![]() |
Ring of honor - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Ring of honor (/thread-27304.html) |
RE: Ring of honor - Shake n Blake - 04-09-2021 (04-09-2021, 05:00 PM)ochocincos Wrote: Per the Bengals, they are focused on guys who have franchise records and/or been elected to HoF. Dunlap is the Bengals all-time leader in sacks with 82.5 https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/cin/career-defense.htm RE: Ring of honor - jason - 04-09-2021 (04-09-2021, 04:56 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: Between the guys you and ochocincos list, I'd add: I'd want Carlos in myself, but I don't know if that happens now. RE: Ring of honor - Shake n Blake - 04-09-2021 (04-09-2021, 06:28 PM)jason Wrote: I'd want Carlos in myself, but I don't know if that happens now. Time heals all wounds. Except in Cincinnati. Them dudes never forget. ![]() RE: Ring of honor - masterpanthera_t - 04-09-2021 (04-09-2021, 05:29 PM)ochocincos Wrote: Dunno. I knew I missed something. I forgot Holman. That's who I wanted before Ross. Didn't know Trumpy was #1 still. Guess he should be up in the ROH too. On a related note, do the Bengals have great players worthy of the ROH at every position? Not that they need to, just wondering as I was thinking about Takeo Spikes for some reason, and said to myself that he would probably have been the best LB (a true lb non pass rushing type) the Bengals ever had if he finished his while career here. RE: Ring of honor - wanga - 04-09-2021 This is such great news but why it’s taken this long is such a mystery. RE: Ring of honor - Essex Johnson - 04-09-2021 (04-08-2021, 02:18 PM)Roland Wrote: It will be interesting to see how exclusive the Bengals want this club to be. Four inductees makes sense in the first year or two because there's a lot of time to make up for. But unless you want to fill the whole ring pretty quickly it seems like you have to scale back to one or two a year. Not sure what you mean by padded their HOF after Bengals with Dillion.. he actually did the opposite of Johnson.. he went to NE and had a great season.. Chad went to NE and sucked... Dillion is more HOF than Chad.. oh accept for the dumb HOF jacket Chad wore... lol RE: Ring of honor - Essex Johnson - 04-09-2021 (04-08-2021, 08:37 PM)PDub80 Wrote: I am voting for Chad & Ken Riley. but your ok with a wife beater in Chad ?? but pissed at Anderson.. makes little sense RE: Ring of honor - Essex Johnson - 04-09-2021 I put Anderson and Riley in.. My next tier based on performance and time period is: Curtis: dominate in 70s.. no player I know in Bengals history created a new rule because of them W. Anderson- another dominate player during the lost decade for Bengals Parrish: made up a great tandem with Riley and was a great returner Dillion: jerk at times as a player.. but name a player that put up those numbers with one of the worst NFL decade teams in history. RE: Ring of honor - Essex Johnson - 04-09-2021 (04-09-2021, 06:35 PM)wanga Wrote: This is such great news but why it’s taken this long is such a mystery. does it really matter.. the past is not the present RE: Ring of honor - PDub80 - 04-09-2021 (04-09-2021, 09:52 PM)Essex Johnson Wrote: but your ok with a wife beater in Chad ?? but pissed at Anderson.. makes little sense I read somewhere that it doesn't really matter.. the past is not the present. RE: Ring of honor - Truck_1_0_1_ - 04-09-2021 (04-09-2021, 06:28 PM)jason Wrote: I'd want Carlos in myself, but I don't know if that happens now. (04-09-2021, 06:30 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: Time heals all wounds. Except in Cincinnati. Them dudes never forget. He has no ill will towards the organisation; he doesn't like Lou. RE: Ring of honor - rfaulk34 - 04-09-2021 (04-09-2021, 05:29 PM)ochocincos Wrote: Dunno. Trumpy is the only one that's deserving. He was comparable to his peers and he was better than them all with a 15.4 ypc average for his career. RE: Ring of honor - rfaulk34 - 04-09-2021 (04-09-2021, 09:59 PM)Essex Johnson Wrote: does it really matter.. the past is not the present True. But the present is the past. RE: Ring of honor - Bengal Dude - 04-10-2021 (04-09-2021, 11:04 PM)Truck_1_0_1_ Wrote: He has no ill will towards the organisation; he doesn't like Lou. Many of us don't. RE: Ring of honor - fredtoast - 04-10-2021 (04-09-2021, 11:54 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: True. But the present is the past. Correct. Today is tomorrow's yesterday. RE: Ring of honor - fredtoast - 04-10-2021 Sam Wyche is an interesting candidate. Everyone respects him for his innovation of the no-huddle offense, but his record is not really that impressive. He only had 3 winning seasons in 8 years as our head coach and just made the playoffs twice. He only made the playoffs twice and has a losing record overall (61-66) but he did win an AFC Championship. But I think most fans would vote him in mainly because of his big personality. RE: Ring of honor - impactplaya - 04-10-2021 (04-10-2021, 10:29 AM)fredtoast Wrote: Sam Wyche is an interesting candidate. I think he deserves to be in. He accomplished what Marvin Lewis and Paul Brown couldnt do. And thats get the Bengals to The Super Bowl. Regular season wins are certinally accomplishments But getting to the SB is the rarest of team accomplishments In the NFL. To this day the Browns Jags Lions have still not done it. Sam was a darn good coach. Innovative, the players loved To play for him. Went to the playoffs in back to back years I think...I could be wrong. Sam is criminally under rated. RE: Ring of honor - fredtoast - 04-10-2021 (04-10-2021, 11:11 AM)impactplaya Wrote: I think he deserves to be in. He accomplished what Marvin Lewis and Paul Brown couldnt do. And thats get the Bengals to I am pretty sure most fans agree with you. And since this is based on fan voting I think Wyche will get in pretty quickly. I loved Wyche also. I'd vote for him in the Ring of Honor. Just pointing out that his record is not as good as a lot of people think. RE: Ring of honor - Shake n Blake - 04-10-2021 (04-10-2021, 10:29 AM)fredtoast Wrote: Sam Wyche is an interesting candidate. I think most people are aware of his overall mediocre record. Some guys are just icons though. Sam fits that bill with the Super Bowl run, his innovation, and "You don't live in Cleveland". Those things alone make him worthy, IMO. RE: Ring of honor - rfaulk34 - 04-10-2021 (04-10-2021, 10:24 AM)fredtoast Wrote: Correct. Today is tomorrow's yesterday. Exactamundo. |