Did The FO “luck” into Zac?

[Soonerpeace]

(10-30-2024, 10:07 PM)jj22 Wrote: I don’t remember Zac being on anyone’s radar.

And I don’t think we could get into a bidding war with a team who would want a top candidate like BJ.Especially if they want any sort of power. I’d be all for him tho. 

Zac worked out great for the gamble. But how much was that luck, Burrow, or was it FO savvy to recognize a coach that could lead them to a SB that no one else saw and hired them?

I just don’t know.

Zac was a serious Cardinals candidate and Denver. He interviewed both places. Denver had a lot of guard rails. He liked the ownership in place at Cincy as did his agent. 

[Nicomo Cosca]

(Yesterday, 02:43 PM)Soonerpeace Wrote: Zac was a serious Cardinals candidate and Denver. He interviewed both places. Denver had a lot of guard rails. He liked the ownership in place at Cincy as did his agent. 

What’s not to like?

[THE PISTONS]

I wanted to sign Henry or Barkley. They aren't that expensive in the grand scheme of things.

[Destro]

(Yesterday, 02:43 PM)Soonerpeace Wrote: He liked the ownership in place at Cincy…

Then his judgement is definitely questionable!

[Nicomo Cosca]

(7 hours ago)THE PISTONS Wrote: I wanted to sign Henry or Barkley. They aren't that expensive in the grand scheme of things.

Sam Hubbard makes more than Henry.