. However, we can't neglect WR, either. If you get an opportunity to draft a star caliber player at either position group, you need to pull the trigger. RE: Chase vs. Sewell - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 02-20-2021 (02-19-2021, 01:32 PM)Whatever Wrote: I'm not against drafting Sewell, but there are two realities people are overlooking. First, no OL can block forever. Second, the defense can always choose to send more guys than you can block. Well, hard to disagree with any of this. Nice post. RE: Chase vs. Sewell - TJHoushmandzadeh's Shiny Shoes - 02-21-2021 (02-19-2021, 08:41 PM)Hammerstripes Wrote: I think you could make a stronger case for Kyle Pitts based on what you say here. Pitts is a match-up challenge and is also likely to attract double coverage but he doesn't help the other WRs in the way Chase does by giving them better individual match-ups. Sewell would be replacing Bobby Hart but the problem last year wasn't actually Bobby Hart. The problem was the interior of the line. Maybe Thuney solves one of those spots but Hart's had a better PFF grade each of the last two seasons than Spain who'd presumably be the other guard. He had a better PFF grade last year than both center candidates Hopkins and Price, as well as the other guard options like XSF and Jordan. It doesn't matter if you have two all pro tackles if your guard and center get blown up down the middle. Sewell won't have played for nearly 2 years. He probably won't get a proper training camp. He's never played in the NFL. Rust is going to be an issue. Experience is going to be an issue. The idea that he isn't going to make rookie mistakes is fanciful. RE: Chase vs. Sewell - Nicomo Cosca - 02-23-2021 Chase is a bad, bad man...
RE: Chase vs. Sewell - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 02-23-2021 (02-23-2021, 12:42 PM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: Chase is a bad, bad man... Yeah, give me the WR on the right... RE: Chase vs. Sewell - Nicomo Cosca - 02-23-2021 (02-23-2021, 06:38 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Yeah, give me the WR on the right... He looks like a mini DK Metcalf. No wonder he does so well against the press. RE: Chase vs. Sewell - yang - 02-24-2021 1.Chase is a generational type WR prospect and given the history with JoeyB this is a no brainer and I pray this happens. 2. Sewell. 3. Trade back and take other WR RE: Chase vs. Sewell - samhain - 02-27-2021 The Chase hype seems to be getting cranked up lately. Hearing national media guys talk about him definitely makes him seem enticing. Not sure if it's real or just due to no more football being played. One thing I def like about him is his build. He looks like a player that can play vs grown men in the NFL, and he's still very young. It reminds me of Tyreek a bit. Tyreek is a speed guy, but he's also pretty jacked for a player with that skill set. Like some have said, he almost has a RB's build at WR (Chase). I'm starting to think he might go before we get a chance to draft him. The hype is only going to grow in the weeks leading up to the draft. RE: Chase vs. Sewell - SunsetBengal - 03-21-2021 Thought that I'd bump this thread, to illustrate a point. Yesterday, someone created an almost identical thread with poll question of Sewell or Chase. As most of you are aware, we staff typically merge these similar threads on the same topic, in an effort to reduce clutter and overall redundancy. However, I decided to allow this one to stand for a while, and see if 3-4 weeks, and a flurry of free agent activity might have changed some people's minds. As it turns out, the overwhelming majority of Bengal fans prefer that the team draft LT Penei Sewel over WR Jamar Chase, and it's not ever close, it's like 85% of fans responding. Can we now take the notion that the Bengals "need" a top rated pass catcher at pick #5, and simply lay it to rest? I'd say that the overwhelming results of not one, but two polls indicate that the vast majority of fans feel that building the OL and protecting Joe Burrow is and should be the team's highest priority in the upcoming draft. RE: Chase vs. Sewell - Essex Johnson - 03-21-2021 (03-21-2021, 06:19 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Thought that I'd bump this thread, to illustrate a point. Yesterday, someone created an almost identical thread with poll question of Sewell or Chase. As most of you are aware, we staff typically merge these similar threads on the same topic, in an effort to reduce clutter and overall redundancy. Well I know we are just fans and not professional coaches, scouts etc but I do hope our gut is the Bengals front office and coaches gut too.. pick Sewell and im think more of those in the poll would say pick Slater if Sewell is gone over Chase also. RE: Chase vs. Sewell - Nicomo Cosca - 03-21-2021 (03-21-2021, 08:43 PM)Essex Johnson Wrote: Well I know we are just fans and not professional coaches, scouts etc but I do hope our gut is the Bengals front office and coaches gut too.. pick Sewell and im think more of those in the poll would say pick Slater if Sewell is gone over Chase also. That would actually be a more interesting pole honestly. RE: Chase vs. Sewell - QueenCity - 03-21-2021 I don't think you can go wrong with either player. You don't need an absolute perfect line for Burrow as he hopefully is still mobile enough to avoid pressure. Gun to head I'd still take Sewell considering we haven't done enough in FA on the line... sign Turner though I think you can punt it 1 more year. RE: Chase vs. Sewell - Gdale_Bengal - 03-21-2021 Well, adding Reiff complicates things doesn’t it. You kinda need to start Sewell if drafted. Funny thing is, he would be a better guard than tackle right now as he needs core strength and feet work and skill refinement. You’re going to prolly start Chase as he’s better than the rest of the receivers outside Boyd and Higgins. You can’t go wrong with either RE: Chase vs. Sewell - IcoHolic - 03-21-2021 My uneducated opinion changes post to post. Chase, Sewell, Pitts.... #5 really is an intriguing place to be this year. RE: Chase vs. Sewell - NATI BENGALS - 03-22-2021 (03-21-2021, 06:19 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Thought that I'd bump this thread, to illustrate a point. Yesterday, someone created an almost identical thread with poll question of Sewell or Chase. As most of you are aware, we staff typically merge these similar threads on the same topic, in an effort to reduce clutter and overall redundancy. Right now I’m convinced it will be one of Chase, Smith, or Pitts. We lost AJ, Erickson, Ross, and Carter in free agency. We draft for need RE: Chase vs. Sewell - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 03-23-2021 (03-21-2021, 09:42 PM)Gdale_Bengal Wrote: Well, adding Reiff complicates things doesn’t it. I think we still take Sewell if he is there and it is the right choice. But if he isn't there the Reiff signing sure makes taking a Receiver much easier at 5. I say Pitts or Chase if Sewell isn't there or trade back and take Darrisaw, Waddle or Slater... RE: Chase vs. Sewell - EatonFan - 03-23-2021 Pitts |