![]() |
Which one is better? - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Which one is better? (/thread-21509.html) |
Which one is better? - rfaulk34 - 10-06-2019 #buttfumble #daltondump Make your choices here folks and then... Discuss!! ![]() ![]() RE: Which one is better? - Nately120 - 10-06-2019 I was laughing at the playcall, but then when they grabbed Dalton like an annoying drunk the hot barmaid told some drunk guys to "get him outta here" and they mobbed him, lifted him, and tossed him out the door, I was in a full on crazy-laugh. RE: Which one is better? - Fan_in_Kettering - 10-07-2019 (10-06-2019, 11:41 PM)Nately120 Wrote: I was laughing at the playcall, but then when they grabbed Dalton like an annoying drunk the hot barmaid told some drunk guys to "get him outta here" and they mobbed him, lifted him, and tossed him out the door, I was in a full on crazy-laugh. My reaction was the opposite of yours: Seething anger. I understand your laughter but please try to understand my anger. Every play since 2015 where Andy Dalton gets blown up makes me more upset. He’s a sitting duck and he must be the toughest man alive because any other quarterback would have been carried off the field after four years of getting hit. RE: Which one is better? - rfaulk34 - 10-07-2019 (10-07-2019, 12:00 AM)Fan_in_Kettering Wrote: My reaction was the opposite of yours: Seething anger. I understand your laughter but please try to understand my anger. Every play since 2015 where Andy Dalton gets blown up makes me more upset. He’s a sitting duck and he must be the toughest man alive because any other quarterback would have been carried off the field after four years of getting hit. Bullshit. Also, while we're here, you mentioned that Andy was light years ahead of Brissett earlier? Are you watching the game on right now? The Colts wouldn't take Dalton over Brissett if you asked nicely and gave them some money too. RE: Which one is better? - Nately120 - 10-07-2019 (10-07-2019, 12:00 AM)Fan_in_Kettering Wrote: My reaction was the opposite of yours: Seething anger. I understand your laughter but please try to understand my anger. Every play since 2015 where Andy Dalton gets blown up makes me more upset. He’s a sitting duck and he must be the toughest man alive because any other quarterback would have been carried off the field after four years of getting hit. I assure you my laughter was that of a shattered madman, not that of genuine mirth. Any QB who signs an extension for the Mike Brown Bengals is just asking for it. RE: Which one is better? - Nately120 - 10-07-2019 (10-07-2019, 12:07 AM)rfaulk34 Wrote: Bullshit. Also, while we're here, you mentioned that Andy was light years ahead of Brissett earlier? I said years ago that Dalton could demand a trade and end up playing for the Texans who were making the playoffs regularly with bum QBs. But he took a team-friendly deal to stay here and Mike Brown rewarded his loyalty by letting him get ground into the turf. So it goes. RE: Which one is better? - Nately120 - 10-07-2019 Side note, my cousin and I were talking about the Bengals/Steelers game and he said he saw Dalton get sacked like the 100th time and it looked like the linemen were just standing around doing nothing and Dalton screamed something and they went and helped him up. That sort of reminds me of like, some sort of cartoon villain failing and screaming for his bumbling henchmen to pick him up. HELP ME UP, YOU CRETINS! Duhhhh sorry bosss! RE: Which one is better? - rfaulk34 - 10-07-2019 (10-07-2019, 12:09 AM)Nately120 Wrote: I said years ago that Dalton could demand a trade and end up playing for the Texans who were making the playoffs regularly with bum QBs. But he took a team-friendly deal to stay here and Mike Brown rewarded his loyalty by letting him get ground into the turf. So it goes. Since 2015 the most sacked QBs are, in order: Sacks GS Spg Rating TDs Ints 1. Russell Wilson 193 69 2.8 103.2 137 37 2. Matthew Stafford 175 68 2.6 95.4 115 46 3. Aaron Rodgers 160 59 2.7 98.0 118 24 4. Marcus Mariota 147 59 2.5 90.5 76 42 5. Matt Ryan 143 68 2.1 100.6 122 48 6. Andy Dalton 140 60 2.3 92.1 94 42 7. Blake Bortles 140 60 2.3 83.1 92 58 8. Cam Newton 139 62 2.2 86.7 100 54 9. Kirk Cousins 138 68 2.0 97.7 114 48 10. Philip Rivers 137 68 2.0 96.0 129 58 Russell Wilson laughs at Dalton's sack numbers. Stafford, Rodgers and Mariota too. All of them but Mariota laugh at his output as well. RE: Which one is better? - Nicomo Cosca - 10-07-2019 (10-07-2019, 12:58 AM)rfaulk34 Wrote: Since 2015 the most sacked QBs are, in order: Don’t worry if the OL plays even halfway decent the homers will just shift the blame onto Taylor. It’s NEVER Andy Dalton’s fault! RE: Which one is better? - Nicomo Cosca - 10-07-2019 I even heard that one of the Bengals OL farted on the missed throw to Eifert in the EZ. Startled Dalton otherwise he would have threaded it in there! RE: Which one is better? - rfaulk34 - 10-07-2019 (10-07-2019, 01:32 AM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: Don’t worry if the OL plays even halfway decent the homers will just shift the blame onto Taylor. Never!! Not poor, innocent Andy! RE: Which one is better? - rfaulk34 - 10-07-2019 (10-07-2019, 01:34 AM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: I even heard that one of the Bengals OL farted on the missed throw to Eifert in the EZ. Startled Dalton otherwise he would have threaded it in there! Probably Hopkins. How can you throw a TD pass with fart all over your hands?! |